Forster Dionys, Andres Christian, Verma Rajeev, Zundel Christine, Messmer Monika M, Mäder Paul
International Division, Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Frick, Switzerland.
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 4;8(12):e81039. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081039. eCollection 2013.
The debate on the relative benefits of conventional and organic farming systems has in recent time gained significant interest. So far, global agricultural development has focused on increased productivity rather than on a holistic natural resource management for food security. Thus, developing more sustainable farming practices on a large scale is of utmost importance. However, information concerning the performance of farming systems under organic and conventional management in tropical and subtropical regions is scarce. This study presents agronomic and economic data from the conversion phase (2007-2010) of a farming systems comparison trial on a Vertisol soil in Madhya Pradesh, central India. A cotton-soybean-wheat crop rotation under biodynamic, organic and conventional (with and without Bt cotton) management was investigated. We observed a significant yield gap between organic and conventional farming systems in the 1(st) crop cycle (cycle 1: 2007-2008) for cotton (-29%) and wheat (-27%), whereas in the 2(nd) crop cycle (cycle 2: 2009-2010) cotton and wheat yields were similar in all farming systems due to lower yields in the conventional systems. In contrast, organic soybean (a nitrogen fixing leguminous plant) yields were marginally lower than conventional yields (-1% in cycle 1, -11% in cycle 2). Averaged across all crops, conventional farming systems achieved significantly higher gross margins in cycle 1 (+29%), whereas in cycle 2 gross margins in organic farming systems were significantly higher (+25%) due to lower variable production costs but similar yields. Soybean gross margin was significantly higher in the organic system (+11%) across the four harvest years compared to the conventional systems. Our results suggest that organic soybean production is a viable option for smallholder farmers under the prevailing semi-arid conditions in India. Future research needs to elucidate the long-term productivity and profitability, particularly of cotton and wheat, and the ecological impact of the different farming systems.
近年来,关于传统农业和有机农业系统相对效益的争论引发了广泛关注。到目前为止,全球农业发展一直侧重于提高生产力,而非全面的自然资源管理以保障粮食安全。因此,大规模发展更具可持续性的农业实践至关重要。然而,关于热带和亚热带地区有机和传统管理下农业系统表现的信息却很匮乏。本研究展示了印度中部中央邦变性土上一个农业系统对比试验转换阶段(2007 - 2010年)的农艺和经济数据。研究了生物动力、有机和传统(有和没有转基因抗虫棉)管理下的棉花 - 大豆 - 小麦作物轮作。我们观察到,在第一个作物周期(周期1:2007 - 2008年),有机和传统农业系统之间棉花(-29%)和小麦(-27%)产量存在显著差距,而在第二个作物周期(周期2:2009 - 2010年),由于传统系统产量较低,所有农业系统中棉花和小麦产量相似。相比之下,有机大豆(一种固氮豆科植物)产量略低于传统产量(周期1为-1%,周期2为-11%)。在所有作物中平均计算,传统农业系统在周期1实现了显著更高的毛利润(+29%),而在周期2,有机农业系统的毛利润显著更高(+25%),这是由于可变生产成本较低但产量相似。与传统系统相比,在四个收获年份中,有机系统的大豆毛利润显著更高(+11%)。我们的结果表明,在印度当前的半干旱条件下,有机大豆生产对小农户来说是一个可行的选择。未来的研究需要阐明不同农业系统的长期生产力和盈利能力,特别是棉花和小麦的,以及其生态影响。