• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期 III 类错颌的 Hybrid-Hyrax-面具治疗与 Hybrid-Hyrax-Mentoplate-骨骼和牙齿治疗的效果比较。

Early Class III treatment with Hybrid-Hyrax - Facemask in comparison to Hybrid-Hyrax-Mentoplate - skeletal and dental outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Heinrich-Heine-University, Kasernenstr. 1, 40213, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Private Practice, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Prog Orthod. 2018 Oct 22;19(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s40510-018-0239-8.

DOI:10.1186/s40510-018-0239-8
PMID:30345472
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6196146/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Protraction of maxilla is usually the preferred and more commonly used treatment approach for skeletal Class III with a retrognathic maxilla. The aim of this study was the comparison of the skeletal and dental effects of two skeletally borne appliances for maxillary protraction: a) Hybrid-Hyrax in combination with facemask (FM), b) Hybrid-Hyrax in combination with Mentoplate (ME).

METHODS

Thirty four Patients (17 facemask, 17 Mentoplate) were investigated by means of pre- and posttreatment cephalograms. The two groups matched with regard to treatment time, age gender and type of dentoskeletal deformity before treatment.

RESULTS

Both groups showed a significant forward movement of A-point (FM GROUP: SNA + 2.23° ± 1.30°- p 0.000*; ME: 2.23° ± 1.43°- p 0.000*). B-Point showed a larger sagittal change in the FM Group (SNB 1.51° ± 1.1°- p 0.000*) compared to the ME group (SNB: - 0.30° ± 0.9°- p 0.070). The FM group showed a significant increase of the ML-NL + 1.86° ± 1.65° (p 0.000*) and NSL-ML + 1.17° ± 1.48 (p 0.006*). Upper Incisor inclination did not change significantly during treatment in both groups as well as the distance of the first upper Molar in relation to A-point.

CONCLUSION

Both treatments achieve comparable rates of maxillary protraction, without dentoalveolar side effects. Skeletal anchorage with symphysial plates in the mandible provides greater vertical control and might be the treatment of choice in high angle patients.

摘要

背景

上颌骨的伸展通常是治疗上颌后缩的首选和更常用的方法。本研究的目的是比较两种骨骼支抗上颌骨伸展的骨骼和牙齿效果:a)Hybrid-Hyrax 与面弓(FM)联合,b)Hybrid-Hyrax 与颏兜(ME)联合。

方法

34 名患者(17 名使用面弓,17 名使用颏兜)通过治疗前后的头颅侧位片进行研究。两组在治疗时间、年龄、性别和治疗前牙颌面畸形类型方面相匹配。

结果

两组 A 点均有显著的前向移动(FM 组:SNA +2.23°±1.30°-p<0.000*;ME 组:2.23°±1.43°-p<0.000*)。B 点在 FM 组的矢状变化较大(SNB 1.51°±1.1°-p<0.000*),而在 ME 组变化较小(SNB:-0.30°±0.9°-p<0.070)。FM 组的 ML-NL 增加了 1.86°±1.65°(p<0.000*),NSL-ML 增加了 1.17°±1.48°(p<0.006*)。两组在治疗过程中上颌切牙倾斜度均无明显变化,上颌第一磨牙相对于 A 点的距离也无明显变化。

结论

两种治疗方法均能达到相似的上颌骨牵引效果,且无牙颌面副作用。下颌骨颏部的骨性支抗提供了更大的垂直控制,可能是高角患者的首选治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Early Class III treatment with Hybrid-Hyrax - Facemask in comparison to Hybrid-Hyrax-Mentoplate - skeletal and dental outcomes.早期 III 类错颌的 Hybrid-Hyrax-面具治疗与 Hybrid-Hyrax-Mentoplate-骨骼和牙齿治疗的效果比较。
Prog Orthod. 2018 Oct 22;19(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s40510-018-0239-8.
2
Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment.两种上颌前牵引方案的比较:牙支持式与骨锚式前牵引面罩治疗。
Prog Orthod. 2015;16:26. doi: 10.1186/s40510-015-0096-7. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
3
Class III malocclusion treated with a 3D-printed hybrid hyrax distalizer combined with mentoplate using Alt-RAMEC protocol: A case report.采用Alt-RAMEC方案,使用3D打印混合式扩弓器联合颏板治疗III类错牙合畸形:一例报告。
J Orthod. 2024 Jun;51(2):183-191. doi: 10.1177/14653125231184910. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
4
Maxillary protraction using a hybrid hyrax-facemask combination.使用混合型Hyrax-面罩组合进行上颌前牵引
Prog Orthod. 2013 May 20;14(1):5. doi: 10.1186/2196-1042-14-5.
5
Effectiveness of maxillary protraction using a hybrid hyrax-facemask combination: a controlled clinical study.使用Hyrax矫治器-面罩联合装置进行上颌前牵引的疗效:一项对照临床研究。
Angle Orthod. 2015 Sep;85(5):764-70. doi: 10.2319/071614-497.1. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
6
The Hybrid Hyrax Distalizer, a new all-in-one appliance for rapid palatal expansion, early class III treatment and upper molar distalization.混合式Hyrax远移器,一种用于快速腭扩展、早期III类错颌治疗和上颌磨牙远移的新型一体化矫治器。
J Orthod. 2014 Sep;41 Suppl 1:S47-53. doi: 10.1179/1465313314Y.0000000107.
7
A retrospective comparison of two protocols for correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion in prepubertal children: hybrid hyrax expander with mandibular miniplates and rapid maxillary expansion with face mask.两种方法矫治替牙期骨性 III 类错颌畸形的回顾性比较:混合式螺旋扩弓器联合下颌骨迷你板和快速扩弓联合面具。
Prog Orthod. 2023 Jan 23;24(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40510-022-00446-z.
8
Application and effectiveness of a mini-implant- and tooth-borne rapid palatal expansion device: the hybrid hyrax.微型种植体和牙支持式快速腭扩展装置(混合式Hyrax)的应用及效果
World J Orthod. 2010 Winter;11(4):323-30.
9
The efficacy of Hybrid Hyrax-Mentoplate combination in early Class III treatment: a novel approach and pilot study.Hyrax-颏板联合矫治器在早期III类错颌治疗中的疗效:一种新方法及初步研究
Aust Orthod J. 2016 May;32(1):88-96.
10
Effect of maxillary protraction with alternating rapid palatal expansion and constriction vs expansion alone in maxillary retrusive patients: a single-center, randomized controlled trial.交替快速扩弓与缩弓的上颌前牵引对上颌后缩患者的影响:一项单中心随机对照试验
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Oct;148(4):641-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.04.038.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Outcomes of Skeletal Anchorage Versus Conventional Anchorage in the Class III Orthopaedic Treatment in Growing Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.生长发育期患者Ⅲ类错颌正畸治疗中骨支抗与传统支抗的临床疗效:系统评价与Meta分析
Turk J Orthod. 2025 Jul 2;38(2):133-141. doi: 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2025.2024.38.
2
Long-term three-dimensional skeletal effects of hybrid hyrax with facemask versus mentoplate in growing Class III patients: a randomized controlled trial.在生长发育期的III类错颌患者中,比较Hyrax矫治器联合面罩与颏兜治疗的长期三维骨骼效应:一项随机对照试验
Prog Orthod. 2025 Apr 21;26(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40510-025-00561-7.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of 2 skeletally anchored maxillary protraction protocols.两种骨骼锚固上颌前牵引方案的比较评估
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Nov;150(5):751-762. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.04.025.
2
Wear-time recording during early Class III facemask treatment using TheraMon chip technology.使用TheraMon芯片技术在早期III类面罩治疗期间进行佩戴时间记录。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Sep;150(3):533-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.04.016.
3
The efficacy of Hybrid Hyrax-Mentoplate combination in early Class III treatment: a novel approach and pilot study.
Assessment of Maxillary Molar Tooth Changes Caused by Class III Elastics in Hybrid Hyrax-Mentoplate Treatments: A Pilot Study.
混合式Hyrax-颏板治疗中Ⅲ类弹力牵引对上颌磨牙牙齿变化的评估:一项初步研究。
Turk J Orthod. 2025 Mar 27;38(1):1-11. doi: 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2025.2024.156.
4
Long-term comparison of maxillary protraction with hybrid hyrax-facemask vs. hybrid hyrax-mentoplate protocols using Alt-RAMEC: a 5-year randomized controlled trial.使用Alt-RAMEC对混合式扩弓器-面罩与混合式扩弓器-颏板矫治方案进行上颌前牵引的长期比较:一项5年随机对照试验。
Eur J Orthod. 2025 Feb 7;47(2). doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjaf011.
5
Skeletal and dental effects of a new compliance-free appliance, the NET3 corrector, in management of skeletal Class III malocclusion compared to rapid maxillary expansion-facemask.与快速上颌扩弓-面罩相比,新型免依从性矫治器NET3矫治器在治疗骨性III类错牙合畸形中的骨骼和牙齿效应。
Angle Orthod. 2025 May 1;95(3):274-282. doi: 10.2319/121823-842.1.
6
Impact of different cephalometric skeletal configurations on anatomic midface parameters in adults.不同颅面骨结构对上颌骨解剖参数的影响。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Dec 29;28(1):55. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05472-7.
7
Zygomaticotemporal suture maturation evaluation in Chinese population using cone-beam computed tomography images.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描图像评估中国人群颧颞缝成熟度
Korean J Orthod. 2023 Jul 25;53(4):232-240. doi: 10.4041/kjod23.020. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
8
Dentofacial effects of miniscrew-anchored maxillary protraction on prepubertal children with maxillary deficiency: a randomized controlled trial.微螺钉支抗上颌骨前牵引对伴有上颌骨发育不足的青春期前儿童的牙颌面影响:一项随机对照试验。
Prog Orthod. 2023 Jun 12;24(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s40510-023-00473-4.
9
Concept for the Treatment of Class III Anomalies with a Skeletally Anchored Appliance Fabricated in the CAD/CAM Process-The MIRA Appliance.利用计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)工艺制作的骨锚固矫治器治疗Ⅲ类错畸形的理念——MIRA矫治器
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 May 19;10(5):616. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10050616.
10
Pain and discomfort perception during miniscrew-anchored maxillary protraction: secondary data analysis of a randomized clinical trial.微型螺钉固定上颌前牵引过程中的疼痛和不适感知:一项随机临床试验的二次数据分析
Angle Orthod. 2023 May 1;93(3):313-319. doi: 10.2319/092022-655.1.
Hyrax-颏板联合矫治器在早期III类错颌治疗中的疗效:一种新方法及初步研究
Aust Orthod J. 2016 May;32(1):88-96.
4
Effectiveness of maxillary protraction using facemask with or without maxillary expansion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.使用或不使用上颌扩弓的面罩式上颌前牵引的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2015 Jul;19(6):1181-92. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1478-4. Epub 2015 May 19.
5
Effectiveness of maxillary protraction using a hybrid hyrax-facemask combination: a controlled clinical study.使用Hyrax矫治器-面罩联合装置进行上颌前牵引的疗效:一项对照临床研究。
Angle Orthod. 2015 Sep;85(5):764-70. doi: 10.2319/071614-497.1. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
6
Short-term effects of a modified Alt-RAMEC protocol for early treatment of Class III malocclusion: a controlled study.改良Alt-RAMEC方案早期治疗Ⅲ类错牙合的短期效果:一项对照研究
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2014 Nov;17(4):259-69. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12051. Epub 2014 Jul 7.
7
Dentofacial effects of skeletal anchored treatment modalities for the correction of maxillary retrognathia.骨性支抗治疗对上颌后缩畸形的牙颌面效应。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Jan;145(1):41-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.09.009.
8
Maxillary protraction using a hybrid hyrax-facemask combination.使用混合型Hyrax-面罩组合进行上颌前牵引
Prog Orthod. 2013 May 20;14(1):5. doi: 10.1186/2196-1042-14-5.
9
The effects of face mask and tongue plate on maxillary deficiency in growing patients: a randomized clinical trial.面罩和压舌板对生长发育期患者上颌骨发育不足的影响:一项随机临床试验。
J Orthod. 2013 Jun;40(2):130-6. doi: 10.1179/1465313312Y.0000000036.
10
Is early Class III protraction facemask treatment effective? A multicentre, randomized, controlled trial: 3-year follow-up.早期III类牵引面罩治疗是否有效?一项多中心、随机、对照试验:3年随访。
J Orthod. 2012 Sep;39(3):176-85. doi: 10.1179/1465312512Z.00000000028.