Dr. Goldfarb is professor, Department of Medicine, and associate dean for curriculum, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Dr. Morrison is professor, Department of Medicine, and senior vice dean for education, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Acad Med. 2014 Feb;89(2):264-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000103.
Curriculum evaluations are used to plan future revisions and other improvements in curriculum design. Most models are summative and occur at the end of a course, so improvements in instruction may be delayed. In this article, the authors describe the formative curriculum evaluation model adopted at the Raymond and Ruth Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania. In their model, representative student feedback is gathered in real time and used to modify courses and improve instruction. The central features of their continuous feedback model include developing a small cadre of preclinical and clinical student evaluators who are trained to obtain classwide input regarding all aspects of the curriculum, including teacher effectiveness, and meet regularly (weekly or monthly) with relevant faculty and administrators. The authors show how this curriculum evaluation approach maximizes student involvement in course development and provides opportunities for rapid improvements in course content and instruction as well as for the identification of barriers to effective clinical and preclinical educational experiences.
课程评估用于规划未来的课程修订和其他改进。大多数模型都是总结性的,发生在课程结束时,因此教学改进可能会延迟。本文作者描述了宾夕法尼亚大学雷蒙德和露丝·佩尔曼医学院采用的形成性课程评估模式。在他们的模式中,实时收集有代表性的学生反馈,并用于修改课程和改进教学。他们的持续反馈模型的核心特征包括培养一小批基础医学和临床学生评估员,他们接受培训以获得关于课程各个方面的全班输入,包括教师的有效性,并定期(每周或每月)与相关教师和管理人员会面。作者展示了这种课程评估方法如何最大限度地提高学生对课程开发的参与度,并为课程内容和教学的快速改进以及识别有效临床和基础医学教育体验的障碍提供机会。