Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Children's Hospital and Medical Center, University of Nebraska College of Medicine, 8200 Dodge St, Omaha, NE, 68114, USA,
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Feb;30(2):305-12. doi: 10.1007/s10554-013-0348-x. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
Precise quantification of left ventricular (LV) cavity dimensions assumes great importance in clinical cardiology. Pediatric guidelines recommend the left parasternal short axis (PSA) imaging plane for measuring LV cavity dimensions, while measuring from the long axis (PLA) plane is the convention in adult echocardiography. We sought to compare measurements obtained by two-dimensional (2D) and M-mode (MM) techniques in the two imaging planes. Healthy subjects were prospectively recruited for research echocardiography. Complete 2D, spectral and color flow Doppler examinations were performed in a non-sedated state. All subjects had structurally and functionally normal hearts. LV cavity dimensions were obtained in PLA and PSA views using 2D and MM yielding four measurement sets for each subject: PLA direct 2D; PLA 2D-guided MM, PSA direct 2D, PSA 2D-guided MM. A commercially available ultrasound system (Vivid E9, GE) was used and data stored digitally for subsequent analysis (EchoPAC BT11, GE). Acquisition and measurements were made by a single observer from at least three consecutive cardiac cycles, and averaged for each of the four categories. The study cohort consisted of 114 subjects (mean age 9 years, range 1-18; mean BSA 1.1 m(2), range 0.42-2.6). The smallest estimate of LV end-diastolic dimension (LVED) was obtained by PLA 2D, with larger estimates by PLA MM, PSA 2D, and PSA MM. Largest estimates of LV end-systolic dimension (LVES) are by 2D methods, with smaller estimates by both MM techniques. The smallest shortening fraction (SF) was by PLA 2D; other methods yielded larger SF. Temporal resolution is limited in 2D methodology and may account for the smaller LVED, larger LVES and smaller SF observed. Long axis methodology may predispose to off-center or non-perpendicular data acquisition and the potential for dimensional underestimation, particularly in diastole. Consistency in method for assessment of LV dimensions in children is an important factor for serial comparisons.
左心室(LV)腔尺寸的精确量化在临床心脏病学中具有重要意义。儿科指南建议使用左胸骨旁短轴(PSA)成像平面来测量 LV 腔尺寸,而在成人超声心动图中,传统上是从长轴(PLA)平面进行测量。我们旨在比较二维(2D)和 M 模式(MM)技术在两个成像平面上的测量结果。健康受试者前瞻性招募进行研究超声心动图检查。在非镇静状态下进行完整的 2D、频谱和彩色血流多普勒检查。所有受试者均具有结构和功能正常的心脏。使用 2D 和 MM 在 PLA 和 PSA 视图中获取 LV 腔尺寸,为每个受试者生成四个测量集:PLA 直接 2D;PLA 2D 引导 MM、PSA 直接 2D、PSA 2D 引导 MM。使用商业上可用的超声系统(GE Vivid E9)进行数据采集和存储,并进行数字存储,以备后续分析(GE EchoPAC BT11)。由一名观察者从至少三个连续的心动周期中进行采集和测量,并对四个类别中的每一个进行平均值计算。研究队列包括 114 名受试者(平均年龄 9 岁,范围 1-18;平均 BSA 1.1 m2,范围 0.42-2.6)。LV 舒张末期直径(LVED)的最小估计值是通过 PLA 2D 获得的,而通过 PLA MM、PSA 2D 和 PSA MM 获得的估计值较大。LV 收缩末期直径(LVES)的最大估计值是通过 2D 方法获得的,而通过两种 MM 技术获得的估计值较小。最小的缩短分数(SF)是通过 PLA 2D 获得的;其他方法产生较大的 SF。2D 方法的时间分辨率有限,这可能是导致观察到的 LVED 较小、LVES 较大和 SF 较小的原因。长轴方法可能倾向于非中心或非垂直的数据采集,并且存在尺寸低估的可能性,尤其是在舒张期。儿童 LV 尺寸评估方法的一致性是进行连续比较的一个重要因素。