• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在基因-基因相互作用分析中控制假阳性:两种基于条件熵的新方法。

To control false positives in gene-gene interaction analysis: two novel conditional entropy-based approaches.

作者信息

Zuo Xiaoyu, Rao Shaoqi, Fan An, Lin Meihua, Li Haoli, Zhao Xiaolei, Qin Jiheng

机构信息

Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013 Dec 10;8(12):e81984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081984. eCollection 2013.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0081984
PMID:24339984
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3858311/
Abstract

Genome-wide analysis of gene-gene interactions has been recognized as a powerful avenue to identify the missing genetic components that can not be detected by using current single-point association analysis. Recently, several model-free methods (e.g. the commonly used information based metrics and several logistic regression-based metrics) were developed for detecting non-linear dependence between genetic loci, but they are potentially at the risk of inflated false positive error, in particular when the main effects at one or both loci are salient. In this study, we proposed two conditional entropy-based metrics to challenge this limitation. Extensive simulations demonstrated that the two proposed metrics, provided the disease is rare, could maintain consistently correct false positive rate. In the scenarios for a common disease, our proposed metrics achieved better or comparable control of false positive error, compared to four previously proposed model-free metrics. In terms of power, our methods outperformed several competing metrics in a range of common disease models. Furthermore, in real data analyses, both metrics succeeded in detecting interactions and were competitive with the originally reported results or the logistic regression approaches. In conclusion, the proposed conditional entropy-based metrics are promising as alternatives to current model-based approaches for detecting genuine epistatic effects.

摘要

基因-基因相互作用的全基因组分析已被公认为是一种强大的途径,可用于识别那些通过当前单点关联分析无法检测到的缺失遗传成分。最近,人们开发了几种无模型方法(例如常用的基于信息的指标和几种基于逻辑回归的指标)来检测基因座之间的非线性依赖性,但它们存在假阳性错误率虚高的风险,尤其是当一个或两个基因座的主效应显著时。在本研究中,我们提出了两种基于条件熵的指标来应对这一局限性。大量模拟表明,所提出的两种指标在疾病罕见的情况下能够始终保持正确的假阳性率。在常见疾病的情形中,与之前提出的四种无模型指标相比,我们提出的指标在控制假阳性错误方面表现更好或相当。在效能方面,我们的方法在一系列常见疾病模型中优于其他几种竞争指标。此外,在实际数据分析中两种指标都成功检测到了相互作用,并且与最初报道的结果或逻辑回归方法相比具有竞争力。总之,所提出的基于条件熵的指标有望成为当前基于模型的方法的替代方法,用于检测真正的上位性效应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fc5/3858311/9ab49ba8dca2/pone.0081984.g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fc5/3858311/dd191b80d4de/pone.0081984.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fc5/3858311/89aecab7563f/pone.0081984.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fc5/3858311/42d951efeb28/pone.0081984.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fc5/3858311/3ad6ec168980/pone.0081984.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fc5/3858311/8abc9b876589/pone.0081984.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fc5/3858311/0cd5d996fb2c/pone.0081984.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fc5/3858311/5fc0093ddf20/pone.0081984.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fc5/3858311/18a892323eed/pone.0081984.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fc5/3858311/cbf8bcb3c75a/pone.0081984.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fc5/3858311/7e33586beb5b/pone.0081984.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fc5/3858311/f29881b0ab7a/pone.0081984.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fc5/3858311/9ab49ba8dca2/pone.0081984.g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fc5/3858311/dd191b80d4de/pone.0081984.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fc5/3858311/89aecab7563f/pone.0081984.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fc5/3858311/42d951efeb28/pone.0081984.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fc5/3858311/3ad6ec168980/pone.0081984.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fc5/3858311/8abc9b876589/pone.0081984.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fc5/3858311/0cd5d996fb2c/pone.0081984.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fc5/3858311/5fc0093ddf20/pone.0081984.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fc5/3858311/18a892323eed/pone.0081984.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fc5/3858311/cbf8bcb3c75a/pone.0081984.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fc5/3858311/7e33586beb5b/pone.0081984.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fc5/3858311/f29881b0ab7a/pone.0081984.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fc5/3858311/9ab49ba8dca2/pone.0081984.g012.jpg

相似文献

1
To control false positives in gene-gene interaction analysis: two novel conditional entropy-based approaches.在基因-基因相互作用分析中控制假阳性:两种基于条件熵的新方法。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 10;8(12):e81984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081984. eCollection 2013.
2
Comparative analysis of methods for detecting interacting loci.检测互作基因座方法的比较分析。
BMC Genomics. 2011 Jul 5;12:344. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-344.
3
Improved statistics for genome-wide interaction analysis.全基因组互作分析的改进统计学方法。
PLoS Genet. 2012;8(4):e1002625. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002625. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
4
Modified entropy-based procedure detects gene-gene-interactions in unconventional genetic models.基于改进的熵的方法检测非常规遗传模型中的基因-基因相互作用。
BMC Med Genomics. 2020 Apr 23;13(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12920-020-0703-4.
5
An entropy-based approach for testing genetic epistasis underlying complex diseases.一种基于熵的方法,用于检测复杂疾病背后的基因上位性。
J Theor Biol. 2008 Jan 21;250(2):362-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.10.001. Epub 2007 Oct 6.
6
Epistasis and Entropy.上位效应与熵
PLoS Genet. 2016 Dec 22;12(12):e1006322. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006322. eCollection 2016 Dec.
7
A deeper look at two concepts of measuring gene-gene interactions: logistic regression and interaction information revisited.深入探讨测量基因-基因相互作用的两个概念:重新审视逻辑回归和相互作用信息。
Genet Epidemiol. 2018 Mar;42(2):187-200. doi: 10.1002/gepi.22108. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
8
Using Linkage Analysis to Detect Gene-Gene Interactions. 2. Improved Reliability and Extension to More-Complex Models.使用连锁分析检测基因-基因相互作用。2. 提高可靠性并扩展到更复杂的模型。
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 11;11(1):e0146240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146240. eCollection 2016.
9
A modified entropy-based approach for identifying gene-gene interactions in case-control study.基于改进的熵方法的病例对照研究中基因-基因交互作用的识别。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 18;8(7):e69321. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069321. Print 2013.
10
A novel evolution-based method for detecting gene-gene interactions.一种基于进化的新方法用于检测基因-基因相互作用。
PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26435. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026435. Epub 2011 Oct 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimized permutation testing for information theoretic measures of multi-gene interactions.优化排列检验用于多基因相互作用的信息理论测度。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2021 Apr 7;22(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12859-021-04107-6.
2
Modified entropy-based procedure detects gene-gene-interactions in unconventional genetic models.基于改进的熵的方法检测非常规遗传模型中的基因-基因相互作用。
BMC Med Genomics. 2020 Apr 23;13(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12920-020-0703-4.
3
Transferring entropy to the realm of GxG interactions.将熵转移到 GxG 相互作用领域。

本文引用的文献

1
Improved statistics for genome-wide interaction analysis.全基因组互作分析的改进统计学方法。
PLoS Genet. 2012;8(4):e1002625. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002625. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
2
A novel evolution-based method for detecting gene-gene interactions.一种基于进化的新方法用于检测基因-基因相互作用。
PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26435. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026435. Epub 2011 Oct 25.
3
The meaning of interaction.相互作用的含义。
Brief Bioinform. 2018 Jan 1;19(1):136-147. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbw086.
Hum Hered. 2010;70(4):269-77. doi: 10.1159/000321967. Epub 2010 Dec 8.
4
A novel statistic for genome-wide interaction analysis.一种用于全基因组互作分析的新统计量。
PLoS Genet. 2010 Sep 23;6(9):e1001131. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001131.
5
Missing heritability and strategies for finding the underlying causes of complex disease.复杂疾病遗传率缺失及其潜在病因的研究策略。
Nat Rev Genet. 2010 Jun;11(6):446-50. doi: 10.1038/nrg2809.
6
Genome-wide association studies and beyond.全基因组关联研究及其他。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2010;31:9-20 4 p following 20. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103723.
7
Gene--environment-wide association studies: emerging approaches.基因-环境全基因组关联研究:新兴方法。
Nat Rev Genet. 2010 Apr;11(4):259-72. doi: 10.1038/nrg2764.
8
Beyond genome-wide association studies: genetic heterogeneity and individual predisposition to cancer.超越全基因组关联研究:癌症的遗传异质性和个体易感性。
Trends Genet. 2010 Mar;26(3):132-41. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2009.12.008. Epub 2010 Jan 26.
9
Empirical tests for compositional epistasis.组成型上位性的实证检验。
Nat Rev Genet. 2010 Feb;11(2):166. doi: 10.1038/nrg2579-c1.
10
Methods for investigating gene-environment interactions in candidate pathway and genome-wide association studies.候选途径和全基因组关联研究中调查基因-环境相互作用的方法。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2010;31:21-36. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103619.