• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

致癌作用的体细胞突变和组织组织场理论相互矛盾吗?

Are the somatic mutation and tissue organization field theories of carcinogenesis incompatible?

作者信息

Rosenfeld Simon

机构信息

National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention, Rockville, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Inform. 2013 Dec 1;12:221-9. doi: 10.4137/CIN.S13013. eCollection 2013.

DOI:10.4137/CIN.S13013
PMID:24324325
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3855256/
Abstract

Two drastically different approaches to understanding the forces driving carcinogenesis have crystallized through years of research. These are the somatic mutation theory (SMT) and the tissue organization field theory (TOFT). The essence of SMT is that cancer is derived from a single somatic cell that has successively accumulated multiple DNA mutations, and that those mutations occur on genes which control cell proliferation and cell cycle. Thus, according to SMT, neoplastic lesions are the results of DNA-level events. Conversely, according to TOFT, carcinogenesis is primarily a problem of tissue organization: carcinogenic agents destroy the normal tissue architecture thus disrupting cell-to-cell signaling and compromising genomic integrity. Hence, in TOFT the DNA mutations are the effect, and not the cause, of the tissue-level events. Cardinal importance of successful resolution of the TOFT versus SMT controversy dwells in the fact that, according to SMT, cancer is a unidirectional and mostly irreversible disease; whereas, according to TOFT, it is curable and reversible. In this paper, our goal is to outline a plausible scenario in which TOFT and SMT can be reconciled using the framework and concepts of the self-organized criticality (SOC), the principle proven to be extremely fruitful in a wide range of disciplines pertaining to natural phenomena, to biological communities, to large-scale social developments, to technological networks, and to many other subjects of research.

摘要

经过多年研究,出现了两种截然不同的方法来理解驱动癌症发生的力量。这两种方法分别是体细胞突变理论(SMT)和组织组织场理论(TOFT)。SMT的核心观点是,癌症起源于单个体细胞,该体细胞相继积累了多个DNA突变,且这些突变发生在控制细胞增殖和细胞周期的基因上。因此,根据SMT,肿瘤性病变是DNA水平事件的结果。相反,根据TOFT,癌症发生主要是一个组织组织问题:致癌因素破坏了正常的组织结构,从而扰乱了细胞间信号传导并损害了基因组完整性。因此,在TOFT中,DNA突变是组织水平事件的结果而非原因。成功解决TOFT与SMT争议的至关重要性在于,根据SMT,癌症是一种单向且大多不可逆的疾病;而根据TOFT,它是可治愈且可逆的。在本文中,我们的目标是勾勒出一个合理的情景,在这个情景中,可以使用自组织临界性(SOC)的框架和概念来调和TOFT和SMT,自组织临界性原理在与自然现象、生物群落、大规模社会发展、技术网络以及许多其他研究主题相关的广泛学科中已被证明极具成效。

相似文献

1
Are the somatic mutation and tissue organization field theories of carcinogenesis incompatible?致癌作用的体细胞突变和组织组织场理论相互矛盾吗?
Cancer Inform. 2013 Dec 1;12:221-9. doi: 10.4137/CIN.S13013. eCollection 2013.
2
SMT or TOFT? How the two main theories of carcinogenesis are made (artificially) incompatible.体细胞突变理论还是组织场转化理论?致癌作用的两种主要理论是如何(人为地)变得不相容的。
Acta Biotheor. 2015 Sep;63(3):257-67. doi: 10.1007/s10441-015-9252-1. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
3
SMT and TOFT: Why and How They are Opposite and Incompatible Paradigms.同步多线程(SMT)与细粒度线程切换(TOFT):为何它们是相反且不兼容的范式以及如何如此。
Acta Biotheor. 2016 Sep;64(3):221-39. doi: 10.1007/s10441-016-9281-4. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
4
Carcinogenesis explained within the context of a theory of organisms.在生物体理论的背景下解释致癌作用。
Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2016 Oct;122(1):70-76. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
5
Global consensus theorem and self-organized criticality: unifying principles for understanding self-organization, swarm intelligence and mechanisms of carcinogenesis.全球共识定理与自组织临界性:理解自组织、群体智能及致癌机制的统一原则。
Gene Regul Syst Bio. 2013;7:23-39. doi: 10.4137/GRSB.S10885. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
6
SMT and TOFT Integrable After All: A Reply to Bizzarri and Cucina.毕竟,SMT和TOFT是可整合的:对比扎里和库奇纳的回应。
Acta Biotheor. 2017 Mar;65(1):81-85. doi: 10.1007/s10441-016-9286-z. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
7
[Cancer and the elusive cancer genes].[癌症与难以捉摸的癌症基因]
Med Sci (Paris). 2014 Jun-Jul;30(6-7):688-92. doi: 10.1051/medsci/20143006022. Epub 2014 Jul 11.
8
An Integrative Approach Toward Biology, Organisms, and Cancer.一种针对生物学、生物体和癌症的综合方法。
Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1702:15-26. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7456-6_2.
9
The tissue organization field theory of cancer: a testable replacement for the somatic mutation theory.癌症的组织组织场论:一种可测试的体细胞突变理论替代理论。
Bioessays. 2011 May;33(5):332-40. doi: 10.1002/bies.201100025.
10
A cancer theory kerfuffle can lead to new lines of research.一场癌症理论的争论可能会引发新的研究方向。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Dec 20;107(2). doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju405. Print 2015 Feb.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolution of Bioelectric Membrane Potentials: Implications in Cancer Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Strategies.生物电膜电位的演变:在癌症发病机制和治疗策略中的意义。
J Membr Biol. 2024 Dec;257(5-6):281-305. doi: 10.1007/s00232-024-00323-2. Epub 2024 Aug 25.
2
Initiation of Cancer: The Journey From Mutations in Somatic Cells to Epigenetic Changes in Tissue-resident VSELs.癌症的发生:从体细胞突变到组织驻留的 VSELs 中的表观遗传变化。
Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2024 May;20(4):857-880. doi: 10.1007/s12015-024-10694-7. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
3
Mutation or not, what directly establishes a neoplastic state, namely cellular immortality and autonomy, still remains unknown and should be prioritized in our research.无论是否发生突变,直接导致肿瘤状态(即细胞永生化和自主性)的因素仍然未知,这应该是我们研究中的优先事项。
J Cancer. 2022 Jul 4;13(9):2810-2843. doi: 10.7150/jca.72628. eCollection 2022.
4
Towards the First Principles in Biology and Cancer: New Vistas in Computational Systems Biology of Cancer.迈向生物学和癌症的首要原则:癌症计算系统生物学的新视野
Life (Basel). 2021 Dec 23;12(1):21. doi: 10.3390/life12010021.
5
Towards in-vivo label-free detection of brain tumor margins with epi-illumination tomographic quantitative phase imaging.用于通过落射照明断层定量相成像进行脑肿瘤边缘的体内无标记检测
Biomed Opt Express. 2021 Feb 25;12(3):1621-1634. doi: 10.1364/BOE.416731. eCollection 2021 Mar 1.
6
Over a century of cancer research: Inconvenient truths and promising leads.一个多世纪的癌症研究:令人不快的事实和有希望的线索。
PLoS Biol. 2020 Apr 1;18(4):e3000670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000670. eCollection 2020 Apr.
7
Process analysis of carcinogenesis: concept derivation of the tissue function "preservation of a homogeneous gene expression".癌症发生的过程分析:组织功能“保持基因表达均一性”的概念推导
Theory Biosci. 2018 Apr;137(1):85-97. doi: 10.1007/s12064-017-0256-z. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
8
An Emergence Framework of Carcinogenesis.一种癌症发生的出现框架。
Front Oncol. 2017 Sep 14;7:198. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00198. eCollection 2017.
9
Genomics, microRNA, epigenetics, and proteomics for future diagnosis, treatment and monitoring response in upper GI cancers.基因组学、微小RNA、表观遗传学和蛋白质组学在未来上消化道癌症的诊断、治疗及监测反应中的应用
Clin Transl Med. 2016 Mar;5(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40169-016-0093-6. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
10
The hallmarks of premalignant conditions: a molecular basis for cancer prevention.癌前病变的特征:癌症预防的分子基础。
Semin Oncol. 2016 Feb;43(1):22-35. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2015.09.007. Epub 2015 Sep 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Autoimmunity and cancer.自身免疫与癌症。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13 Suppl:29-40.
2
Resolution of inflammation as a novel chemopreventive strategy.将炎症消退作为一种新的化学预防策略。
Semin Immunopathol. 2013 Mar;35(2):151-61. doi: 10.1007/s00281-013-0363-y. Epub 2013 Jan 31.
3
Molecular link mechanisms between inflammation and cancer.炎症与癌症之间的分子关联机制。
Curr Pharm Des. 2012;18(26):3831-52. doi: 10.2174/138161212802083707.
4
The major transitions of life from a network perspective.从网络视角看生命的主要转变。
Front Physiol. 2012 Apr 10;3:94. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00094. eCollection 2012.
5
Cooperation-induced topological complexity: a promising road to fault tolerance and hebbian learning.合作诱导的拓扑复杂性:通往容错和赫布学习的一条充满希望的道路。
Front Physiol. 2012 Mar 16;3:52. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00052. eCollection 2012.
6
Biomolecular self-defense and futility of high-specificity therapeutic targeting.生物分子自我防御与高特异性治疗靶点的无效性
Gene Regul Syst Bio. 2011;5:89-104. doi: 10.4137/GRSB.S8542. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
7
Inflammasomes as molecular mediators of inflammation and cancer: potential role in melanoma.炎症小体作为炎症和癌症的分子介质:在黑色素瘤中的潜在作用。
Cancer Lett. 2012 Jan 1;314(1):24-33. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2011.10.001. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
8
Cause of systemic lupus erythematosus: a novel self-organized criticality theory of autoimmunity.系统性红斑狼疮的病因:一种自身免疫的新型自组织临界性理论。
Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2011 Nov;7(6):715-7. doi: 10.1586/eci.11.54.
9
TOFT better explains experimental results in cancer research than SMT (comment on DOI 10.1002/bies.201100025 and DOI 10.1002/bies.201100022).与体细胞突变理论(SMT)相比,肿瘤组织场理论(TOFT)能更好地解释癌症研究中的实验结果(评论DOI 10.1002/bies.201100025和DOI 10.1002/bies.201100022)。
Bioessays. 2011 Dec;33(12):919-21. doi: 10.1002/bies.201100124. Epub 2011 Oct 14.
10
Criticality and transmission of information in a swarm of cooperative units.群体合作单元中的信息关键度与传递
Phys Rev Lett. 2011 Aug 12;107(7):078103. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.078103.