Festini Sara B, Reuter-Lorenz Patricia A
Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, 530 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-1043, USA,
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014 Mar;14(1):78-89. doi: 10.3758/s13415-013-0231-1.
Proactive interference (PI) occurs when previously learned information interferes with new learning. In a working memory task, PI induces longer response times and more errors to recent negative probes than to new probes, presumably because the recent probe's familiarity invites a "yes" response. Warnings, longer intertrial intervals, and the increased contextual salience of the probes can reduce but not eliminate PI, suggesting that cognitive control over PI is limited. Here we tested whether control exerted in the form of intentional forgetting performed during working memory can reduce the magnitude of PI. In two experiments, participants performed a working memory task with directed-forgetting instructions and the occasional presentation of recent probes. Surprise long-term memory testing indicated better memory for to-be-remembered than for to-be-forgotten items, documenting the classic directed-forgetting effect. Critically, in working memory, PI was virtually eliminated for recent probes from prior to-be-forgotten lists, as compared to recent probes from prior to-be-remembered lists. Thus cognitive control, when executed via directed forgetting, can reduce the adverse and otherwise persistent interference from familiarity, an effect that we attribute to attenuated memory representations of the to-be-forgotten items.
当先前学习的信息干扰新的学习时,就会发生前摄干扰(PI)。在工作记忆任务中,与新探测相比,PI会导致对近期负性探测的反应时间更长且错误更多,这可能是因为近期探测的熟悉度会引发“是”的反应。警告、更长的试次间隔以及探测的情境显著性增加可以减少但不能消除PI,这表明对PI的认知控制是有限的。在这里,我们测试了在工作记忆过程中以有意遗忘形式施加的控制是否能降低PI的程度。在两个实验中,参与者执行了一项带有定向遗忘指令且偶尔呈现近期探测的工作记忆任务。意外的长期记忆测试表明,对要记住的项目的记忆比对要遗忘的项目的记忆更好,证明了经典的定向遗忘效应。至关重要的是,在工作记忆中,与来自先前要记住列表的近期探测相比,来自先前要遗忘列表的近期探测的PI几乎被消除了。因此,当通过定向遗忘执行时,认知控制可以减少来自熟悉度的不利且持续的干扰,我们将这种效应归因于要遗忘项目的记忆表征减弱。