Suppr超能文献

使用“嗅棒”进行嗅觉功能的自我评估。

Self-assessment of olfactory function using the "Sniffin' Sticks".

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Smell and Taste Clinic, Technical University of Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Aug;280(8):3673-3685. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-07872-7. Epub 2023 Feb 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A precise and reliable test of the olfactory function is indispensable for the diagnosis of the olfactory disorder (OD). Despite of this, in a clinical context, often there is no place in daily routine for time-consuming procedures. This study aimed to examine if the assessment of olfactory function using the "Sniffin' Sticks" is suitable for self-assessment.

METHODS

Participants comprised 84 healthy control subjects (HC) and 37 OD patients. The "Sniffin' Sticks" test battery consisting of odor threshold (T), discrimination (D) and identification (I) tests was used for self- and assisted assessments. To save time, we applied the 8-item wide step version of the T test and the 8-item D test, whereas the I task remained the same as the original version. The whole test included two sessions, with each session comprising a self-assessment part performed by the participants themselves, and an assisted-assessment part performed by the examiner.

RESULTS

Sniffin' Sticks self-assessment was efficient in distinguishing between self-reported HC subjects and OD patients (p's < 0.01), and the scores did not differ significantly from the assisted-assessment (p's > 0.05). In the self-administered I and TDI tests, there was a moderate to excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.51-0.93, p's < 0.01), and a strong to excellent correlation with the assisted assessment (r = 0.71-0.92, p's < 0.01). However, the self-administered T and D tests only exhibited low to moderate test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.30-0.72, p's < 0.05) and correlations with the assisted test (r = 0.31-0.62, p's < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The Identification self-test is appropriate to be solely applied, and is therefore an easy-to-use alternative for olfactory screening in a larger segment of patients. The whole "Sniffin' Sticks" self-test also shows good measurement properties and is therefore a suitable backup in clinical practice, but improvement is needed due to the simplified D and T self-test.

摘要

背景

对于嗅觉障碍(OD)的诊断,精确可靠的嗅觉测试是必不可少的。尽管如此,在临床环境中,日常工作中通常没有时间进行耗时的程序。本研究旨在检查使用“Sniffin' Sticks”评估嗅觉功能是否适合自我评估。

方法

参与者包括 84 名健康对照(HC)和 37 名 OD 患者。使用由嗅觉阈值(T)、辨别(D)和识别(I)测试组成的“Sniffin' Sticks”测试组合进行自我和辅助评估。为了节省时间,我们应用了 T 测试的 8 项宽步版本和 D 测试的 8 项,而 I 任务与原始版本相同。整个测试包括两个阶段,每个阶段包括参与者自己进行的自我评估部分和由检查者进行的辅助评估部分。

结果

Sniffin' Sticks 自我评估能够有效地区分自我报告的 HC 受试者和 OD 患者(p 值均<0.01),并且评分与辅助评估无显著差异(p 值均>0.05)。在自我管理的 I 和 TDI 测试中,测试-重测信度为中度至极好(ICC=0.51-0.93,p 值均<0.01),与辅助评估具有很强到极好的相关性(r=0.71-0.92,p 值均<0.01)。然而,自我管理的 T 和 D 测试仅表现出低到中度的测试-重测信度(ICC=0.30-0.72,p 值均<0.05)和与辅助测试的相关性(r=0.31-0.62,p 值均<0.05)。

结论

识别自我测试适合单独应用,因此是较大患者群体嗅觉筛查的一种易于使用的替代方法。整个“Sniffin' Sticks”自我测试也具有良好的测量特性,因此是临床实践中的合适备用方法,但由于简化的 D 和 T 自我测试,需要进行改进。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f50e/10313570/f52505da03d2/405_2023_7872_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验