Thielen Lee, Dauer Edward, Burkhardt Diane, Lampe Sarah, VanRaemdonck Lisa
Thielen Consulting, Fort Collins, Colorado (Ms Thielen); University of Denver Sturm College of Law, Denver, Colorado (Mr Dauer and Dr Burkhardt); and Colorado Association of Local Public Health Officials, Denver (Mss Lampe and VanRaemdonck).
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2014 Jan-Feb;20(1):111-8. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182a505c9.
The Public Health Accreditation Board (PHAB) began accepting applications for national voluntary accreditation in the fall of 2011. There are 3 prerequisites for accreditation: health assessments; health improvement plans; and strategic plans. These prerequisites must be in place for a state or local public health agency to apply for PHAB accreditation. Completion of the prerequisites can become a barrier for agencies that are considering applying for accreditation.
This project looked at all 50 states through a legal lens to identify legal tools in the form of laws, rules, executive orders, contracts, legislative resolutions, and other tools that are used to authorize or require that a state or local health agency complete 1 or more of the prerequisites.
Using legal research platforms and a Boolean search stream, an inquiry of legal tools in all 50 states was completed to determine where legal tools are used to authorize or require the 3 PHAB prerequisites. Once legal tools were found, interviews were conducted with key informants from each state to understand the implementation and use of the legal tools found and collect any additional legal tools that were not found from the legal search.
The results include key findings and, importantly, an inventory of laws and legal tools that are being used around the country to require and support completion of the prerequisites. Within all 50 states, 26 states have some type of a mandate regarding 1 or more of the PHAB prerequisites. This includes 1 state that includes a mandate for PHAB accreditation.
States use a wide variety of legal tools to implement the prerequisites for voluntary accreditation. It is important to understand the interpretation, enforcement, and support of the laws and legal tools to determine whether the tools have impact in individual states.
公共卫生认证委员会(PHAB)于2011年秋季开始接受全国自愿认证申请。认证有3个先决条件:健康评估;健康改善计划;以及战略计划。一个州或地方公共卫生机构要申请PHAB认证,必须具备这些先决条件。对于考虑申请认证的机构来说,完成这些先决条件可能成为一个障碍。
本项目从法律角度审视了所有50个州,以确定法律、规则、行政命令、合同、立法决议及其他工具形式的法律手段,这些手段用于授权或要求州或地方卫生机构完成1项或多项先决条件。
利用法律研究平台和布尔搜索流,对所有50个州的法律手段进行了调查,以确定哪些法律手段用于授权或要求满足PHAB的3个先决条件。一旦找到法律手段,就与每个州的关键信息提供者进行访谈,以了解所发现法律手段的实施和使用情况,并收集法律搜索中未找到的任何其他法律手段。
结果包括主要发现,重要的是,还有一份全国各地用于要求和支持完成先决条件的法律和法律手段清单。在所有50个州中,有26个州对PHAB的1项或多项先决条件有某种类型的授权。这包括1个对PHAB认证有授权的州。
各州使用各种各样的法律手段来实施自愿认证的先决条件。了解法律和法律手段的解释、执行和支持情况,对于确定这些手段在各个州是否有影响很重要。