潜藏为一种积极参与过程：对参与在线癌症支持小组的纵向调查。
Lurking as an active participation process: a longitudinal investigation of engagement with an online cancer support group.
作者信息
Han Jeong Yeob, Hou Jiran, Kim Eunkyung, Gustafson David H
机构信息
a Department of Telecommunications , University of Georgia.
出版信息
Health Commun. 2014;29(9):911-23. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2013.816911. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
Abstract
To better understand participation in computer-mediated social support (CMSS) groups for breast cancer patients, this study examines two overarching questions of (1) who are posters, lurkers, or nonusers and (2) what role do these different types of engagement play in explaining psychosocial health outcomes? This study incorporates the comprehensive model of information seeking and two competing models of social enhancement and social compensation, as well as the literature on lurking and posting behaviors in online groups to answer research questions. Our findings suggest that patterns of engagement in a CMSS group differed according to patients' sociodemographic characteristics and psychosocial factors. In addition, we found that lurkers had a higher level of perceived functional well-being than posters at 3 months post baseline. Theoretical and practical implications for effective online cancer support group campaigns are discussed.
摘要
为了更好地理解乳腺癌患者参与计算机介导的社会支持（CMSS）群组的情况，本研究探讨了两个总体问题：（1）谁是发帖者、潜水者或非使用者；（2）这些不同类型的参与在解释心理社会健康结果方面发挥着什么作用？本研究纳入了信息寻求综合模型以及社会增强和社会补偿这两种相互竞争的模型，还有关于在线群组中潜水和发帖行为的文献，以回答研究问题。我们的研究结果表明，CMSS群组中的参与模式因患者的社会人口学特征和心理社会因素而异。此外,我们发现，在基线后3个月时，潜水者的感知功能幸福感水平高于发帖者。本文还讨论了有效开展在线癌症支持群组活动的理论和实践意义。
相似文献
1
Lurking as an active participation process: a longitudinal investigation of engagement with an online cancer support group.潜藏为一种积极参与过程：对参与在线癌症支持小组的纵向调查。
Health Commun. 2014;29(9):911-23. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2013.816911. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
2
Social and psychological determinants of levels of engagement with an online breast cancer support group: posters, lurkers, and nonusers.社会和心理因素对参与在线乳腺癌支持小组的程度的影响：发帖者、潜水者和非使用者。
J Health Commun. 2012;17(3):356-71. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2011.585696. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
3
Benefits of peer support in online Japanese breast cancer communities: differences between lurkers and posters.日本乳腺癌在线社区中同伴支持的益处：潜水者与发帖者之间的差异。
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec 29;13(4):e122. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1696.
4
Self-reported differences in empowerment between lurkers and posters in online patient support groups.在线患者支持小组中潜水者和发帖者自我报告的赋权差异。
J Med Internet Res. 2008 Jun 30;10(2):e18. doi: 10.2196/jmir.992.
5
Opinion Leaders in Online Cancer Support Groups: An Investigation of Their Antecedents and Consequences.在线癌症支持小组中的意见领袖：对其影响因素及结果的调查
Health Commun. 2017 Feb;32(2):142-151. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2015.1110005. Epub 2016 May 18.
6
The process and effect of supportive message expression and reception in online breast cancer support groups.在线乳腺癌支持小组中支持性信息表达和接收的过程和效果。
Psychooncology. 2012 May;21(5):531-40. doi: 10.1002/pon.1942. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
7
The role of the family environment and computer-mediated social support on breast cancer patients' coping strategies.家庭环境和计算机中介社会支持对乳腺癌患者应对策略的作用。
J Health Commun. 2014 Sep;19(9):981-98. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2013.864723. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
8
Emotional approach coping and the effects of online peer-led support group participation among patients with breast cancer: a longitudinal study.情感应对方式以及在线同伴主导的支持小组参与对乳腺癌患者的影响：一项纵向研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Nov 28;16(11):e256. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3517.
9
Patterns of Engagement With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Online Support Groups: Comparing Posters and Lurkers.炎症性肠病在线支持小组的参与模式：比较发帖者和潜水者。
Gastroenterol Nurs. 2015 Sep-Oct;38(5):348-53. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0000000000000131.
10
Predictors of the change in the expression of emotional support within an online breast cancer support group: a longitudinal study.在线乳腺癌支持群组中情绪支持表达变化的预测因素：一项纵向研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Jan;90(1):88-95. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.10.001. Epub 2012 Oct 31.
引用本文的文献
1
Feasibility and Usability of a Web-Based Peer Support Network for Care Partners of People With Serious Illness (ConnectShareCare): Observational Study.针对重症患者护理伙伴的基于网络的同伴支持网络（ConnectShareCare）的可行性和可用性：观察性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jun 11;9:e70206. doi: 10.2196/70206.
2
A mixed studies systematic review on the health and wellbeing effects, and underlying mechanisms, of online support groups for chronic conditions.一项关于慢性病在线支持小组对健康和幸福的影响及潜在机制的混合研究系统评价。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Mar 15;3(1):40. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00217-6.
3
Facebook Groups for Multiracial People: A Latent Profile Analysis Reveals Unique User Subtypes and Links with Depressive Symptoms.多族裔人群的脸书群组：潜在剖面分析揭示独特的用户亚型及与抑郁症状的关联。
Affect Sci. 2024 Sep 5;5(4):468-476. doi: 10.1007/s42761-024-00268-8. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Use and impact of virtual resources for peer support by young adults living with cancer: A systematic review.虚拟资源在癌症青年患者同伴支持中的应用与影响：一项系统综述。
Can Oncol Nurs J. 2024 Jul 1;34(3):381-403. doi: 10.5737/23688076343381. eCollection 2024 Summer.
5
A Web-Based Peer Support Network to Help Care Partners of People With Serious Illness: Co-Design Study.基于网络的同伴支持网络，帮助照顾重病患者的人：共同设计研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 May 8;11:e53194. doi: 10.2196/53194.
6
Head and Neck Cancer Online Support Groups: Disparities in Participation and Impact on Patients.头颈癌在线支持小组：参与情况的差异及其对患者的影响
OTO Open. 2023 Nov 5;7(4):e87. doi: 10.1002/oto2.87. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec.
7
A comparison of the sociodemographic, medical, and psychosocial characteristics of adolescents and young adults diagnosed with cancer recruited in-person and online: A Canadian cross-sectional survey.一项针对通过线下和线上招募的癌症确诊青少年及青年的社会人口学、医学和心理社会特征的比较：一项加拿大横断面调查。
Digit Health. 2023 Oct 25;9:20552076231205278. doi: 10.1177/20552076231205278. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
8
Leveraging digital technology for social connectedness among adults with chronic conditions: A systematic review.利用数字技术促进慢性病成年人的社交联系：一项系统综述。
Digit Health. 2023 Oct 3;9:20552076231204746. doi: 10.1177/20552076231204746. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
9
The role of emergency physicians in the fight against health misinformation: Implications for resident training.急诊医生在对抗健康错误信息中的作用：对住院医师培训的启示。
AEM Educ Train. 2023 Jun 27;7(Suppl 1):S48-S57. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10877. eCollection 2023 Jun.
10
Delivering a Postpartum Weight Loss Intervention via Facebook or In-Person Groups: Results From a Randomized Pilot Feasibility Trial.通过 Facebook 或线下小组提供产后减肥干预：一项随机试点可行性试验的结果。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Apr 27;11:e41545. doi: 10.2196/41545.
本文引用的文献
1
How Does Insightful and Emotional Disclosure Bring Potential Health Benefits?: Study Based on Online Support Groups for Women with Breast Cancer.深刻且情感性的披露如何带来潜在的健康益处？：基于乳腺癌女性在线支持小组的研究
J Commun. 2011 Jun;61(3):432-464. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01555.x.
2
Unraveling Uses and Effects of an Interactive Health Communication System.解析交互式健康通信系统的用途与效果
J Broadcast Electron Media. 2009;53(1):112-133. doi: 10.1080/08838150802643787. Epub 2009 Mar 12.
3
Integrating eHealth With Human Services for Breast Cancer Patients.将电子健康与乳腺癌患者的人文关怀服务相结合。
Transl Behav Med. 2011 Mar;1(1):146-154. doi: 10.1007/s13142-011-0027-1.
4
Benefits of peer support in online Japanese breast cancer communities: differences between lurkers and posters.日本乳腺癌在线社区中同伴支持的益处：潜水者与发帖者之间的差异。
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec 29;13(4):e122. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1696.
5
Social and psychological determinants of levels of engagement with an online breast cancer support group: posters, lurkers, and nonusers.社会和心理因素对参与在线乳腺癌支持小组的程度的影响：发帖者、潜水者和非使用者。
J Health Commun. 2012;17(3):356-71. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2011.585696. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
6
A longitudinal study of use of an interactive health communication system.一项关于交互式健康传播系统使用的纵向研究。
Health Commun. 2012;27(4):319-30. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2011.578334. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
7
Optimizing eHealth breast cancer interventions: which types of eHealth services are effective?优化电子健康乳腺癌干预措施：哪些类型的电子健康服务有效？
Transl Behav Med. 2011 Mar;1(1):134-145. doi: 10.1007/s13142-010-0004-0.
8
Empathic exchanges in online cancer support groups: distinguishing message expression and reception effects.在线癌症支持小组中的同理心交流：区分信息表达和接收效果。
Health Commun. 2011 Mar;26(2):185-97. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2010.544283.
9
Mediating processes of two communication interventions for breast cancer patients.两种针对乳腺癌患者的沟通干预措施的中介过程。
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Dec;81 Suppl(Suppl):S48-53. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.10.021.
10
Differences in information seeking among breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer patients: results from a population-based survey.乳腺癌、前列腺癌和结直肠癌患者信息寻求行为的差异：基于人群的调查结果。
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Dec;81 Suppl:S54-62. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.09.010. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
Zotero 插件