Faculty of Psychology, Espinardo Campus, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain.
Faculty of Health Sciences, Campus de Los Jerónimos, Catholic University of Murcia, 30107 Murcia, Spain.
J Anxiety Disord. 2014 Jan;28(1):31-44. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2013.10.007. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
The aim of this paper is to present a meta-analysis about the differential efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), pharmacological and combined treatment for pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The literature research and the application of the inclusion criteria enabled us to locate 18 studies, yielding a total of 24 independent comparisons between a treated (10 pharmacological, 11 CBT, and 3 combined interventions) and a control group. All types of interventions were efficacious in reducing obsessive-compulsive symptoms, with effect sizes adjusted by the type of control group of d=1.203 for CBT, d=0.745 for pharmacological treatments, and d=1.704 for mixed treatments. Depression, anxiety and other secondary responses were also improved, especially with CBT interventions. The analysis of moderator variables showed that the CBT protocol and the total of intervention hours exhibited a significant influence on the effect size. Within pharmacological treatment, clomipramine (d=1.305) was more efficacious than selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (d=0.644), but its adverse effects were more severe. Finally, the clinical implications of the results are discussed.
本文旨在对认知行为疗法(CBT)、药物治疗和联合治疗在儿童强迫症(OCD)中的疗效差异进行荟萃分析。通过文献研究和应用纳入标准,我们找到了 18 项研究,共涉及 24 个独立的治疗组(10 项药物治疗,11 项 CBT,3 项联合干预)与对照组之间的比较。所有类型的干预措施在减轻强迫症症状方面都有效,调整后的效应大小为 CBT 为 d=1.203,药物治疗为 d=0.745,混合治疗为 d=1.704。抑郁、焦虑和其他次要反应也得到了改善,尤其是 CBT 干预。对调节变量的分析表明,CBT 方案和干预总时长对效应大小有显著影响。在药物治疗中,氯米帕明(d=1.305)比选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(d=0.644)更有效,但副作用更严重。最后,讨论了结果的临床意义。