Setoyama Yoko, Yamazaki Yoshihiko, Namayama Kazuhiro
Department of Nursing Informatics, St Luke's College of Nursing, Tokyo, Japan.
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec 29;13(4):e122. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1696.
Web 2.0 has improved interactions among peers on the Internet, especially for the many online patient communities that have emerged over the past decades. Online communities are said to be particularly beneficial peer support resources for patients with breast cancer. However, most studies of online patient communities have focused on those members who post actively (posters), even though there are many members who participate without posting (lurkers). In addition, little attention has been paid to the usage of online communities among non-English-speaking patients.
The present study explored the differences in peer support received by lurkers and posters in online breast cancer communities. It also examined the effects of such support on both groups' mental health.
We conducted an exploratory, descriptive, cross-sectional, Web-based survey among members of four Japanese online breast cancer communities. In an online questionnaire, we asked questions regarding sociodemographics, disease-related characteristics, mental health, participation in online communities, and peer support received from those communities.
Of the 465 people who accessed the questionnaire, 253 completed it. Of the respondents, 113/220 (51.4%) were lurkers. There was no significant difference between lurkers and posters with regard to sociodemographic variables. About half of the posters had been given a diagnosis of breast cancer less than a year previously, which was a significantly shorter period than that of the lurkers (P = .02). The 5 support functions extracted by factor analysis were the same for both posters and lurkers. These were emotional support/helper therapy, emotional expression, conflict, advice, and insight/universality. When the support scores were calculated, insight/universality scored highest for both posters and lurkers, with scores that were not significantly different between the two groups. Among the 5 support scores, emotional support/helper therapy and emotional expression were significantly higher among posters. For posters, emotional support/helper therapy and advice were negatively correlated with the anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Emotional expression, advice, and insight/universality were negatively correlated with the anxiety subscale for lurkers.
We found that posters felt they received more benefits from online communities than lurkers did, including emotional support, helping other patients, and expressing their emotions. Yet even lurkers were found to gain a certain amount of peer support through online communities, especially with regard to advice and insight/universality. The results demonstrate that participation in online communities--even as a lurker--may be beneficial to breast cancer patients' mental health.
Web 2.0改善了互联网上用户之间的互动,尤其是在过去几十年中涌现出的众多在线患者社区。据说在线社区对于乳腺癌患者而言是特别有益的同伴支持资源。然而,大多数关于在线患者社区的研究都集中在那些积极发帖的成员(发帖者)身上,尽管有许多成员不发帖却参与其中(潜水者)。此外,非英语患者对在线社区的使用情况很少受到关注。
本研究探讨了在线乳腺癌社区中潜水者和发帖者获得的同伴支持的差异。它还考察了这种支持对两组心理健康的影响。
我们对四个日本在线乳腺癌社区的成员进行了一项基于网络的探索性、描述性、横断面调查。在一份在线问卷中,我们询问了有关社会人口统计学、疾病相关特征、心理健康、参与在线社区以及从这些社区获得的同伴支持等问题。
在465名访问问卷的人中,253人完成了问卷。在受访者中,113/220(51.4%)是潜水者。在社会人口统计学变量方面潜水者和发帖者之间没有显著差异。大约一半的发帖者在不到一年前被诊断出患有乳腺癌,这一时期明显短于潜水者(P = 0.02)。通过因子分析提取的5种支持功能对于发帖者和潜水者来说是相同的。这些功能是情感支持/辅助治疗、情感表达、冲突、建议以及洞察/普遍性。当计算支持得分时,洞察/普遍性在发帖者和潜水者中得分最高,两组之间的得分没有显著差异。在5种支持得分中,情感支持/辅助治疗和情感表达在发帖者中显著更高。对于发帖者来说,情感支持/辅助治疗和建议与医院焦虑抑郁量表的焦虑分量表呈负相关。情感表达、建议和洞察/普遍性与潜水者的焦虑分量表呈负相关。
我们发现发帖者觉得他们比潜水者从在线社区中获得了更多益处,包括情感支持、帮助其他患者以及表达自己的情感。然而,即使是潜水者也被发现通过在线社区获得了一定程度的同伴支持,尤其是在建议和洞察/普遍性方面。结果表明,参与在线社区——即使作为潜水者——可能对乳腺癌患者的心理健康有益。