Chung Shin Hye, Lee Soo Yoon, Ju Woong, Kim Seung Cheol
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2013 Jul;56(4):234-41. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2013.56.4.234. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
To compare accuracy of serum human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) levels with cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) levels as biomarkers for ovarian cancer.
The study population included 94 Korean women, including 32 patients with a diagnosis of ovarian cancer and 62 patients with a diagnosis of benign ovarian tumor. All diagnoses were confirmed by histopathological analysis. Serum HE4 levels were assessed using an HE4 enzyme immunoassay, which were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Serum CA-125 levels were determined using a Modular analytics E170 module.
The median serum CA-125 and HE4 levels were significantly higher in patients with ovarian cancer than those with other benign tumors (CA-125, 394.1 U/mL vs. 22.7 U/mL; HE4, 56.7 pM vs. 18.5 pM; P < 0.05 in both). An additional comparison revealed that the patients with endometriosis had greater median serum CA-125 levels than those with other benign ovarian tumors (32.0 U/mL vs. 17.9 U/mL, P = 0.03). Conversely, the median serum HE4 levels were similar among the two benign ovarian tumor groups, with no statistically significant difference observed (19.0 pM vs. 18.2 pM, P = 0.49). The receiver operating characteristics curve analysis for the benign ovarian tumor and ovarian cancer patients showed that HE4 showed a greater area under the curve with borderline significance when compared with CA-125 in both groups (0.93 vs. 0.85).
Serum HE4 levels may not only allow for the detection of ovarian cancer, but also allow for better differentiation of cases of ovarian cancer versus other benign ovarian tumors compared with serum CA-125.
比较血清人附睾蛋白4(HE4)水平与癌抗原125(CA - 125)水平作为卵巢癌生物标志物的准确性。
研究人群包括94名韩国女性,其中32例诊断为卵巢癌,62例诊断为良性卵巢肿瘤。所有诊断均经组织病理学分析证实。血清HE4水平采用HE4酶免疫测定法评估,按照制造商说明进行操作。血清CA - 125水平使用Modular analytics E170模块测定。
卵巢癌患者的血清CA - 125和HE4中位数水平显著高于其他良性肿瘤患者(CA - 125,394.1 U/mL对22.7 U/mL;HE4,56.7 pM对18.5 pM;两者P均<0.05)。进一步比较发现,子宫内膜异位症患者的血清CA - 125中位数水平高于其他良性卵巢肿瘤患者(32.0 U/mL对17.9 U/mL,P = 0.03)。相反,两个良性卵巢肿瘤组的血清HE4中位数水平相似,未观察到统计学显著差异(19.0 pM对18.2 pM,P = 0.49)。对良性卵巢肿瘤和卵巢癌患者的受试者工作特征曲线分析表明,与CA - 125相比,HE4在两组中的曲线下面积更大且具有临界显著性(0.93对0.85)。
与血清CA - 125相比,血清HE4水平不仅可用于检测卵巢癌,还能更好地区分卵巢癌与其他良性卵巢肿瘤病例。