Suppr超能文献

桡动脉压平式眼压计用于重症监护病房患者连续无创动脉压监测:与有创评估的桡动脉压比较

Radial artery applanation tonometry for continuous non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring in intensive care unit patients: comparison with invasively assessed radial arterial pressure.

作者信息

Meidert A S, Huber W, Müller J N, Schöfthaler M, Hapfelmeier A, Langwieser N, Wagner J Y, Eyer F, Schmid R M, Saugel B

机构信息

II. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2014 Mar;112(3):521-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet400. Epub 2013 Dec 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Radial artery applanation tonometry technology can be used for continuous non-invasive measurement of arterial pressure (AP). The purpose of this study was to evaluate this AP monitoring technology in intensive care unit (ICU) patients in comparison with invasive AP monitoring using a radial arterial catheter.

METHODS

In 24 ICU patients (German university hospital), AP values were simultaneously recorded on a beat-to-beat basis using radial artery applanation tonometry (T-Line system; Tensys Medical, San Diego, CA, USA) and a radial arterial catheter (contralateral arm). The primary endpoint of the study was to investigate the accuracy and precision of the non-invasively assessed AP measurements with the Bland-Altman method based on averaged 10 beat AP epochs (n=2993 10 beat epochs).

RESULTS

For mean AP (MAP), systolic AP (SAP), and diastolic AP (DAP), we observed a bias (±standard deviation of the bias; 95% limits of agreement; percentage error) of +2 mm Hg (±6; -11 to +15 mm Hg; 15%), -3 mm Hg (±15; -33 to +27 mm Hg; 23%), and +5 mm Hg (±7; -9 to +19 mm Hg; 22%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In ICU patients, MAP and DAP measurements obtained using radial artery applanation tonometry show clinically acceptable agreement with invasive AP determination with a radial arterial catheter. While the radial artery applanation tonometry technology also allows SAP measurements with high accuracy, its precision for SAP measurements needs to be further improved.

摘要

背景

桡动脉压平式眼压测量技术可用于连续无创测量动脉压(AP)。本研究的目的是在重症监护病房(ICU)患者中评估这种动脉压监测技术,并与使用桡动脉导管进行的有创动脉压监测相比较。

方法

在24例ICU患者(德国大学医院)中,使用桡动脉压平式眼压测量法(T-Line系统;美国加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥的Tensys Medical公司)和桡动脉导管(对侧手臂)同时逐搏记录动脉压值。该研究的主要终点是基于平均10次搏动的动脉压时段(n = 2993个10次搏动时段),采用Bland-Altman方法研究无创评估动脉压测量的准确性和精密度。

结果

对于平均动脉压(MAP)、收缩压(SAP)和舒张压(DAP),我们分别观察到偏差(偏差的±标准差;95%一致性界限;百分比误差)为+2 mmHg(±6;-11至+15 mmHg;15%)、-3 mmHg(±15;-33至+27 mmHg;23%)和+5 mmHg(±7;-9至+19 mmHg;)。

结论

在ICU患者中,使用桡动脉压平式眼压测量法获得的MAP和DAP测量值与使用桡动脉导管进行的有创动脉压测定在临床上具有可接受的一致性。虽然桡动脉压平式眼压测量技术也能高精度地测量SAP,但其测量SAP的精密度仍需进一步提高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验