Makino Hiroshi, Kato Hiroki, Furui Tatsuro, Morishige Ken-ichirou, Kanematsu Masayuki
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014 Apr;40(4):1098-104. doi: 10.1111/jog.12276. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to predict the tumor response to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) of uterine cervical cancer.
Twenty-five consecutive patients with pathologically confirmed uterine cervical cancer underwent 1.5-T MR imaging including DW imaging before and during CRT. MR images were reviewed for the size and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Pathological evaluation of the therapeutic effect was performed 3 months after finishing CRT, and we divided the subjects into two groups: complete remission (CR) (n=16) and residual tumor (n=9).
ADC was lower before CRT than during CRT (0.89 ± 0.12 and 1.25 ± 0.22 × 10⁻³ mm²/s, respectively) (P<0.01). ADC change between before and during CRT (ΔADC) showed a moderate positive correlation (r=0.435, P<0.05) with the tumor regression rates. ΔADC was higher in the CR group than in the residual tumor group (0.43 ± 0.23 and 0.25 ± 0.15 × 10⁻³ mm²/s, respectively) (P<0.05). The CR rates were higher in the high ΔADC group (ΔADC ≥ 0.50) than in the low ΔADC group (ΔADC <0.49) (100% and 53%, respectively) but marginally significant (P=0.057). The local control rates were not statistically different between high and low ΔADC groups (83.3% and 73.7%, respectively) (P=0.602).
DW imaging including ADC measurement may be useful for prediction and early assessment of pathological response to CRT for uterine cervical cancer, but its impact on local disease-free survival was limited.
本研究旨在评估扩散加权磁共振成像预测子宫颈癌放化疗疗效的效能。
25例经病理证实的子宫颈癌患者在放化疗前及放化疗期间接受了1.5-T磁共振成像检查,包括扩散加权成像。对磁共振图像进行大小及表观扩散系数(ADC)评估。在完成放化疗3个月后进行治疗效果的病理评估,并将受试者分为两组:完全缓解(CR)组(n = 16)和残留肿瘤组(n = 9)。
放化疗前的ADC低于放化疗期间(分别为0.89±0.12和1.25±0.22×10⁻³mm²/s)(P<0.01)。放化疗前后ADC的变化(ΔADC)与肿瘤退缩率呈中度正相关(r = 0.435,P<0.05)。CR组的ΔADC高于残留肿瘤组(分别为0.43±0.23和0.25±0.15×10⁻³mm²/s)(P<0.05)。高ΔADC组(ΔADC≥0.50)的CR率高于低ΔADC组(ΔADC<0.49)(分别为100%和53%),但差异接近显著(P = 0.057)。高、低ΔADC组的局部控制率无统计学差异(分别为83.3%和73.7%)(P = 0.602)。
包括ADC测量的扩散加权成像可能有助于预测和早期评估子宫颈癌放化疗的病理反应,但其对局部无病生存的影响有限。