• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抑郁症结局影响未来护理层级的复杂性。

Future complexity of care tier affected by depression outcomes.

作者信息

Angstman Kurt B, Meunier Matthew R, Rohrer James E, Oberhelman Sara S, Maxson Julie A, Rahman Parvez A S

机构信息

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

出版信息

J Prim Care Community Health. 2014 Jan 1;5(1):30-5. doi: 10.1177/2150131913511465. Epub 2013 Nov 25.

DOI:10.1177/2150131913511465
PMID:24327598
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The inclusion of mental health issues in the evaluation of multimorbidity generally has been as the presence or absence of the condition rather than severity, complexity, or stage. The hypothesis for this study was that clinical outcome of the depression 6 months after enrollment into collaborative care management would have a role in predicting future complexity of care tier.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective chart review of 1894 primary care patients who were diagnosed with major depressive disorder or dysthymia as of December 2012. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to test the independent associations between each variable and the odds of being included in the higher tiers (HT) group.

RESULTS

Age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.022, confidence interval [CI] = 1.013-1.030, P < .001), female gender (OR = 1.380, CI = 1.020-1.868, P = .037), being married (OR = 0.730, CI = 0.563-0.947, P = .018), and the presence of comorbidities (1, OR = 1.986, CI = 1.485-2.656, P < .001; ≥ 2, OR = 4.678, CI = 3.242-6.750, P < .001) were independently associated with future HT levels. The presence of persistent depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 ≥ 10) at 6 months conferred 2.280 (CI = 1.673-3.107, P < .001) times likely odds of HT level compared with clinical remission at 6 months.

CONCLUSION

Patients with the diagnosis of major depression or dysthymia had greater odds of complex tier levels in the future, if depression was not treated to remission by 6 months. This study demonstrated the importance of the goal of significant improvement (ie, remission) of depression symptoms by 6 months (especially those older patients with more comorbidity) from entering into the higher complexity tiers.

摘要

背景

在评估多种疾病共病时,心理健康问题通常仅被视为该疾病是否存在,而非其严重程度、复杂性或阶段。本研究的假设是,纳入协作式护理管理6个月后的抑郁症临床结局,将对预测未来护理层级的复杂性起到作用。

方法

本研究是一项回顾性病历审查,研究对象为截至2012年12月被诊断患有重度抑郁症或心境恶劣障碍的1894名初级护理患者。采用多元逻辑回归分析来检验每个变量与被纳入更高层级(HT)组的几率之间的独立关联。

结果

年龄(比值比[OR]=1.022,置信区间[CI]=1.013 - 1.030,P<.001)、女性(OR = 1.380,CI = 1.020 - 1.868,P = .037)、已婚(OR = 0.730,CI = 0.563 - 0.947,P = .018)以及存在共病(1种,OR = 1.986,CI = 1.485 - 2.656,P<.001;≥2种,OR = 4.678,CI = 3.242 - 6.750,P<.001)与未来的HT水平独立相关。与6个月时临床缓解相比,6个月时存在持续性抑郁症状(患者健康问卷-9[PHQ-9]≥10)的患者处于HT层级的几率高2.280倍(CI = 1.673 - 3.107,P<.001)。

结论

如果重度抑郁症或心境恶劣障碍患者在6个月时抑郁症未治疗至缓解,那么其未来处于复杂护理层级的几率更高。本研究表明,对于进入更高复杂性护理层级而言,在6个月时(尤其是那些患有更多共病的老年患者)使抑郁症状显著改善(即缓解)这一目标具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
Future complexity of care tier affected by depression outcomes.抑郁症结局影响未来护理层级的复杂性。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2014 Jan 1;5(1):30-5. doi: 10.1177/2150131913511465. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
2
Age of depressed patient does not affect clinical outcome in collaborative care management.抑郁患者的年龄并不影响协作式护理管理的临床结局。
Postgrad Med. 2011 Sep;123(5):122-8. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2011.09.2467.
3
Prolonged care management for depression: a case-controlled study of those enrolled for more than one year.抑郁症的长期护理管理:一项针对登记超过一年者的病例对照研究。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2013 Apr 1;4(2):129-34. doi: 10.1177/2150131913475667. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
4
Inter-relationship of the functional status question of the PHQ-9 and depression remission after six months of collaborative care management.PHQ-9 功能状态问题与协同护理管理六个月后抑郁缓解的相关性。
J Psychiatr Res. 2013 Mar;47(3):418-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.12.003. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
5
Patient body mass index does not predict six-month clinical outcome of depression managed under collaborative care.患者体重指数无法预测在协作护理模式下管理的抑郁症患者的六个月临床结局。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2013 Apr 1;4(2):119-23. doi: 10.1177/2150131912454012. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
6
Effects of concurrent low back conditions on depression outcomes.并发的下背部疾病对抑郁结局的影响。
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2013 Jul;113(7):530-7. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2013.004.
7
Personality Disorders in Primary Care: Impact on Depression Outcomes Within Collaborative Care.初级保健中的人格障碍:对协作护理中抑郁症治疗结果的影响
J Prim Care Community Health. 2017 Oct;8(4):233-238. doi: 10.1177/2150131917714929. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
8
Patient self-assessment factors predictive of persistent depressive symptoms 6 months after enrollment in collaborative care management.患者自我评估因素预测协作式护理管理登记后 6 个月的持续抑郁症状。
Depress Anxiety. 2013 Feb;30(2):143-8. doi: 10.1002/da.22020. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
9
A fidelity measure for integrated management of depression in primary care.基层医疗中抑郁症综合管理的一种保真度测量方法。
Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11):1030-7. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000233683.82254.63.
10
Seasonal variation in clinical remission of primary care patients with depression: impact of gender.原发性护理抑郁症患者临床缓解的季节性变化:性别的影响。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2015 Feb;21(1):160-5. doi: 10.1111/jep.12265. Epub 2014 Sep 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Definition of patient complexity in adults: A narrative review.成人患者复杂性的定义:一项叙述性综述。
J Multimorb Comorb. 2022 Feb 25;12:26335565221081288. doi: 10.1177/26335565221081288. eCollection 2022.