Thielen Lee, Leff Marilyn, Corso Liza, Monteiro Erinn, Fisher Jessica Solomon, Pearsol Jim
Thielen Consulting, Fort Collins, Colorado (Ms Thielen and Dr Leff); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office for State, Tribal, Local and Territorial Support, Division of Public Health Performance Improvement, Atlanta, Georgia (Ms Corso); National Association of County & City Health Officials, Washington, District of Columbia (Mss Monteiro and Fisher); and Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, Arlington, Virginia (Mr Pearsol).
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2014 Jan-Feb;20(1):98-103. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e31829ed746.
Accreditation of public health agencies through the Public Health Accreditation Board is voluntary. Incentives that encourage agencies to apply for accreditation have been suggested as important factors in facilitating participation by state and local agencies.
The project describes both current and potential incentives that are available at the federal, state, and local levels.
Thirty-nine key informants from local, state, tribal, federal, and academic settings were interviewed from March through May 2012. Through open-ended interviews, respondents were asked about incentives that were currently in use in their settings and incentives they thought would help encourage participation in Public Health Accreditation Board accreditation.
Incentives currently in use by public health agencies based on interviews include (1) financial support, (2) legal mandates, (3) technical assistance, (4) peer support workgroups, and (5) state agencies serving as role models by seeking accreditation themselves. Key informants noted that state agencies are playing valuable and diverse roles in providing incentives for accreditation within their own states. Key informants also identified the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and other players, such as private foundations, public health institutes, national and state associations, and academia as providing both technical and financial assistance to support accreditation efforts.
State, tribal, local, and federal agencies, as well as related organizations can play an important role by providing incentives to move agencies toward accreditation.
通过公共卫生认证委员会对公共卫生机构进行认证是自愿的。鼓励机构申请认证的激励措施已被视为促进州和地方机构参与的重要因素。
该项目描述了联邦、州和地方各级现有的以及潜在的激励措施。
2012年3月至5月,对来自地方、州、部落、联邦和学术机构的39名关键信息提供者进行了访谈。通过开放式访谈,询问受访者其所在机构目前使用的激励措施以及他们认为有助于鼓励参与公共卫生认证委员会认证的激励措施。
根据访谈,公共卫生机构目前使用的激励措施包括:(1)财政支持;(2)法律规定;(3)技术援助;(4)同行支持工作组;(5)州机构自身寻求认证以树立榜样。关键信息提供者指出,州机构在为本州内的认证提供激励措施方面发挥着宝贵且多样的作用。关键信息提供者还指出,疾病控制与预防中心以及其他参与者,如私人基金会、公共卫生机构、国家和州协会以及学术界,为支持认证工作提供技术和财政援助。
州、部落、地方和联邦机构以及相关组织可以通过提供激励措施促使机构走向认证,从而发挥重要作用。