Dagenais Christian, Malo Marie, Robert Émilie, Ouimet Mathieu, Berthelette Diane, Ridde Valéry
Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 4;8(12):e80233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080233. eCollection 2013.
Scientific knowledge can help develop interventions that improve public health. The objectives of this review are (1) to describe the status of research on knowledge transfer strategies in the field of complex social interventions in public health and (2) to identify priorities for future research in this field.
A scoping study is an exploratory study. After searching databases of bibliographic references and specialized periodicals, we summarized the relevant studies using a predetermined assessment framework. In-depth analysis focused on the following items: types of knowledge transfer strategies, fields of public health, types of publics, types of utilization, and types of research specifications.
From the 1,374 references identified, we selected 26 studies. The strategies targeted mostly administrators of organizations and practitioners. The articles generally dealt with instrumental utilization and most often used qualitative methods. In general, the bias risk for the studies is high.
Researchers need to consider the methodological challenges in this field of research in order to improve assessment of more complex knowledge transfer strategies (when they exist), not just diffusion/dissemination strategies and conceptual and persuasive utilization.
科学知识有助于开发改善公众健康的干预措施。本综述的目标是:(1)描述公共卫生领域复杂社会干预中知识转移策略的研究现状;(2)确定该领域未来研究的重点。
范围界定研究是一种探索性研究。在检索书目参考文献数据库和专业期刊后,我们使用预先确定的评估框架对相关研究进行了总结。深入分析集中在以下几个方面:知识转移策略的类型、公共卫生领域、公众类型、利用类型以及研究规范类型。
从识别出的1374篇参考文献中,我们选取了26项研究。这些策略主要针对组织管理人员和从业者。文章普遍涉及工具性利用,且大多采用定性方法。总体而言,这些研究的偏倚风险较高。
研究人员需要考虑该研究领域的方法学挑战,以便改进对更复杂知识转移策略(如果存在)的评估,而不仅仅是传播/扩散策略以及概念性和说服性利用。