Crevier-Denoix Nathalie, Pourcelot Philippe, Holden-Douilly Laurène, Camus Mathieu, Falala Sylvain, Ravary-Plumioën Bérangère, Vergari Claudio, Desquilbet Loïc, Chateau Henry
Université Paris Est, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, USC 957 BPLC, F-94700 Maisons-Alfort, France; INRA, USC 957 BPLC, F-94700 Maisons-Alfort, France.
Université Paris Est, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, USC 957 BPLC, F-94700 Maisons-Alfort, France; INRA, USC 957 BPLC, F-94700 Maisons-Alfort, France.
Vet J. 2013 Dec;198 Suppl 1:e124-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.09.046. Epub 2013 Sep 27.
The type and condition of sport surfaces affect performance and can also be a risk factor for injury. Combining the use a 3-dimensional dynamometric horseshoe (DHS), an accelerometer and high-speed cameras, variables reflecting hoof-ground interaction and maximal limb loading can be measured. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of two racing surfaces, turf and all-weather waxed (AWW), on the forelimbs of five horses at the canter. Vertical hoof velocity before impact was higher on AWW. Maximal deceleration at impact (vertical impact shock) was not significantly different between the two surfaces, whereas the corresponding vertical force peak at impact measured by the DHS was higher on turf. Low frequency (0-200 Hz) vibration energy was also higher on turf; however high frequency (>400 Hz) vibration energy tended to be higher on AWW. The maximal longitudinal force during braking and the maximal vertical force at mid-stance were lower on AWW and their times of occurrence were delayed. AWW was also characterised by larger slip distances and sink distances, both during braking and at maximal sink. On a given surface, no systematic association was found between maximal vertical force at mid-stance and either sink distance or vertical impact shock. This study confirms the damping properties of AWW, which appear to be more efficient for low frequency events. Given the biomechanical changes induced by equestrian surfaces, combining dynamic and kinematic approaches is strongly recommended for a reliable assessment of hoof-ground interaction and maximal limb loading.
运动场地的类型和状况会影响运动表现,也可能是受伤的风险因素。结合使用三维测力马蹄铁(DHS)、加速度计和高速摄像机,可以测量反映蹄与地面相互作用以及肢体最大负荷的变量。本研究的目的是比较两种赛马场地,即草地和全天候打蜡场地(AWW),对五匹马慢跑时前肢的影响。在AWW上,蹄撞击前的垂直速度更高。两种场地在撞击时的最大减速(垂直撞击冲击)没有显著差异,而DHS测量的撞击时相应的垂直力峰值在草地上更高。草地上低频(0 - 200Hz)振动能量也更高;然而,高频(>400Hz)振动能量在AWW上往往更高。AWW上制动时的最大纵向力和站立中期的最大垂直力较低,且其出现时间延迟。AWW的特点还在于制动期间和最大下沉时的滑动距离和下沉距离都更大。在给定的场地,站立中期的最大垂直力与下沉距离或垂直撞击冲击之间未发现系统关联。本研究证实了AWW的减震特性,这似乎对低频事件更有效。鉴于马术场地引起的生物力学变化,强烈建议结合动态和运动学方法,以可靠评估蹄与地面的相互作用以及肢体最大负荷。