• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国重新认证的经验及未来计划。

The United Kingdom's experience with and future plans for revalidation.

作者信息

Archer Julian, de Bere Sam Regan

机构信息

NIHR Career Development Fellow, Clinical Senior Lecturer and Director of the Collaboration for the Advancement of Medical Education Research & Assessment (CAMERA), Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine & Dentistry.

出版信息

J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2013 Fall;33 Suppl 1:S48-53. doi: 10.1002/chp.21206.

DOI:10.1002/chp.21206
PMID:24347152
Abstract

Assuring fitness to practice for doctors internationally is increasingly complex. In the United Kingdom, the General Medical Council (GMC) has recently launched revalidation, which has been designed to bring all doctors into a governed environment. Since December 2012, all doctors who wish to practice are required to submit and reflect on supporting documentation against a framework of best practice, Good Medical Practice. These documents are brought together in an annual appraisal. Evidence of practice includes clinical governance activities such as significant events, complaints and audits, continuing professional development and feedback from colleagues and patients. Revalidation has been designed to support professionalism and identify early doctors in difficulty to support their remediation and so assure patient safety. The appraiser decides annually if the doctor has met the standard which is shared with the most senior doctor in the area, the responsible officer (RO). The RO's role is to make a recommendation for revalidation every 5 years for each doctor to the GMC. Revalidation is unique in that it is national, compulsory, involves all doctors regardless of position or training, and is linked to the potentially performance moderating process of appraisal. However, it has a long and troubled history that is shaped by high-profile medical scandals and delays from the profession, the GMC, and the government. Revalidation has been complicated further by rhetoric around patient care and driving up standards but at the same time identifying poor performance. The GMC have responded by commissioning a national evaluation which is currently under development.

摘要

确保国际医生具备行医资格正变得越来越复杂。在英国,英国医学总会(GMC)最近启动了重新认证程序,其目的是将所有医生纳入一个受监管的环境。自2012年12月起,所有希望行医的医生都必须根据最佳实践框架《良好医疗规范》提交并反思支持性文件。这些文件在年度评估中汇总。行医证据包括临床治理活动,如重大事件、投诉和审计、持续专业发展以及同事和患者的反馈。重新认证旨在支持专业精神,并尽早识别有困难的医生,以支持他们的补救措施,从而确保患者安全。评估人员每年决定医生是否达到标准,该标准会与该地区的最高级医生即责任官员(RO)共享。RO的职责是每5年向GMC为每位医生提出重新认证的建议。重新认证的独特之处在于它是全国性的、强制性的,涉及所有医生,无论其职位或培训情况如何,并且与可能的绩效评估过程相关联。然而,它有着漫长且麻烦的历史,受到备受瞩目的医疗丑闻以及来自行业、GMC和政府的拖延的影响。围绕患者护理和提高标准但同时识别不良表现的言辞进一步使重新认证变得复杂。GMC已通过委托进行一项目前正在开展的全国性评估来做出回应。

相似文献

1
The United Kingdom's experience with and future plans for revalidation.英国重新认证的经验及未来计划。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2013 Fall;33 Suppl 1:S48-53. doi: 10.1002/chp.21206.
2
Paper trials: a qualitative study exploring the place of portfolios in making revalidation recommendations for Responsible Officers.纸质试验:一项定性研究,探讨档案袋在为责任官员提出再认证建议中的作用。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Feb 17;16:66. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0592-6.
3
Revalidation is not to be feared and can be achieved by continuous objective assessment.再认证并不可怕,通过持续的客观评估即可实现。
Med J Aust. 2015 Aug 3;203(3):142-4, 144e.1. doi: 10.5694/mja14.00081.
4
Commentary: the role of appraisal and multisource feedback in the UK General Medical Council's new revalidation system.述评:在英国医学总会新的再认证体系中,评价和多源反馈的作用。
Acad Med. 2012 Dec;87(12):1654-6. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182758c02.
5
"No one has yet properly articulated what we are trying to achieve": a discourse analysis of interviews with revalidation policy leaders in the United Kingdom.“没有人能够准确地阐明我们试图实现的目标”:对英国再认证政策领导人的访谈进行话语分析。
Acad Med. 2015 Jan;90(1):88-93. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000464.
6
Standards and revalidation or recertification.标准与再验证或重新认证。
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2004 Nov;33(6):715-9.
7
Recertification and continuing professional development: The way ahead.再认证和持续专业发展:未来之路。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2010 Dec;24(6):807-18. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2010.04.004. Epub 2010 Aug 4.
8
Revalidation - a personal reflection.重新验证——个人反思
Aust Fam Physician. 2013 Nov;42(11):826-8.
9
Pilot Medical Certification飞行员医学认证
10
Revalidation: implications for Australian anaesthetists.重新认证:对澳大利亚麻醉医生的影响
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2015 Sep;43(5):652-61. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1504300516.

引用本文的文献

1
Meta: A meta-analysis and psychometric evaluation of the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI) in the context of health professions education.元分析:健康职业教育背景下元认知意识量表(MAI)的元分析及心理测量学评估
Anat Sci Educ. 2025 Aug;18(8):786-801. doi: 10.1002/ase.70085. Epub 2025 Jul 4.
2
Exploring whether (and how) self-reflection can improve practice as a teacher educator.探究自我反思是否(以及如何)能够提升教师教育者的实践能力。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2018 Mar 23;7:67. doi: 10.15694/mep.2018.0000067.1. eCollection 2018.
3
Brave Clarice-healthcare serial killers, patterns, motives, and solutions.
勇敢的克拉丽斯——医疗保健领域的连环杀手、模式、动机与解决方案。
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2023 Sep;19(3):452-463. doi: 10.1007/s12024-022-00556-4. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
4
Doctors' attitudes to, beliefs about, and experiences of the regulation of professional competence: a scoping review protocol.医生对专业能力监管的态度、信念和经验:范围综述方案。
Syst Rev. 2019 Aug 22;8(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1132-3.
5
Policing the profession? Regulatory reform, restratification and the emergence of Responsible Officers as a new locus of power in UK medicine.监管行业?监管改革、再分层以及责任官员的出现——英国医学领域的新权力中心
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Sep;213:98-105. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.042. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
6
The Evolving Purposes of Medical Revalidation in the United Kingdom: A Qualitative Study of Professional and Regulatory Narratives.英国医学再认证目的的演变:专业和监管叙事的定性研究。
Acad Med. 2018 Apr;93(4):642-647. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001993.
7
What are the implications of implementation science for medical education?实施科学对医学教育有哪些影响?
Med Educ Online. 2015 Apr 23;20:27003. doi: 10.3402/meo.v20.27003. eCollection 2015.