Suppr超能文献

地塞米松与波生坦对急性肺损伤肺损伤的减轻作用比较:一项实验研究

Comparison of reducing effect on lung injury of dexamethasone and bosentan in acute lung injury: an experimental study.

作者信息

Araz Omer, Demirci Elif, Yilmazel Ucar Elif, Calik Muhammet, Pulur Didem, Karaman Adem, Yayla Muhammed, Altun Eren, Halici Zekai, Akgun Metin

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Ataturk University School of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey.

出版信息

Multidiscip Respir Med. 2013 Dec 17;8(1):74. doi: 10.1186/2049-6958-8-74.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Different medical therapies are employed in acute lung injury (ALI) but there is still a debate about the efficacy of these drugs. Among these therapies steroids are clinically applied and bosentan is experimentally studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of these two drugs to treat inflammation in ALI by histopathological comparison.

METHODS

The five experimental groups (n = 5 per group) were: saline control (Group I); lipopolysaccharide (LPS) + saline (Group II); LPS + dexamethasone (Group III); LPS + 50 mg/kg bosentan (Group IV); and LPS + 100 mg/kg bosentan (Group V). Bosentan was administered orally one hour before and 12 hours after LPS treatment. Dexamethasone was administered intraperitoneally in three doses of 1 mg/kg; one dose was co-administered with LPS and the other two doses were given respectively 30 minutes before and after LPS treatment. Vasodilation-congestion, hemorrhage, polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN) infiltration, mononuclear leukocyte (MNL) infiltration, alveolar wall thickening, alveolar destruction/emphysematous appearance, and focal organization were the parameters used as criteria for evaluating inflammation and efficacy of treatment.

RESULTS

Compared to the LPS-only group (Group II), dexamethasone treatment (Group III) resulted in significant improvements in vasodilation-congestion, hemorrhage, PMN and MNL infiltration, alveolar wall thickening and emphysematous areas. Treatment with 50 mg/kg dose of bosentan (Group IV) also resulted in significant improvements in hemorrhage, PMN and MNL infiltration, alveolar wall thickening and alveolar destruction. Reducing lung injury and reparative effects of 100 mg/kg bosentan were significant in all parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Bosentan is as effective as dexamethasone for treating lung injury in ALI. Bosentan at 100 mg/kg can be recommended as a first treatment choice based on its significant reducing lung injury and reparative effects.

摘要

背景

急性肺损伤(ALI)采用了不同的药物治疗方法,但这些药物的疗效仍存在争议。在这些治疗方法中,类固醇在临床上应用,波生坦则在实验中进行研究。本研究的目的是通过组织病理学比较来评估这两种药物治疗ALI炎症的疗效。

方法

五个实验组(每组n = 5)分别为:生理盐水对照组(I组);脂多糖(LPS)+生理盐水组(II组);LPS +地塞米松组(III组);LPS + 50 mg/kg波生坦组(IV组);LPS + 100 mg/kg波生坦组(V组)。波生坦在LPS治疗前1小时和治疗后12小时口服给药。地塞米松分三次腹腔注射,剂量为1 mg/kg;一次剂量与LPS同时给药,另外两次剂量分别在LPS治疗前30分钟和治疗后30分钟给药。血管扩张充血、出血、多形核白细胞(PMN)浸润、单核白细胞(MNL)浸润、肺泡壁增厚、肺泡破坏/气肿外观和局灶性机化是用于评估炎症和治疗效果的参数标准。

结果

与仅用LPS组(II组)相比,地塞米松治疗组(III组)在血管扩张充血、出血、PMN和MNL浸润、肺泡壁增厚和气肿区域方面有显著改善。50 mg/kg剂量的波生坦治疗组(IV组)在出血、PMN和MNL浸润、肺泡壁增厚和肺泡破坏方面也有显著改善。100 mg/kg波生坦减轻肺损伤和修复作用在所有参数方面均显著。

结论

波生坦在治疗ALI肺损伤方面与地塞米松同样有效。基于其显著的减轻肺损伤和修复作用,100 mg/kg的波生坦可被推荐作为首选治疗药物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c238/3891975/723e6828b078/2049-6958-8-74-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验