Department of Nutritional Sciences, Graduate Programs in Clinical Nutrition, School of Health Professions, Rutgers University, Stratford & Newark, New Jersey..
Department of Interdisciplinary Studies, School of Health Related Professions, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey.
J Ren Nutr. 2014 Jan;24(1):32-41. doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2013.10.005.
The study objectives were to explore the predictors of measured resting energy expenditure (mREE) among a sample of maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients, to generate a predictive energy equation (MHDE), and to compare such models to another commonly used predictive energy equation in nutritional care, the Mifflin-St. Jeor equation (MSJE).
The study was a retrospective, cross-sectional cohort design conducted at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Study subjects were adult MHD patients (N = 67). Data collected from several clinical trials were analyzed using Pearson's correlation and multivariate linear regression procedures. Demographic, anthropometric, clinical, and laboratory data were examined as potential predictors of mREE. Limits of agreement between the MHDE and the MSJE were evaluated using Bland-Altman plots. The a priori α was set at P < .05. The main outcome measure was mREE.
The mean age of the sample was 47 ± 13 years. Fifty participants (75.6%) were African American, 7.5% were Hispanic, and 73.1% were males. Fat-free mass (FFM), serum albumin (ALB), age, weight, serum creatinine (CR), height, body mass index, sex, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP), and fat mass (FM) were all significantly (P < .05) correlated with mREE. After screening for multi-collinearity, the best predictive model (MHDE-lean body mass [LBM]) of mREE included (R(2) = 0.489) FFM, ALB, age, and CRP. Two additional models (MHDE-CRP and MHDE-CR) with acceptable predictability (R(2) = 0.460 and R(2) = 0.451) were derived to improve the clinical utility of the developed energy equation (MHDE-LBM). Using Bland-Altman plots, the MHDE over- and underpredicted mREE less often than the MSJE.
Predictive models (MHDE) including selective demographic, clinical, and anthropometric data explained less than 50% variance of mREE but had better precision in determining energy requirements for MHD patients when compared with MSJE. Further research is necessary to improve predictive models of mREE in the MHD population and to test its validity and clinical application.
本研究旨在探讨维持性血液透析(MHD)患者静息能量消耗(mREE)的预测因子,生成预测能量方程(MHDE),并将其与营养护理中常用的另一种预测能量方程——米夫林-圣杰罗方程(MSJE)进行比较。
本研究为回顾性、横断面队列设计,在范德比尔特大学医学中心进行。研究对象为成年 MHD 患者(N=67)。使用 Pearson 相关和多元线性回归程序分析从几项临床试验中收集的数据。将人口统计学、人体测量学、临床和实验室数据作为 mREE 的潜在预测因子进行检查。使用 Bland-Altman 图评估 MHDE 与 MSJE 之间的界限协议。先验α值设定为 P<.05。主要结局指标为 mREE。
样本的平均年龄为 47±13 岁。50 名参与者(75.6%)为非裔美国人,7.5%为西班牙裔,73.1%为男性。去脂体重(FFM)、血清白蛋白(ALB)、年龄、体重、血清肌酐(CR)、身高、体重指数、性别、高敏 C 反应蛋白(CRP)和脂肪量(FM)均与 mREE 显著相关(P<.05)。在筛选多共线性后,mREE 的最佳预测模型(MHDE-瘦体重[LBM])包括(R²=0.489)FFM、ALB、年龄和 CRP。另外两个具有可接受预测能力的模型(MHDE-CRP 和 MHDE-CR)(R²=0.460 和 R²=0.451)被推导出来,以提高开发的能量方程(MHDE-LBM)的临床实用性。使用 Bland-Altman 图,MHDE 对 mREE 的高估和低估比 MSJE 更少。
包括选择性人口统计学、临床和人体测量学数据的预测模型(MHDE)仅能解释 mREE 变化的 50%以下,但与 MSJE 相比,在确定 MHD 患者的能量需求方面具有更好的精度。需要进一步研究以改善 MHD 人群中 mREE 的预测模型,并检验其有效性和临床应用。