• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我的职责是什么?关于注册护士轮班期间沟通行为的文献叙事综述与综合分析

What's my line? A narrative review and synthesis of the literature on Registered Nurses' communication behaviours between shifts.

作者信息

Kitson Alison L, Muntlin Athlin Åsa, Elliott Janice, Cant Megan L

机构信息

The University of Adelaide - School of Nursing, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 2014 Jun;70(6):1228-42. doi: 10.1111/jan.12321. Epub 2013 Dec 11.

DOI:10.1111/jan.12321
PMID:24329886
Abstract

AIM

To describe, appraise and synthesize the seminal and empirical literature around Registered Nurses' communication behaviours between shifts in acute hospital settings.

BACKGROUND

Effective communication between shifts (at nursing handover) is acknowledged as a prerequisite to safe and high-quality patient-centred care. However, gaps and inconsistencies continue to prevail.

DESIGN

Narrative review and synthesis.

DATA SOURCES

The electronic databases PubMED, CINAHL and Scopus were used.

REVIEW METHODS

English language, peer-reviewed papers published between 1970-April 2012 were considered for review. Criteria included Registered Nurses' communication during handovers in adult hospital settings.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine papers were reviewed. The research lacks a clear conceptual framework to define the core purposes of Nurses' communication behaviours between shifts. Seven themes were identified: overall purpose; report givers and receivers; seeing the whole picture; teaching and education; language; patient-centred care; and social cohesion. Two main communication processes are required - one articulating the whole picture and the other detailing information about patients.

CONCLUSION

This area of research is challenged by lack of consistency in terminology and methodological rigour. While recent research has confirmed the findings from the seminal work, it has not been able to elaborate on some of the key challenges to refine the knowledge base. A more integrated approach is required to understand the complex process of improving nursing communication behaviours, particularly around the nursing handover. A neglected area of study is the role of the unit lead in determining the communication standards of the whole nursing team.

摘要

目的

描述、评估并综合急性医院环境中注册护士轮班期间沟通行为的开创性及实证文献。

背景

轮班期间(护理交接班时)的有效沟通被认为是以患者为中心的安全、高质量护理的前提条件。然而,差距和不一致现象仍然普遍存在。

设计

叙述性综述与综合分析。

数据来源

使用了电子数据库PubMed、CINAHL和Scopus。

综述方法

纳入1970年至2012年4月期间发表的英文、经同行评审的论文进行综述。标准包括成人医院环境中注册护士在交接班时的沟通情况。

结果

共审查了29篇论文。该研究缺乏一个明确的概念框架来界定护士轮班期间沟通行为的核心目的。确定了七个主题:总体目的;报告者与接收者;全面了解情况;教学与教育;语言;以患者为中心的护理;以及社会凝聚力。需要两个主要的沟通流程——一个阐述整体情况,另一个详细说明患者信息。

结论

该研究领域受到术语不一致和方法严谨性不足的挑战。虽然近期研究证实了开创性研究的结果,但未能详细阐述一些关键挑战以完善知识库内容。需要一种更综合的方法来理解改善护理沟通行为的复杂过程,尤其是围绕护理交接班的过程。一个被忽视的研究领域是科室负责人在确定整个护理团队沟通标准方面的作用。

相似文献

1
What's my line? A narrative review and synthesis of the literature on Registered Nurses' communication behaviours between shifts.我的职责是什么?关于注册护士轮班期间沟通行为的文献叙事综述与综合分析
J Adv Nurs. 2014 Jun;70(6):1228-42. doi: 10.1111/jan.12321. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
2
Nurse perceptions of person-centered handovers in the oncological inpatient setting: A qualitative study.护士对肿瘤住院患者环境中以患者为中心的交接班的看法:一项定性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Oct;86:44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
3
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
4
'Being in the know': Nurses' perspectives on the role of 'end-of-shift' verbal handover.“知情”:护士对“轮班结束”口头交接角色的看法。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2017 Jun;15(2):69-78. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000102.
5
The practice of clinical handover: a respite perspective.临床交接班实践:一种缓解视角。
Br J Nurs. 2014;23(13):733-7. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2014.23.13.733.
6
Nurses discuss bedside handover and using written handover sheets.护士讨论床边交接班和使用书面交接班表。
J Nurs Manag. 2013 Jan;21(1):121-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2012.01438.x. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
7
Swedish Registered Nurses' incentives to use nursing diagnoses in clinical practice.瑞典注册护士在临床实践中使用护理诊断的动机。
J Clin Nurs. 2006 Aug;15(8):936-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01459.x.
8
Medication communication between nurses and patients during nursing handovers on medical wards: a critical ethnographic study.护士交接班时在医疗病房与患者之间的用药沟通:一项关键民族志研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Aug;49(8):941-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.02.008. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
9
Review article: Improving the hospital clinical handover between paramedics and emergency department staff in the deteriorating patient.综述文章:改善病情恶化患者的急救人员与急诊科医护人员之间的医院临床交接。
Emerg Med Australas. 2013 Oct;25(5):393-405. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12120. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
10
Clinical handovers between prehospital and hospital staff: literature review.院前与医院工作人员之间的临床交接:文献综述
Emerg Med J. 2015 Jul;32(7):577-81. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-203165. Epub 2014 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
SBAR Shift Report Training Program and its Effect on Nurses' Knowledge and Practice and Their Perception of Shift Handoff Communication.SBAR交班报告培训项目及其对护士知识、实践以及她们对交班沟通认知的影响。
SAGE Open Nurs. 2023 Feb 23;9:23779608231159340. doi: 10.1177/23779608231159340. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
2
Huddles and their effectiveness at the frontlines of clinical care: a scoping review.临床护理前沿的团队协作及其效果:综述
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Sep;36(9):2772-2783. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06632-9. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
3
Team social cohesion, professionalism, and patient-centeredness: Gendered care work, with special reference to elderly care - a mixed methods study.
团队社会凝聚力、专业精神和以患者为中心:性别化护理工作,特别提及老年护理——一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jun 2;17(1):381. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2326-9.