University of Wisconsin.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 May;26(5):1039-48. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00544. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
Humans show consistent differences in the extent to which their behavior reflects a bias toward appetitive approach-related behavior or avoidance of aversive stimuli [Elliot, A. J. Approach and avoidance motivation. In A. J. Elliot (Ed.), Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation (pp. 3-14). New York: Psychology Press, 2008]. We examined the hypothesis that in healthy participants this motivational bias (assessed by self-report and by a probabilistic learning task that allows direct comparison of the relative sensitivity to reward and punishment) reflects lateralization of dopamine signaling. Using [F-18]fallypride to measure D2/D3 binding, we found that self-reported motivational bias was predicted by the asymmetry of frontal D2 binding. Similarly, striatal and frontal asymmetries in D2 dopamine receptor binding, rather than absolute binding levels, predicted individual differences in learning from reward versus punishment. These results suggest that normal variation in asymmetry of dopamine signaling may, in part, underlie human personality and cognition.
人类在行为反映出对趋近相关行为的偏好或回避厌恶刺激的程度上表现出一致的差异[埃利奥特,A. J. 趋近和回避动机。在 A. J. 埃利奥特(编辑),趋近和回避动机手册(第 3-14 页)。纽约:心理学出版社,2008]。我们检验了这样一个假设,即在健康参与者中,这种动机偏差(通过自我报告和概率学习任务来评估,该任务允许直接比较对奖励和惩罚的相对敏感性)反映了多巴胺信号的侧化。使用 [F-18]fallypride 来测量 D2/D3 结合,我们发现自我报告的动机偏差与额叶 D2 结合的不对称性有关。同样,纹状体和额叶多巴胺 D2 受体结合的不对称性,而不是绝对结合水平,预测了从奖励到惩罚的学习中的个体差异。这些结果表明,正常的多巴胺信号不对称变化可能部分解释了人类的个性和认知。