Centre for Clinical Governance Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, University of New South Wales, AGSM Building (L1), Randwick, NSW 2052, Australia.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Dec 21;13:530. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-530.
The health care quality improvement movement is a complex enterprise. Implementing clinical quality initiatives requires attitude and behaviour change on the part of clinicians, but this has proven to be difficult. In an attempt to solve this kind of behavioural challenge, the theoretical domains framework (TDF) has been developed. The TDF consists of 14 domains from psychological and organisational theory said to influence behaviour change. No systematic research has been conducted into the ways in which clinical quality initiatives map on to the domains of the framework. We therefore conducted a qualitative mapping experiment to determine to what extent, and in what ways, the TDF is relevant to the implementation of clinical quality interventions.
We conducted a thematic synthesis of the qualitative literature exploring clinicians' perceptions of various clinical quality interventions. We analysed and synthesised 50 studies in total, in five domains of clinical quality interventions: clinical quality interventions in general, structural interventions, audit-type interventions, interventions aimed at making practice more evidence-based, and risk management interventions. Data were analysed thematically, followed by synthesis of these themes into categories and concepts, which were then mapped to the domains of the TDF.
Our results suggest that the TDF is highly relevant to the implementation of clinical quality interventions. It can be used to map most, if not all, of the attitudinal and behavioural barriers and facilitators of uptake of clinical quality interventions. Each of these 14 domains appeared to be relevant to many different types of clinical quality interventions. One possible additional domain might relate to perceived trustworthiness of those instituting clinical quality interventions.
The TDF can be usefully applied to a wide range of clinical quality interventions. Because all 14 of the domains emerged as relevant, and we did not identify any obvious differences between different kinds of clinical quality interventions, our findings support an initially broad approach to identifying barriers and facilitators, followed by a "drilling down" to what is most contextually salient. In future, it may be possible to establish a model of clinical quality policy implementation using the TDF.
医疗保健质量改进运动是一项复杂的事业。实施临床质量举措需要临床医生改变态度和行为,但事实证明这很困难。为了尝试解决这种行为挑战,理论领域框架(TDF)已经开发出来。TDF 由 14 个来自心理和组织理论的领域组成,据说这些领域会影响行为改变。目前还没有对临床质量举措与框架领域之间映射关系的系统研究。因此,我们进行了一项定性映射实验,以确定 TDF 在何种程度以及以何种方式与临床质量干预措施的实施相关。
我们对探索临床医生对各种临床质量干预措施的看法的定性文献进行了主题综合分析。我们总共分析和综合了 50 项研究,这些研究涉及五个临床质量干预领域:一般临床质量干预、结构干预、审核型干预、旨在使实践更具循证依据的干预以及风险管理干预。数据通过主题进行分析,然后将这些主题综合成类别和概念,然后将这些类别和概念映射到 TDF 的领域。
我们的研究结果表明,TDF 与临床质量干预措施的实施高度相关。它可用于映射大多数(如果不是全部)临床质量干预措施的接受态度和行为障碍和促进因素。这 14 个领域中的每一个似乎都与许多不同类型的临床质量干预措施相关。可能还有一个额外的领域与实施临床质量干预措施的人可感知的可信度有关。
TDF 可广泛应用于各种临床质量干预措施。由于所有 14 个领域都被认为是相关的,并且我们没有发现不同类型的临床质量干预措施之间存在明显差异,因此我们的研究结果支持最初广泛识别障碍和促进因素的方法,然后“深入”了解最具上下文意义的因素。在未来,可能有可能使用 TDF 建立临床质量政策实施模型。