Suppr超能文献

眼压平测压法在病态肥胖患者行减重手术中监测血压是否可靠?

Is applanation tonometry a reliable method for monitoring blood pressure in morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery?

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Centre of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2016 Jun;116(6):790-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew100. Epub 2016 Apr 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of non-invasive continuous BP measurement by applanation tonometry in morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery.

METHODS

Arterial blood pressure (AP) was recorded intraoperatively both by applanation tonometry (AT) (T-Line 200pro, Tensys Medical(®), USA) and an arterial line (AL) after radial cannulation in obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Discrepancies between the two methods were assessed as bias, limits of agreement and percentage error. Mean, systolic, and diastolic arterial pressures were assessed (MAP, SAP, DAP respectively). Trending ability was assessed by concordance based on four-quadrant plotting.

RESULTS

Mean (sd) BMI of the 28 patients was 49.4 (9.7 kg m(-2)). A total of 201 907 time points were available for analysis. Bias for MAPAT compared with MAPAL was +3.97 mm Hg (SAPAT +3.45 mm Hg; DAPAT +3.66 mm Hg) with limits of agreement for MAPAT of -14.47 and +22.41 mm Hg (SAPAT -22.0 and +28.9 mm Hg; DAPAT -15.7 and +23.1 mm Hg). Percentage error for MAPAT was 23.5% (23.4% for SAPAT; 30.5% for DAPAT). Trending ability for MAP, SAP, and DAP revealed a concordance of 0.74, 0.72, and 0.71, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous BP assessment by applanation tonometry is feasible in morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. However, despite a low mean difference, 95% limits of agreement and trending ability indicate that the technology needs to be improved further, before being recommended for routine use in this group of patients.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估在接受减重手术的病态肥胖患者中,利用压平眼压测量法进行无创连续血压测量的有效性。

方法

在接受减重手术的肥胖患者中,经桡动脉穿刺后,术中同时通过压平眼压测量(T-Line 200pro,Tensys Medical(®),美国)和动脉线(AL)记录动脉血压(AP)。评估两种方法之间的差异为偏差、一致性界限和百分比误差。评估平均动脉压(MAP)、收缩压(SAP)和舒张压(DAP)。通过基于四象限绘图的一致性评估趋势能力。

结果

28 例患者的平均(标准差)BMI 为 49.4(9.7 kg/m²)。共有 201907 个时间点可用于分析。MAPAT 与 MAPAL 的平均偏差为+3.97 mmHg(SAPAT +3.45 mmHg;DAPAT +3.66 mmHg),MAPAT 的一致性界限为-14.47 和+22.41 mmHg(SAPAT -22.0 和+28.9 mmHg;DAPAT -15.7 和+23.1 mmHg)。MAPAT 的百分比误差为 23.5%(SAPAT 为 23.4%;DAPAT 为 30.5%)。MAP、SAP 和 DAP 的趋势能力显示一致性分别为 0.74、0.72 和 0.71。

结论

在接受减重手术的病态肥胖患者中,通过压平眼压测量法进行连续 BP 评估是可行的。然而,尽管平均差异较小,但 95%的一致性界限和趋势能力表明,在推荐该技术用于该组患者的常规使用之前,还需要进一步改进。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验