Goren Amir, Liu Xianchen, Gupta Shaloo, Simon Teresa A, Phatak Hemant
1Health Outcomes Practice, Kantar Health, New York, NY; 2Global Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Pfizer Inc, New York, NY; 3Health Outcomes Practice, Kantar Health, Princeton, NJ; 4Global Pharmacovigilance and Epidemiology, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pennington, NJ; and 5Global Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ.
Am J Ther. 2015 Jul-Aug;22(4):248-56. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000000001.
Vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and aspirin (ASA) are recommended for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This study examined VKA and ASA use and their clinical correlates, including CHADS2 stroke risk scores, among adult patients with AF in the general population. Participants included 1290 (1.72%) adults reporting diagnosis with AF (mean age, 64.9 years; 65% men) from the 2009 US National Health and Wellness Survey, an online, self-administered, nationwide, stratified random sample survey of 75,000 adults. Antithrombotic use patterns, including VKA, ASA, VKA+ASA, and non-VKA/ASA, and their correlates were examined using logistic regressions. Respondents with AF were treated with VKA (26.6%), ASA (34.5%), VKA+ASA (15.4%), or neither (23.5%). Among those with CHADS2 ≥1, 19.3% did not report use of VKA or ASA. Among those with CHADS2 ≥2, 35.7% were treated only with ASA. Adjusting for covariates in logistic regressions, CHADS2 ≥1 was associated with VKA and/or ASA (vs. non-VKA/ASA) use (P ≤ 0.02), but CHADS2 score did not differentiate VKA versus ASA use (P > 0.4). Comorbidities were associated with ASA versus VKA use (P ≤ 0.01). Older age, male gender, married status, and obesity were each associated with use of at least one of the treatments investigated (all P < 0.05). One-in-five AF patients with CHADS2 ≥1 were untreated and more than one-third with CHADS2 ≥2 treated with only ASA for stroke prevention. Our findings suggest that although patient characteristics including CHADS2 score were associated with either VKA or ASA use, CHADS2 score was unrelated to VKA versus ASA treatment.
维生素K拮抗剂(VKA)和阿司匹林(ASA)被推荐用于心房颤动(AF)患者的卒中预防。本研究调查了普通人群中成年AF患者VKA和ASA的使用情况及其临床相关因素,包括CHADS2卒中风险评分。参与者包括来自2009年美国国家健康与健康调查的1290名(1.72%)报告诊断为AF的成年人(平均年龄64.9岁;65%为男性),该调查是一项针对75000名成年人的在线、自我管理、全国性、分层随机抽样调查。使用逻辑回归分析抗栓治疗使用模式,包括VKA、ASA、VKA+ASA和非VKA/ASA及其相关因素。AF患者接受VKA治疗的占26.6%,接受ASA治疗的占34.5%,接受VKA+ASA治疗的占15.4%,两者均未接受治疗的占23.5%。在CHADS2≥1的患者中,19.3%未报告使用VKA或ASA。在CHADS2≥2的患者中,35.7%仅接受ASA治疗。在逻辑回归中对协变量进行调整后,CHADS2≥1与使用VKA和/或ASA(对比非VKA/ASA)相关(P≤0.02),但CHADS2评分不能区分VKA与ASA的使用情况(P>0.4)。合并症与使用ASA而非VKA相关(P≤0.01)。年龄较大、男性、已婚状态和肥胖均与使用至少一种所研究的治疗方法相关(所有P<0.05)。五分之一CHADS2≥1的AF患者未接受治疗,超过三分之一CHADS2≥2的患者仅接受ASA预防卒中。我们的研究结果表明,尽管包括CHADS2评分在内的患者特征与使用VKA或ASA相关,但CHADS2评分与VKA和ASA治疗无关。