Lock Martin, Alvira Mauricio R, Chen Shu-Jen, Wilson James M
Gene Therapy Program, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Division of Transfusion Medicine, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Hum Gene Ther Methods. 2014 Apr;25(2):115-25. doi: 10.1089/hgtb.2013.131. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
Accurate titration of adeno-associated viral (AAV) vector genome copies is critical for ensuring correct and reproducible dosing in both preclinical and clinical settings. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) is the current method of choice for titrating AAV genomes because of the simplicity, accuracy, and robustness of the assay. However, issues with qPCR-based determination of self-complementary AAV vector genome titers, due to primer-probe exclusion through genome self-annealing or through packaging of prematurely terminated defective interfering (DI) genomes, have been reported. Alternative qPCR, gel-based, or Southern blotting titering methods have been designed to overcome these issues but may represent a backward step from standard qPCR methods in terms of simplicity, robustness, and precision. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) is a new PCR technique that directly quantifies DNA copies with an unparalleled degree of precision and without the need for a standard curve or for a high degree of amplification efficiency; all properties that lend themselves to the accurate quantification of both single-stranded and self-complementary AAV genomes. Here we compare a ddPCR-based AAV genome titer assay with a standard and an optimized qPCR assay for the titration of both single-stranded and self-complementary AAV genomes. We demonstrate absolute quantification of single-stranded AAV vector genomes by ddPCR with up to 4-fold increases in titer over a standard qPCR titration but with equivalent readout to an optimized qPCR assay. In the case of self-complementary vectors, ddPCR titers were on average 5-, 1.9-, and 2.3-fold higher than those determined by standard qPCR, optimized qPCR, and agarose gel assays, respectively. Droplet digital PCR-based genome titering was superior to qPCR in terms of both intra- and interassay precision and is more resistant to PCR inhibitors, a desirable feature for in-process monitoring of early-stage vector production and for vector genome biodistribution analysis in inhibitory tissues.
准确滴定腺相关病毒(AAV)载体基因组拷贝数对于确保临床前和临床环境中正确且可重复的给药剂量至关重要。定量PCR(qPCR)因其检测方法的简便性、准确性和稳健性,是目前滴定AAV基因组的首选方法。然而,已有报道称,基于qPCR测定自我互补AAV载体基因组滴度存在问题,这是由于基因组自我退火或过早终止的缺陷干扰(DI)基因组包装导致引物 - 探针排除。为克服这些问题,已设计了替代的qPCR、基于凝胶或Southern印迹滴定方法,但在简便性、稳健性和精度方面,可能比标准qPCR方法退步。液滴数字PCR(ddPCR)是一种新的PCR技术,可直接以无与伦比的精度定量DNA拷贝数,无需标准曲线或高度的扩增效率;所有这些特性都有助于准确量化单链和自我互补的AAV基因组。在此,我们比较了基于ddPCR的AAV基因组滴度测定法与标准和优化的qPCR测定法,用于滴定单链和自我互补的AAV基因组。我们证明了通过ddPCR对单链AAV载体基因组进行绝对定量,其滴度比标准qPCR滴定法提高了4倍,但读数与优化的qPCR测定法相当。对于自我互补载体,ddPCR滴度分别比标准qPCR、优化的qPCR和琼脂糖凝胶测定法所确定的滴度平均高5倍、1.9倍和2.3倍。基于液滴数字PCR的基因组滴度测定在批内和批间精度方面均优于qPCR,并且对PCR抑制剂更具抗性,这对于早期载体生产过程监测和抑制性组织中的载体基因组生物分布分析而言是一个理想的特性。