Toye Christine, Lester Leanne, Popescu Aurora, McInerney Fran, Andrews Sharon, Robinson Andrew L
Curtin University, Australia.
Dementia (London). 2014 Mar 1;13(2):248-56. doi: 10.1177/1471301212471960. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
Care for the person with dementia requires understanding of the person's perspective and preferences, integrated with knowledge of dementia's trajectory and appropriate care. Version One of the Dementia Knowledge Assessment Tool addressed such knowledge in care workers; Version Two is for families as well as staff. Content validity was established during development. Revisions addressed clarity, time for completion, and reliability. When 671 staff completed Version One before an education intervention, internal consistency reliability estimates exceeded 0.70. Validity was supported by higher scores in professional versus nonprofessional staff and following the education. Version Two was used with 34 family carers and 70 staff members. Internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha coefficient) was promising (0.79, both groups). Completion was within 15 minutes. Median correct responses (from 21) were 14 for families (range 4-20) and 16 for the staff (range 3-21). Eighteen staff members (26%) and two family carers (6%) reported substantive dementia education. Inclusion of the person with dementia in care planning is often limited because of a late diagnosis and the progressive impacts of the condition. Establishing a shared staff-family understanding of the dementia trajectory and care strategies likely to be helpful is therefore critical to embarking upon the development and implementation of collaborative long term and end-of-life care plans. Version Two can help establish needs for, and outcomes of, education programs and informational resources in a way that is feasible, minimises burden, and facilitates comparisons across family and staff carer groups.
照顾患有痴呆症的人需要理解其观点和偏好,并结合对痴呆症病程的了解及适当的护理措施。痴呆症知识评估工具第一版针对护理人员的此类知识;第二版则面向家庭和工作人员。在开发过程中确立了内容效度。修订内容涉及清晰度、完成时间和可靠性。在一项教育干预之前,671名工作人员完成了第一版,内部一致性信度估计值超过0.70。专业人员与非专业人员在接受教育后得分更高,这支持了效度。第二版用于34名家庭护理人员和70名工作人员。内部一致性信度(克朗巴哈α系数)很可观(两组均为0.79)。完成时间在15分钟内。(共21题)家庭护理人员的正确回答中位数为14(范围4 - 20),工作人员为16(范围3 - 21)。18名工作人员(26%)和2名家庭护理人员(6%)报告接受过实质性的痴呆症教育。由于诊断较晚以及病情的渐进性影响,将痴呆症患者纳入护理计划往往受到限制。因此,让工作人员和家庭对痴呆症病程以及可能有用的护理策略达成共同理解,对于开展协作性的长期和临终护理计划的制定与实施至关重要。第二版能够以一种可行的方式确定教育项目和信息资源的需求及成果,将负担降至最低,并便于对家庭护理人员和工作人员群体进行比较。