• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用混合型Hyrax-面罩组合进行上颌前牵引

Maxillary protraction using a hybrid hyrax-facemask combination.

作者信息

Nienkemper Manuel, Wilmes Benedict, Pauls Alexander, Drescher Dieter

机构信息

University of Düsseldorf, Department of orthodontics, Moorenstr, 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Prog Orthod. 2013 May 20;14(1):5. doi: 10.1186/2196-1042-14-5.

DOI:10.1186/2196-1042-14-5
PMID:24325812
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3847851/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this in study was the evaluation of treatment outcomes after using a hybrid hyrax-facemask combination in growing class III patients.

METHODS

Treatment of 16 children (mean age 9.5±1.3 years) was investigated clinically and by means of pre- and post-treatment cephalograms. Changes in sagittal and vertical, and dental and skeletal values were evaluated and tested for statistically significant differences.

RESULTS

All mini-implants remained stable during treatment. Mean treatment duration was 5.8±1.7 months. There was a significant improvement in skeletal sagittal values: SNA, +2.0°; SNB, -1.2°; ANB, +3.2°; WITS appraisal, +4.1 mm and overjet, +2.7 mm. No significant changes were found concerning vertical skeletal relationships and upper incisor inclination. In relation to A point, the upper first molars moved mesially about 0.4 mm (P=0.134).

CONCLUSIONS

The hybrid hyrax-facemask combination seems to be effective for orthopaedic treatment in growing class III patients. Unwanted maxillary dental movements can be avoided due to stable skeletal anchorage.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是评估在生长发育期的III类错颌患者中使用混合式扩弓器-面罩联合矫治器后的治疗效果。

方法

对16名儿童（平均年龄9.5±1.3岁）进行了临床研究，并通过治疗前后的头影测量片进行分析。评估矢状向、垂直向以及牙齿和骨骼数据的变化，并检验其是否存在统计学上的显著差异。

结果

治疗过程中所有微型种植体均保持稳定。平均治疗时间为5.8±1.7个月。骨骼矢状向数据有显著改善：SNA角增加2.0°；SNB角减小1.2°；ANB角增加3.2°；WITS值增加4.1 mm，覆盖增加2.7 mm。垂直向骨骼关系和上切牙倾斜度未发现显著变化。相对于A点，上颌第一磨牙近中移动约0.4 mm（P = 0.134）。

结论

混合式扩弓器-面罩联合矫治器似乎对生长发育期的III类错颌患者的正畸治疗有效。由于稳定的骨骼锚固作用，可以避免上颌牙齿不必要的移动。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af66/3847851/5f1c2a4c8329/2196-1042-14-5-7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af66/3847851/a93ae7d545c8/2196-1042-14-5-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af66/3847851/17135f3b9fe6/2196-1042-14-5-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af66/3847851/7c525b7b7eca/2196-1042-14-5-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af66/3847851/78412a3e7cdd/2196-1042-14-5-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af66/3847851/f7180a2ca192/2196-1042-14-5-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af66/3847851/4296b104e666/2196-1042-14-5-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af66/3847851/5f1c2a4c8329/2196-1042-14-5-7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af66/3847851/a93ae7d545c8/2196-1042-14-5-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af66/3847851/17135f3b9fe6/2196-1042-14-5-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af66/3847851/7c525b7b7eca/2196-1042-14-5-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af66/3847851/78412a3e7cdd/2196-1042-14-5-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af66/3847851/f7180a2ca192/2196-1042-14-5-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af66/3847851/4296b104e666/2196-1042-14-5-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af66/3847851/5f1c2a4c8329/2196-1042-14-5-7.jpg

相似文献

1
Maxillary protraction using a hybrid hyrax-facemask combination.使用混合型Hyrax-面罩组合进行上颌前牵引
Prog Orthod. 2013 May 20;14(1):5. doi: 10.1186/2196-1042-14-5.
2
The Hybrid Hyrax Distalizer, a new all-in-one appliance for rapid palatal expansion, early class III treatment and upper molar distalization.混合式Hyrax远移器，一种用于快速腭扩展、早期III类错颌治疗和上颌磨牙远移的新型一体化矫治器。
J Orthod. 2014 Sep;41 Suppl 1:S47-53. doi: 10.1179/1465313314Y.0000000107.
3
The efficacy of Hybrid Hyrax-Mentoplate combination in early Class III treatment: a novel approach and pilot study.Hyrax-颏板联合矫治器在早期III类错颌治疗中的疗效：一种新方法及初步研究
Aust Orthod J. 2016 May;32(1):88-96.
4
Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment.两种上颌前牵引方案的比较：牙支持式与骨锚式前牵引面罩治疗。
Prog Orthod. 2015;16:26. doi: 10.1186/s40510-015-0096-7. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
5
Comparative evaluation of maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage.上颌骨牵引的比较评价：带或不带骨骼锚固。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 May;139(5):636-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.06.039.
6
Application and effectiveness of a mini-implant- and tooth-borne rapid palatal expansion device: the hybrid hyrax.微型种植体和牙支持式快速腭扩展装置（混合式Hyrax）的应用及效果
World J Orthod. 2010 Winter;11(4):323-30.
7
Comparison of double-plate appliance/facemask combination and facemask therapy in treating class III malocclusions.双板矫治器/面罩联合治疗与面罩治疗Ⅲ类错颌畸形的比较。
Angle Orthod. 2015 Mar;85(2):278-83. doi: 10.2319/013114-83.1. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
8
Early Class III treatment with Hybrid-Hyrax - Facemask in comparison to Hybrid-Hyrax-Mentoplate - skeletal and dental outcomes.早期 III 类错颌的 Hybrid-Hyrax-面具治疗与 Hybrid-Hyrax-Mentoplate-骨骼和牙齿治疗的效果比较。
Prog Orthod. 2018 Oct 22;19(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s40510-018-0239-8.
9
Modified tandem traction bow appliance compared with facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions.改良串联牵引弓矫治器与面罩治疗Ⅲ类错牙合畸形的比较。
Angle Orthod. 2014 Jul;84(4):642-8. doi: 10.2319/080513-584.1. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
10
Effectiveness of maxillary protraction using a hybrid hyrax-facemask combination: a controlled clinical study.使用Hyrax矫治器-面罩联合装置进行上颌前牵引的疗效：一项对照临床研究。
Angle Orthod. 2015 Sep;85(5):764-70. doi: 10.2319/071614-497.1. Epub 2014 Nov 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Outcomes of Skeletal Anchorage Versus Conventional Anchorage in the Class III Orthopaedic Treatment in Growing Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.生长发育期患者Ⅲ类错颌正畸治疗中骨支抗与传统支抗的临床疗效：系统评价与Meta分析
Turk J Orthod. 2025 Jul 2;38(2):133-141. doi: 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2025.2024.38.
2
Temporary Anchorage Device: A Narrative Review.临时锚固装置：一篇叙述性综述。
Cureus. 2025 Apr 2;17(4):e81617. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81617. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Assessment of Maxillary Molar Tooth Changes Caused by Class III Elastics in Hybrid Hyrax-Mentoplate Treatments: A Pilot Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Application and effectiveness of a mini-implant- and tooth-borne rapid palatal expansion device: the hybrid hyrax.微型种植体和牙支持式快速腭扩展装置（混合式Hyrax）的应用及效果
World J Orthod. 2010 Winter;11(4):323-30.
2
Miniscrew-supported Class III treatment with the Hybrid RPE Advancer.使用混合式快速扩弓器的微螺钉支持的III类错颌治疗。
J Clin Orthod. 2010 Sep;44(9):533-9; quiz 561.
3
Bone thickness of the palate for orthodontic mini-implant anchorage in adults.成人正畸微型种植体支抗腭部的骨厚度
混合式Hyrax-颏板治疗中Ⅲ类弹力牵引对上颌磨牙牙齿变化的评估：一项初步研究。
Turk J Orthod. 2025 Mar 27;38(1):1-11. doi: 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2025.2024.156.
4
Effect of miniscrew-assisted maxillary protraction on width changes in the circummaxillary sutures.微型螺钉辅助上颌骨前牵引对上颌周围缝宽度变化的影响。
Angle Orthod. 2025 May 1;95(3):283-289. doi: 10.2319/081424-665.1.
5
Skeletal and dental effects of a new compliance-free appliance, the NET3 corrector, in management of skeletal Class III malocclusion compared to rapid maxillary expansion-facemask.与快速上颌扩弓-面罩相比，新型免依从性矫治器NET3矫治器在治疗骨性III类错牙合畸形中的骨骼和牙齿效应。
Angle Orthod. 2025 May 1;95(3):274-282. doi: 10.2319/121823-842.1.
6
Effect of Different Mini Implant Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion (MARPE) Designs on Maxillary Protraction in Skeletal Class III malocclusion: An FEM Study.不同微型种植体辅助快速腭中缝扩展（MARPE）设计对Ⅲ类骨性错牙合上颌前牵引的影响：一项有限元研究
Contemp Clin Dent. 2024 Jan-Mar;15(1):27-34. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_428_23. Epub 2024 Mar 23.
7
Impact of digital orthodontics on maxillary protraction with implants in children with skeletal class III: A systematic review and meta-analysis.数字化正畸对Ⅲ类骨骼型儿童种植体上颌前牵引的影响：一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Saudi Dent J. 2024 Feb;36(2):240-248. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.11.013. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
8
Comparison of the effects of different rapid maxillary expansion techniques on craniofacial structures: a finite element analysis study.不同快速上颌扩展技术对颅面结构影响的比较：有限元分析研究。
Prog Orthod. 2023 Mar 6;24(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40510-023-00459-2.
9
Temporary anchorage devices and the forces and effects on the dentition and surrounding structures during orthodontic treatment: a scoping review.正畸治疗中临时支抗装置对牙齿和周围结构的作用力和影响：范围综述。
Eur J Orthod. 2023 May 31;45(3):324-337. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjac072.
10
A retrospective comparison of two protocols for correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion in prepubertal children: hybrid hyrax expander with mandibular miniplates and rapid maxillary expansion with face mask.两种方法矫治替牙期骨性 III 类错颌畸形的回顾性比较：混合式螺旋扩弓器联合下颌骨迷你板和快速扩弓联合面具。
Prog Orthod. 2023 Jan 23;24(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40510-022-00446-z.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Apr;131(4 Suppl):S74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.09.029.
4
Success rate of mini- and micro-implants used for orthodontic anchorage: a prospective clinical study.用于正畸支抗的微型和微小种植体成功率：一项前瞻性临床研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Apr;18(2):263-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01325.x.
5
Soft-tissue and cortical-bone thickness at orthodontic implant sites.正畸种植部位的软组织和皮质骨厚度。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Aug;130(2):177-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.12.024.
6
Orthopedic protraction with skeletal anchorage in a patient with maxillary hypoplasia and hypodontia.一名上颌骨发育不全且牙齿萌出不足患者采用骨锚钉进行的正畸牵引治疗
Angle Orthod. 2006 Jan;76(1):156-63. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0156:OPWSAI]2.0.CO;2.
7
The effects of maxillary protraction therapy with or without rapid palatal expansion: a prospective, randomized clinical trial.上颌前牵引治疗联合或不联合快速腭开展的效果：一项前瞻性随机临床试验。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Sep;128(3):299-309. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.04.030.
8
The Rotterdam Palatal Distractor: introduction of the new bone-borne device and report of the pilot study.鹿特丹腭部牵张器：新型骨承载装置的介绍及初步研究报告。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Jan;35(1):31-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2005.07.002. Epub 2005 Sep 8.
9
Postpubertal assessment of treatment timing for maxillary expansion and protraction therapy followed by fixed appliances.青春期后对上颌扩弓和前牵引治疗时机的评估，随后采用固定矫治器。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Nov;126(5):555-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.10.036.
10
Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage.与用于正畸支抗的置于后部区域的钛螺钉稳定性相关的因素。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Oct;124(4):373-8. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00565-1.