• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直肠出血诊疗流程能够成功减少急诊入院人数。

A rectal bleeding algorithm can successfully reduce emergency admissions.

作者信息

Patel R, Clancy R, Crowther E, Vannahme M, Pullyblank A

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Frenchay Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2014 May;16(5):377-81. doi: 10.1111/codi.12524.

DOI:10.1111/codi.12524
PMID:24354580
Abstract

AIM

Acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) is a common cause of emergency admissions yet rarely requires blood transfusion or radiological/surgical intervention. We aimed to develop a risk assessment tool to identify patients with acute LGIB who can be safely managed in primary care.

METHOD

We retrospectively applied an existing nomogram to 20 admissions to obtain criteria that could predict the need for transfusion. We simplified the algorithm to three criteria and developed an associated care pathway. If haemoglobin was > 13 g/dl, systolic blood pressure > 115 mmHg and the patient was not anticoagulated, admission could be avoided. These criteria were then applied to 57 prospective patients attending during a 16-week period. This was implemented with education of primary and secondary care staff, access to an emergency clinic and provision of patient information.

RESULTS

We applied our algorithm and care pathway to 57 patients with uncomplicated rectal bleeding. Thirty-five per cent (20/57) of potential admissions were avoided. Instead, patients received written information and underwent flexible sigmoidoscopy as outpatients within 6 weeks. One discharged patient was readmitted from endoscopy with severe colitis. There were no other readmissions or complications. Of the 36 patients for whom the algorithm predicted admission was needed, 33% (12/36) were anticoagulated, 94% (34/36) had haemoglobin < 13 g/dl and 42% (15/36) had a systolic blood pressure < 115 mmHg. Only one admission (1.8%) did not fulfil the admission criteria and could have potentially been avoided. Avoidable admissions reduced from 50 to 1.8%.

CONCLUSION

The application of a simple rectal bleeding algorithm can safely prevent unnecessary admissions.

摘要

目的

急性下消化道出血(LGIB)是急诊入院的常见原因,但很少需要输血或进行放射学/外科干预。我们旨在开发一种风险评估工具,以识别可在基层医疗中安全管理的急性LGIB患者。

方法

我们对20例入院病例回顾性应用现有的列线图,以获得可预测输血需求的标准。我们将该算法简化为三个标准,并制定了相关的护理路径。如果血红蛋白>13g/dl、收缩压>115mmHg且患者未接受抗凝治疗,则可避免入院。然后将这些标准应用于16周内就诊的57例前瞻性患者。这一过程通过对基层和二级医疗人员的培训、设立急诊诊所及提供患者信息来实施。

结果

我们将算法和护理路径应用于57例单纯直肠出血患者。35%(20/57)的潜在入院得以避免。相反,患者收到书面信息,并在6周内作为门诊患者接受了乙状结肠镜检查。一名出院患者在内镜检查后因严重结肠炎再次入院。没有其他再次入院或并发症发生。在算法预测需要入院的36例患者中,33%(12/36)接受了抗凝治疗,94%(34/36)的血红蛋白<13g/dl,42%(15/36)的收缩压<115mmHg。只有一例入院(1.8%)不符合入院标准,本可避免。可避免的入院率从50%降至1.8%。

结论

应用简单的直肠出血算法可安全地避免不必要的入院。

相似文献

1
A rectal bleeding algorithm can successfully reduce emergency admissions.直肠出血诊疗流程能够成功减少急诊入院人数。
Colorectal Dis. 2014 May;16(5):377-81. doi: 10.1111/codi.12524.
2
Unplanned admission to intensive care after emergency hospitalisation: risk factors and development of a nomogram for individualising risk.急诊住院后意外入住重症监护病房:风险因素及个体化风险列线图的制定
Resuscitation. 2009 Feb;80(2):224-30. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2008.10.030. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
3
[Poor outcome factors associated to patients with lower digestive bleeding in a public hospital].[公立医院下消化道出血患者的不良预后因素]
Rev Gastroenterol Peru. 2016 Oct-Dec;36(4):298-303.
4
Risk scoring systems to predict need for clinical intervention for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding.预测非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者临床干预需求的风险评分系统。
Am J Emerg Med. 2007 Sep;25(7):774-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.12.024.
5
The SHAPE score: a new score for lower gastrointestinal bleeding that predicts low-risk of hospital-based intervention.SHAPE评分:一种用于下消化道出血的新评分,可预测基于医院干预的低风险。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018 Dec;53(12):1484-1489. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1532019. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
6
Single center assessment of the role of Oakland score among patients admitted for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding.单中心评估 Oakland 评分在急性下消化道出血患者入院中的作用。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Jul 15;24(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03283-y.
7
The management of low-risk primary upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in the community: a 5-year observational study.社区低危原发性上消化道出血的管理:一项为期 5 年的观察性研究。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Mar;24(3):288-93. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32834febef.
8
The impact of a new emergency admission avoidance system for older people on length of stay and same-day discharges.新的老年人急诊入院回避系统对住院时间和当日出院的影响。
Age Ageing. 2014 Jan;43(1):116-21. doi: 10.1093/ageing/aft086. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
9
Predicting hospital admissions at emergency department triage using routine administrative data.利用常规行政数据预测急诊科分诊的住院人数。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Aug;18(8):844-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01125.x.
10
Emergency surgical treatment for nonvariceal bleeding of the upper part of the gastrointestinal tract.上消化道非静脉曲张性出血的急诊外科治疗
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1991 Feb;172(2):113-20.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment tools addressing avoidable care transitions in older adults: a systematic literature review.评估老年人可避免的护理过渡的工具:一项系统的文献综述
Eur Geriatr Med. 2024 Dec;15(6):1587-1601. doi: 10.1007/s41999-024-01106-7. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
2
Predicting the need for urgent endoscopic intervention in lower gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective review.预测下消化道出血患者紧急内镜干预的必要性:一项回顾性研究
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Apr 23;24(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-00990-3.
3
Surgical Management of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.
胃肠道间质瘤的外科治疗
J Adv Pract Oncol. 2023 Sep;14(6):541-547. doi: 10.6004/jadpro.2023.14.6.7. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
4
Early warning system enables accurate mortality risk prediction for acute gastrointestinal bleeding admitted to intensive care unit.早期预警系统可准确预测重症监护病房急性胃肠道出血患者的死亡风险。
Intern Emerg Med. 2024 Mar;19(2):511-521. doi: 10.1007/s11739-023-03428-z. Epub 2023 Sep 23.
5
Interventions to Prevent Potentially Avoidable Hospitalizations: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review.干预措施以预防潜在可避免的住院治疗:混合方法系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 11;10:898359. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.898359. eCollection 2022.
6
Management of Diverticular Bleeding: Evaluation, Stabilization, Intervention, and Recurrence of Bleeding and Indications for Resection after Control of Bleeding.憩室出血的管理:评估、稳定病情、干预措施、出血复发以及出血控制后手术切除的指征
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2018 Jul;31(4):243-250. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1607963. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
7
More Is Not Always Better: A Randomized Trial Of Low Volume Oral Laxative, Enemas, And Combination Of Both Demonstrate That Enemas Alone Are Most Efficacious For Preparation For Flexible Sigmoidoscopy.多并不总是更好:一项关于小剂量口服泻药、灌肠剂以及两者联合使用的随机试验表明,单独使用灌肠剂在乙状结肠镜检查准备中最为有效。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2016 Mar 17;7(3):e156. doi: 10.1038/ctg.2016.15.
8
Lower GI bleeding: a review of current management, controversies and advances.下消化道出血:当前管理、争议与进展综述
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Feb;31(2):175-88. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2400-x. Epub 2015 Oct 10.