• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜下跗骨管减压术的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价

Outcomes and safety of endoscopic tarsal tunnel decompression: a systematic review.

作者信息

Gkotsoulias Efthymios N, Simonson Devin C, Roukis Thomas S

机构信息

Department of Medical Education, Gundersen Medical Foundation (ENG, DCS), La Crosse, Wisconsin.

出版信息

Foot Ankle Spec. 2014 Feb;7(1):57-60. doi: 10.1177/1938640013514267. Epub 2013 Dec 10.

DOI:10.1177/1938640013514267
PMID:24334368
Abstract

Open surgical decompression of the tarsal tunnel is the standard surgical approach for compression of the tibial nerve within the tarsal tunnel. Complications associated with this approach can be significant and periods of non-weight bearing are required. An alternative approach allowing for minimal soft tissue trauma and reduced time to ambulation is therefore desirable. Endoscopic tarsal tunnel decompression may provide such an alternative. The authors performed a systematic review of electronic databases and other relevant sources to identify material regarding the safety of endoscopic tarsal tunnel decompression. Only articles that included clear information concerning the safety of endoscopic tarsal tunnel decompression with a follow-up of at least 12 months were included. Three studies were identified involving 37 feet, with a weighted mean follow-up of 27 months. There were no permanent complications relating to iatrogenic nerve injury, deep infection, or prolonged wound healing problems documented despite initiating ambulation within one week of surgery. Two patients (5.6%) developed recurrence more than 2 years postoperative and one (2.7%) showed no improvement. Endoscopic tarsal tunnel decompression is a safe procedure with a low rate of recurrence or failure and allows for near-immediate ambulation. However, additional prospective investigations comparing open and endoscopic approaches to tarsal tunnel decompression are warranted.

摘要

跗骨管开放手术减压是治疗跗骨管内胫神经受压的标准手术方法。该方法相关的并发症可能较为严重,且需要一段时间的非负重期。因此,需要一种能使软组织创伤最小化并缩短下地行走时间的替代方法。内镜下跗骨管减压术可能提供这样一种选择。作者对电子数据库和其他相关来源进行了系统综述,以确定有关内镜下跗骨管减压术安全性的资料。仅纳入了那些包含内镜下跗骨管减压术安全性明确信息且随访至少12个月的文章。共确定了3项研究,涉及37只足,加权平均随访时间为27个月。尽管在术后1周内就开始行走,但未记录到与医源性神经损伤、深部感染或伤口愈合延迟相关的永久性并发症。2例患者(5.6%)在术后2年以上出现复发,1例(2.7%)无改善。内镜下跗骨管减压术是一种安全的手术,复发率或失败率较低,且允许患者近乎立即行走。然而,有必要进行更多前瞻性研究,比较开放手术和内镜手术治疗跗骨管减压的效果。

相似文献

1
Outcomes and safety of endoscopic tarsal tunnel decompression: a systematic review.内镜下跗骨管减压术的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价
Foot Ankle Spec. 2014 Feb;7(1):57-60. doi: 10.1177/1938640013514267. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
2
Treatment for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.肘部尺神经病变的治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 29;4(4):CD006839. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006839.pub5.
3
Safety and Outcomes of Different Surgical Techniques for Cubital Tunnel Decompression: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.不同肘管减压手术技术的安全性和结局:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2024352. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.24352.
4
Treatment for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.肘部尺神经病变的治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 15;11(11):CD006839. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006839.pub4.
5
Absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for skin closure after carpal tunnel decompression surgery.腕管减压术后皮肤缝合用可吸收缝线与不可吸收缝线的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 1;2(2):CD011757. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011757.pub2.
6
Surgical orbital decompression for thyroid eye disease.甲状腺眼病的眼眶减压手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7(12):CD007630. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007630.pub2.
7
A Small Number of Surgeons Perform the Large Majority of Uncommon Nerve Decompression Procedures.少数外科医生完成了绝大多数不常见的神经减压手术。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2182-2190. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003162. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
8
A systematic review of reviews comparing the effectiveness of endoscopic and open carpal tunnel decompression.一项比较内镜下与开放性腕管减压术有效性的综述的系统评价。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Apr 1;113(4):1184-91. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000110202.08818.c1.
9
Morphological, functional and neurological outcomes of craniectomy versus cranial vault remodeling for isolated nonsyndromic synostosis of the sagittal suture: a systematic review.颅骨切除术与颅骨重塑术治疗孤立性非综合征性矢状缝早闭的形态学、功能及神经学预后:一项系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Sep;13(9):309-68. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2470.
10
Surgical options for lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症的手术治疗选择
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 1;11(11):CD012421. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012421.

引用本文的文献

1
Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome - A Comprehensive Review.跗管综合征——全面综述
Iowa Orthop J. 2024;44(2):32-36.
2
Previously Unreported Case of Variant Posterior Tibial Vein Forming a Loop Adjacent to the Posterior Tibial Artery.胫后静脉变异形成与胫后动脉相邻的袢的既往未报道病例。
Cureus. 2022 Feb 15;14(2):e22248. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22248. eCollection 2022 Feb.
3
An MRI study of the tibial nerve in the ankle canal and its branches: a method of multiplanar reformation with 3D-FIESTA-C sequences.踝关节管内胫神经及其分支的 MRI 研究:一种应用 3D-FIESTA-C 序列进行多平面重建的方法。
BMC Med Imaging. 2021 Mar 17;21(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12880-021-00582-8.
4
Results of ultrasound-guided release of tarsal tunnel syndrome: a review of 81 cases with a minimum follow-up of 18 months.超声引导下跗管综合征松解术的疗效:81 例患者的随访至少 18 个月的回顾性研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Jan 28;15(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-1559-1.
5
Tarsal tunnel syndrome: still more opinions than evidence. Status of the art.跗管综合征:仍有更多的观点而非证据。现状分析。
Neurol Sci. 2017 Oct;38(10):1735-1739. doi: 10.1007/s10072-017-3039-x. Epub 2017 Jun 29.