Department of Biology, College of Staten Island, 2800 Victory Blvd., Staten Island, NY 10314, USA; The Graduate Center, City University of New York, 365 5th Avenue, NY, NY 10016, USA; Department of Biology & Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture, University of Washington, Box 351800, Seattle, WA 98195-1800, USA; Department of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, 2023 G St. NW, Washington, DC 20052, USA; and Department of Herpetology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West and 79th St., New York, NY 10024.
Syst Biol. 2014 Mar;63(2):231-50. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syt099. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
Both gene-tree discordance and unrecognized diversity are sources of error for accurate estimation of species trees, and can affect downstream diversification analyses by obscuring the correct number of nodes, their density, and the lengths of the branches subtending them. Although the theoretical impact of gene-tree discordance on evolutionary analyses has been examined previously, the effect of unsampled and cryptic diversity has not. Here, we examine how delimitation of previously unrecognized diversity in the milksnake (Lampropeltis triangulum) and use of a species-tree approach affects both estimation of the Lampropeltis phylogeny and comparative analyses with respect to the timing of diversification. Coalescent species delimitation indicates that L. triangulum is not monophyletic and that there are multiple species of milksnake, which increases the known species diversity in the genus Lampropeltis by 40%. Both genealogical and temporal discordance occurs between gene trees and the species tree, with evidence that mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) introgression is a main factor. This discordance is further manifested in the preferred models of diversification, where the concatenated gene tree strongly supports an early burst of speciation during the Miocene, in contrast to species-tree estimates where diversification follows a birth-death model and speciation occurs mostly in the Pliocene and Pleistocene. This study highlights the crucial interaction among coalescent-based phylogeography and species delimitation, systematics, and species diversification analyses.
基因树分歧和未被识别的多样性是准确估计物种树的误差源,它们会通过掩盖正确的节点数量、节点密度以及支撑它们的分支长度,影响到下游的多样化分析。虽然之前已经研究了基因树分歧对进化分析的理论影响,但未被采样和隐匿多样性的影响尚未被研究。在这里,我们研究了在奶蛇(Lampropeltis triangulum)中如何划定以前未被识别的多样性,以及使用物种树方法对 Lampropeltis 系统发育的估计和对多样化时间的比较分析的影响。合并物种界定表明,L. triangulum 不是单系的,而且有多种奶蛇,这使 Lampropeltis 属的已知物种多样性增加了 40%。基因树和物种树之间都存在谱系和时间上的分歧,有证据表明线粒体 DNA(mtDNA)的基因渗入是一个主要因素。这种分歧在多样化的首选模型中进一步表现出来,其中,串联基因树强烈支持中新世早期的物种爆发,而物种树估计则表明,多样化遵循出生-死亡模型,并且物种形成主要发生在上新世和更新世。这项研究强调了基于合并的系统地理学和物种界定、系统学以及物种多样化分析之间的关键相互作用。