Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1043, USA.
Neuroimage. 2011 Jun 1;56(3):1726-34. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.048. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
Decades of research using the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm have demonstrated that episodic memory is vulnerable to semantic distortion, and neuroimaging investigations of this phenomenon have shown dissociations between the neural mechanisms subserving true and false retrieval from long-term memory. Recently, false short-term memories have also been demonstrated, with false recognition of items related in meaning to memoranda encoded less than 5s earlier. Semantic interference is also evident in short-term memory, such that correct rejection of related lures is slowed relative to correct rejection of unrelated lures. The present research constitutes the first fMRI investigation of false recognition and semantic interference in short-term memory using a short-term DRM paradigm in which participants retained 4 semantic associates over a short 4-s filled retention interval. Results showed increased activation in the left mid-ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (BA45) associated with semantic interference, and significant correlations between these increases and behavioral measures of interference across subjects. Furthermore, increases in dorsolateral PFC occurred when related lures were correctly rejected versus falsely remembered. Compared with false recognition, true recognition was associated with increases in left fusiform gyrus, a finding consistent with the notion that increased perceptual processing may distinguish true from false recognition over both short and long retention intervals. Findings are discussed in relation to current models of interference resolution in short-term memory, and suggest that false short-term recognition occurs as a consequence of the failure of frontally mediated cognitive control processes which adjudicate semantic familiarity in support of accurate mnemonic retrieval.
几十年来,使用 Deese-Roediger-McDermott(DRM)范式的研究表明,情节记忆容易受到语义扭曲的影响,对这种现象的神经影像学研究表明,长期记忆中真实和虚假检索的神经机制之间存在分离。最近,也已经证明了虚假的短期记忆,即对与记忆编码不到 5 秒前的项目相关的项目的错误识别。语义干扰在短期记忆中也很明显,例如,与相关诱饵的正确拒绝相对于与不相关诱饵的正确拒绝速度较慢。本研究首次使用 fMRI 研究了使用短期 DRM 范式的短期记忆中的虚假识别和语义干扰,在该范式中,参与者在短暂的 4 秒填充保留间隔内保留了 4 个语义联想。结果显示,左中额下回(BA45)的激活增加与语义干扰有关,并且这些增加与受试者之间干扰的行为测量之间存在显著相关性。此外,当相关诱饵被正确拒绝而不是错误记忆时,背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)会增加。与虚假识别相比,真实识别与左侧梭状回的增加有关,这一发现与增加的感知处理可能区分短期和长期保留间隔内的真实和虚假识别的观点一致。研究结果与短期记忆中干扰解决的当前模型有关,并表明虚假的短期识别是由于额叶介导的认知控制过程失败导致的,这些过程在支持准确记忆检索的情况下对语义熟悉度进行裁决。