• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

二维印象管理指数(BIMI):衡量印象管理的能动型和社交型形式。

The Bidimensional Impression Management Index (BIMI): measuring agentic and communal forms of impression management.

作者信息

Blasberg Sabrina A, Rogers Katherine H, Paulhus Delroy L

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 2014;96(5):523-31. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2013.862252.

DOI:10.1080/00223891.2013.862252
PMID:24328818
Abstract

Measures of impression management have yet to incorporate two-factor models of person perception. The 2 primary factors are often labeled agency and communion. In Study 1, we assembled a new measure of impression management—the Bidimensional Impression Management Index (BIMI): It comprises 2 subscales designed specifically to tap agentic and communal content. Both subscales showed adequate alpha reliabilities under both honest and faking conditions. In Study 2, the BIMI was cross-validated in a new sample: The subscales remained relatively independent, and their reliabilities remained solid. A coherent pattern of personality correlates also supported the validities of both subscales. In Study 3, the differential sensitivity of the 2 subscales was demonstrated by manipulating the job type in simulated job applications. Implications and applications of the BIMI are discussed.

摘要

印象管理的测量方法尚未纳入人际知觉的双因素模型。这两个主要因素通常被标记为能动性和共融性。在研究1中,我们编制了一种新的印象管理测量方法——二维印象管理指数(BIMI):它由两个专门设计用于挖掘能动性和共融性内容的子量表组成。在诚实和伪装条件下,两个子量表都显示出足够的阿尔法信度。在研究2中,BIMI在一个新样本中进行了交叉验证:子量表保持相对独立,其信度依然可靠。人格相关性的连贯模式也支持了两个子量表的效度。在研究3中,通过在模拟求职申请中操纵工作类型,证明了两个子量表的差异敏感性。讨论了BIMI的意义和应用。

相似文献

1
The Bidimensional Impression Management Index (BIMI): measuring agentic and communal forms of impression management.二维印象管理指数(BIMI):衡量印象管理的能动型和社交型形式。
J Pers Assess. 2014;96(5):523-31. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2013.862252.
2
Communal narcissism.集体自恋。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Nov;103(5):854-78. doi: 10.1037/a0029629. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
3
Social desirability scales as indicators of self-enhancement and impression management.作为自我提升和印象管理指标的社会赞许性量表。
J Pers Assess. 2014;96(5):532-43. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2014.916714. Epub 2014 May 16.
4
Agency-communion and self-esteem relations are moderated by culture, religiosity, age, and sex: evidence for the "self-centrality breeds self-enhancement" principle.机构-交流与自尊的关系受到文化、宗教信仰、年龄和性别的调节:“自我中心促进自我提升”原则的证据。
J Pers. 2013 Jun;81(3):261-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00807.x. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
5
Agentic and communal personality traits: relations to disordered eating behavior, body shape concern, and depressive symptoms.能动型和社群型人格特质:与饮食失调行为、体型关注及抑郁症状的关系。
Eat Behav. 2008 Dec;9(4):497-500. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2008.04.002. Epub 2008 Apr 10.
6
Getting along or ahead: Effects of gender identity threat on communal and agentic self-presentations.相处还是领先:性别认同威胁对社交性和能动性自我展示的影响。
Scand J Psychol. 2016 Oct;57(5):427-32. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12310. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
7
Agentic and communal values: their scope and measurement.主体间性价值与共同体价值:内涵与测量
J Pers Assess. 2012;94(1):39-52. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2011.627968.
8
Agentic and communal traits and health: adolescents with and without diabetes.能动性和共通性特质与健康:有和无糖尿病的青少年。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 Apr;38(4):415-28. doi: 10.1177/0146167211427149. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
9
How the adoption of impression management goals alters impression formation.印象管理目标的采用如何改变印象形成。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 Nov;36(11):1543-54. doi: 10.1177/0146167210385008. Epub 2010 Oct 4.
10
Adolescent Communal Narcissism and Peer Perceptions.青少年的公共自恋和同伴看法。
J Pers. 2017 Dec;85(6):782-792. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12287. Epub 2016 Dec 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Moral Intelligence: Construction of a Moral Intelligence Scale Developed in Poland.道德智力:波兰开发的道德智力量表的构建。
J Relig Health. 2025 Sep 8. doi: 10.1007/s10943-025-02434-z.
2
Personality testing of large language models: limited temporal stability, but highlighted prosociality.大语言模型的人格测试:时间稳定性有限,但亲社会性突出。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Oct 9;11(10):240180. doi: 10.1098/rsos.240180. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Porn or Partner Arousal? When It Comes to Romantic Relationships, Not All Sexual Arousal Is Equal: A Prospective Study.
色情片还是伴侣唤起?当涉及到浪漫关系时,并非所有的性唤起都是平等的:一项前瞻性研究。
Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Oct;53(9):3451-3460. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-02985-4. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
4
A Narcissism/Vanity Distinction? Reassessing Vanity Using a Modern Model of Narcissism Based on Pride, Empathy, and Social Behaviors.自恋与虚荣的区别?基于骄傲、同理心和社会行为的现代自恋模型重新评估虚荣
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Sep 14;13(9):762. doi: 10.3390/bs13090762.
5
Evaluation of warning strategies to reduce faking during military recruitment.评估在军事招募过程中减少伪装行为的警示策略。
Mil Psychol. 2024 Nov;36(6):606-616. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2023.2243364. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
6
Binge drinking indirectly predicts a negative emotional memory bias through coping motivations and depressive symptoms: The role of sex/gender.暴饮通过应对动机和抑郁症状间接预测负面情绪记忆偏差:性别角色
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 21;13:998364. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.998364. eCollection 2022.
7
Facets of the Fundamental Content Dimensions: Agency with Competence and Assertiveness-Communion with Warmth and Morality.基本内容维度的各个方面:具备能力与自信的能动性——兼具温暖与道德的亲和性。
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 22;7:1810. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01810. eCollection 2016.