Suppr超能文献

“他们只是在开玩笑”:减少西雅图公立学校 LGBTQ 欺凌和骚扰的努力。

"They were only joking": efforts to decrease LGBTQ bullying and harassment in seattle public schools.

机构信息

Supervisor, Health Education, (

出版信息

J Sch Health. 2014 Jan;84(1):1-9. doi: 10.1111/josh.12120.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Seattle Public Schools has implemented policies and programs to increase safety, family involvement, and student achievement for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and questioning (LGBTQ) youth. This case study examines students' perceptions of bullying and harassment in the school environment, and teacher intervention when these problems arise in the presence of strong district policies and programs aimed at reducing LGBTQ bullying and harassment in schools.

METHODS

We surveyed students in Gay-Straight Alliance (GSA) groups at 13 secondary schools (N = 107). We also conducted focus groups with GSA students and students not involved in the GSAs in 7 of 13 schools (N = 16 groups, including 154 students).

RESULTS

GSA students who were lesbian, gay, bisexual, or questioning (LGBQ) were significantly more likely than straight students to experience several types of harassment. On the basis of student report, the 2 most common intervention strategies by teachers for verbal harassment included stopping the harassment and explaining why it is wrong; teachers intervened in physical harassment by trying to stop the harassment. Students provided input on how to strengthen teacher interventions, including the need for more consistency in responding and following up. Students also noted a need for more focus on educating those who harass, rather than just asking them to stop.

CONCLUSIONS

Seattle Public Schools has made great strides in creating safe and welcoming schools for LGBTQ students, but still have to work further toward reaching this goal. Data from students on how they experience their school environment can help identify areas for improvement.

摘要

背景

西雅图公立学校实施了一系列政策和项目,以提高同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和质疑者(LGBTQ)青年的安全性、家庭参与度和学生成绩。本案例研究考察了学生在学校环境中对欺凌和骚扰的看法,以及在存在旨在减少学校 LGBTQ 欺凌和骚扰的强大地区政策和项目的情况下,教师干预这些问题时的情况。

方法

我们在 13 所中学的同性恋异性恋联盟(GSA)小组中对学生进行了调查(N=107)。我们还在 13 所学校中的 7 所学校中对 GSA 学生和未参加 GSA 的学生进行了焦点小组讨论(N=16 组,包括 154 名学生)。

结果

与异性恋学生相比,同性恋、双性恋或质疑(LGBQ)的 GSA 学生更有可能经历几种类型的骚扰。根据学生报告,教师对言语骚扰最常见的两种干预策略包括制止骚扰并解释其错误;教师通过试图停止骚扰来干预身体骚扰。学生们提供了加强教师干预的意见,包括需要更一致地回应和跟进。学生们还指出,需要更加关注教育骚扰者,而不仅仅是要求他们停止。

结论

西雅图公立学校在为 LGBTQ 学生创造安全和受欢迎的学校方面取得了长足的进步,但仍需进一步努力实现这一目标。学生提供的有关他们如何体验学校环境的数据可以帮助确定需要改进的领域。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验