Yepes Eliana, Quintero Paula, Rueda Zulma Vanessa, Pedroza Andrea
Department of Orthodontics, Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Envigado, Colombia
Department of Orthodontics, Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Envigado, Colombia.
Eur J Orthod. 2014 Oct;36(5):586-94. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjt091. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
The facemask is used to treat early class III malocclusion, in combination with expansion therapy. There is a great deal of controversy in literature regarding the effectiveness of protraction facemask treatment as studies report results anywhere from considerable changes to lack of any maxillary improvement. This controversy may be due to the fact that the process of placing the orthopaedic facemask on patients has, in part, been done empirically, without the use of literature containing the clinical parameters for facemask placement for maxillary protraction.
To determine the optimal magnitude, duration, and direction that should be used in maxillary protraction facemask therapy.
A systematic search was carried out in the following databases: Medline, Google Scholar, Embase, Cochrane, Lilacs, Scielo, with no restriction placed on the year of publication, in English and Spanish, using MeSH terms and free-text terms.
Clinical trials, systematic reviews, meta-analysis, cohort studies, case-control studies, and cross-sectional studies were included, whereas literature reviews, case reports, case series, symposiums, compendiums, pilot studies, and expert opinions were excluded.
Data selection and extraction were blinded and performed independently, and the methodology was evaluated using various scales.
A total of 223 articles were found. After eliminating repeated articles and those that did not meet the selection criteria, 14 remained for analysis. Regarding magnitude, there were values ranging from 180 to 800g per side; there were force vector direction values between 20 and 30 degrees below the occlusal plane or parallel to the occlusal plane; and a duration ranging from 10 to 24 hours of use per day.
There is no scientific evidence that would allow for the definition of adequate parameters for force magnitude, direction, and duration for maxillary protraction facemask treatment in class III patients.
面罩用于联合扩弓治疗早期III类错牙合畸形。关于上颌前牵引面罩治疗的有效性,文献中存在大量争议,因为研究报告的结果差异很大,从有显著变化到上颌无任何改善。这种争议可能是由于在给患者佩戴矫形面罩的过程部分是凭经验进行的,没有参考包含上颌前牵引面罩放置临床参数的文献。
确定在上颌前牵引面罩治疗中应使用的最佳力值、持续时间和方向。
在以下数据库中进行了系统检索:Medline、谷歌学术、Embase、Cochrane、Lilacs、Scielo,对出版年份无限制,使用医学主题词和自由文本词,检索语言为英语和西班牙语。
纳入临床试验、系统评价、荟萃分析、队列研究、病例对照研究和横断面研究,排除文献综述、病例报告、病例系列、研讨会、汇编、试点研究和专家意见。
数据选择和提取采用盲法且独立进行,使用各种量表评估方法。
共找到223篇文章。在剔除重复文章和不符合入选标准的文章后,剩余14篇进行分析。关于力值,每侧范围为180至800克;力向量方向值在咬合平面以下20至3...