Suppr超能文献

[嗅觉棒嗅觉心理物理学测量的临床应用]

[Clinical application of Sniffin' Sticks olfactory psychophysical measurements].

作者信息

Yang Ling, Wei Yong-Xiang, Ren Yuan-Yuan, Yu Di, Sun Yan-Xia, Yang Bin-Bin

机构信息

Medical Research Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100029, China. Email:

出版信息

Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Sep;48(9):741-5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To establish the normal value of Sniffin' Sticks test in Chinese population and to explore it's clinical application in China.

METHODS

One hundred and five healthy volunteers were choosen from the department of physical examination of Beijing Tongren Hospital between 2007 and 2013. Another 165 patients complained of abnormal olfactory function were obtained from the outpatient clinic of the department of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery in the same period and were divided into two groups: 92 in hyposmia and 73 in functional anosmia group. The 270 subjects were divided into 3 subgroups:younger group ( <35 years of age), middle-age group (35-55 years of age) and older group ( > 55 years of age). The olfactory functions were examined with Sniffin' Sticks test and T & T test, respectively. All analyses were performed using SPSS 12.0 software.

RESULTS

For the normal value of Sniffin' Sticks test, TDI score was > 30.12 for younger group, > 27.37 for middle-age group and > 20.43 for older group; the mean TDI score was 32.12 ± 3.95 for healthy group, 17.52 ± 10.37 for hyposmia and 3.56 ± 3.49 for functional anosmia group; the differences in TDI score, olfactory threshold, discrimination threshold and identification threshold between healthy group and olfactory dysfunction group with different ages had statistical significance (Younger group: FTDI = 125.136, P = 0.000; FT = 49.454, P = 0.000;FD = 89.037, P = 0.000; FI = 39.888, P = 0.000; Middle-age group: FTDI = 190.240, P = 0.000; FT = 128.374, P = 0.000;FD = 174.122, P = 0.000;FI = 178.945, P = 0.000;Older group: FTDI = 72.992, P = 0.000; FT = 26.599, P = 0.000; FD = 77.119, P = 0.000; FI = 88.107, P = 0.000, respectively) . The mean T & T value was -1.00 ± 0.98 for healthy group, 2.27 ± 2.01 for hyposmia and 5.89 ± 0.14 for functional anosmia group. T & T score between healthy group and olfactory dysfunction group with different ages had statistical significance (Fyounger = 158.144, P = 0.000; Fmiddle-age = 247.695, P = 0.000; Folder = 70.579, P = 0.000, respectively). TDI score of the Sniffin' Sticks test result was correlated with T & T value (r = -0.927, P < 0.01); T & T threshold was correlated with the olfactory threshold, discrimination threshold and identification threshold of Sniffin' Sticks test (rT = -0.846, P < 0.01, rD = -0.908 P < 0.01, rI = -0.864, P < 0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Sniffin' Sticks test and T & T olfactometry are able to differentiate normosmia from hyposmia and anosmia with high reliability and consistency in test results.Sniffin' Sticks test can assess subject's olfactory function status more thoroughly and is suitable for application in Chinese population.

摘要

目的

建立嗅棒测试在中国人群中的正常值,并探讨其在中国的临床应用。

方法

选取2007年至2013年期间在北京同仁医院体检科的105名健康志愿者。同期从耳鼻咽喉头颈外科门诊选取165例主诉嗅觉功能异常的患者,分为两组:嗅觉减退组92例,功能性嗅觉丧失组73例。将这270名受试者分为3个亚组:青年组(<35岁)、中年组(35 - 55岁)和老年组(>55岁)。分别采用嗅棒测试和T&T测试对嗅觉功能进行检测。所有分析均使用SPSS 12.0软件进行。

结果

对于嗅棒测试的正常值,青年组TDI评分>30.12,中年组>27.37,老年组>20.43;健康组平均TDI评分为32.12±3.95,嗅觉减退组为17.52±10.37,功能性嗅觉丧失组为3.56±3.49;不同年龄的健康组与嗅觉功能障碍组在TDI评分、嗅觉阈值、辨别阈值和识别阈值方面的差异具有统计学意义(青年组:FTDI = 125.136,P = 0.000;FT = 49.454,P = 0.000;FD = 89.037,P = 0.000;FI = 39.888,P = 0.000;中年组:FTDI = 190.240,P = 0.000;FT = 128.374,P = 0.000;FD = 174.122,P = 0.000;FI = 178.945,P = 0.000;老年组:FTDI = 72.992,P = 0.000;FT = 26.599,P = 0.000;FD = 77.119,P = 0.000;FI = 88.107,P = 0.000)。健康组平均T&T值为 -1.00±0.98,嗅觉减退组为2.27±2.01,功能性嗅觉丧失组为5.89±0.14。不同年龄的健康组与嗅觉功能障碍组之间的T&T评分具有统计学意义(青年组F = 158.144,P = 0.000;中年组F = 247.695,P = 0.000;老年组F = 70.579,P = 0.000)。嗅棒测试结果的TDI评分与T&T值相关(r = -0.927,P < 0.01);T&T阈值与嗅棒测试的嗅觉阈值、辨别阈值和识别阈值相关(rT = -0.846, P < 0.01, rD = -0.908, P < 0.01, rI = -0.864, P < 0.01)。

结论

嗅棒测试和T&T嗅觉测量法能够高度可靠且一致地区分正常嗅觉与嗅觉减退和嗅觉丧失。嗅棒测试能更全面地评估受试者的嗅觉功能状态,适用于中国人群。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验