Suppr超能文献

重症监护培训模式。欧洲视角。

Models for intensive care training. A European perspective.

机构信息

1 Intensive Care Medicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; and.

出版信息

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Feb 1;189(3):256-62. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201311-2058CP.

Abstract

The diversity of European culture is reflected in its healthcare training programs. In intensive care medicine (ICM), the differences in national training programs were so marked that it was unlikely that they could produce specialists of equivalent skills. The Competency-Based Training in Intensive Care Medicine in Europe (CoBaTrICE) program was established in 2003 as a Europe-based worldwide collaboration of national training organizations to create core competencies for ICM using consensus methodologies to establish common ground. The group's professional and research ethos created a social identity that facilitated change. The program was easily adaptable to different training structures and incorporated the voice of patients and relatives. The CoBaTrICE program has now been adopted by 15 European countries, with another 12 countries planning to adopt the training program, and is currently available in nine languages, including English. ICM is now recognized as a primary specialty in Spain, Switzerland, and the UK. There are still wide variations in structures and processes of training in ICM across Europe, although there has been agreement on a set of common program standards. The combination of a common "product specification" for an intensivist, combined with persisting variation in the educational context in which competencies are delivered, provides a rich source of research inquiry. Pedagogic research in ICM could usefully focus on the interplay between educational interventions, healthcare systems and delivery, and patient outcomes, such as including whether competency-based program are associated with lower error rates, whether communication skills training is associated with greater patient and family satisfaction, how multisource feedback might best be used to improve reflective learning and teamworking, or whether increasing the proportion of specialists trained in acute care in the hospital at weekends results in better patient outcomes.

摘要

欧洲文化的多样性反映在其医疗培训计划中。在重症监护医学(ICM)中,各国培训计划的差异如此之大,以至于不太可能培养出技能相当的专家。基于能力的欧洲重症监护医学培训(CoBaTrICE)计划于 2003 年成立,作为一个基于欧洲的全球性合作,由国家培训组织组成,使用共识方法为 ICM 创建核心能力,以建立共同基础。该组织的专业和研究精神创造了一种社会认同,促进了变革。该计划很容易适应不同的培训结构,并纳入了患者和家属的声音。CoBaTrICE 计划现已被 15 个欧洲国家采用,另有 12 个国家计划采用该培训计划,目前该计划有 9 种语言版本,包括英语。ICM 现在被认为是西班牙、瑞士和英国的主要专业。尽管已经就一套共同的计划标准达成一致,但欧洲各地的 ICM 培训结构和过程仍存在很大差异。共同的“强化治疗师产品规格”与在提供能力的教育背景中持续存在的差异相结合,为研究提供了丰富的来源。ICM 的教学研究可以集中在教育干预、医疗保健系统和服务以及患者结果之间的相互作用上,例如包括基于能力的计划是否与较低的错误率相关,沟通技巧培训是否与患者和家庭满意度提高相关,多源反馈如何最好地用于提高反思性学习和团队合作,或者增加周末在医院接受急性护理培训的专家比例是否会改善患者结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验