Ardila A, Montañes P, Caro C, Delgado R, Buckingham H W
Instituto Neurologico de Colombia.
J Psycholinguist Res. 1989 Mar;18(2):163-80. doi: 10.1007/BF01067780.
Thirty-seven aphasic patients whose native language is Spanish were divided into four groups: (1) Broca's, (2) Wernicke's, (3) Conduction, and (4) Anomia. Phonological errors produced on repetition and object-naming tasks were analyzed in terms of type of transformation and degree of similarity between target and errors in terms of shared distinctive features. Segmental transformations were of the following types: (1) pure substitution, (2) pure addition, (3) deletion, (4) reduplicative addition (doublet creation)--anticipatory (right to left) or preservative (left to right), (5) reduplicative substitution (doublet creation)--anticipatory or perseverative, and (6) mutual exchanges. Pure substitutions were the most prevalent, exchanges, the least. Some error types were found to differentiate significantly between aphasic populations. We suggest that different mechanisms may underlie the same error type for different aphasic populations.
37名母语为西班牙语的失语症患者被分为四组:(1) 布罗卡失语症组,(2) 韦尼克失语症组,(3) 传导性失语症组,以及(4) 命名性失语症组。根据转换类型以及目标与错误之间在共享区别特征方面的相似程度,对重复和物体命名任务中产生的语音错误进行了分析。音段转换有以下几种类型:(1) 单纯替换,(2) 单纯添加,(3) 删除,(4) 重复添加(双音形式的产生)——预期性的(从右到左)或保留性的(从左到右),(5) 重复替换(双音形式的产生)——预期性的或持续性的,以及(6) 相互交换。单纯替换最为常见,交换则最少见。研究发现,某些错误类型在不同失语症群体之间存在显著差异。我们认为,不同的失语症群体中,相同的错误类型可能有不同的机制作为其基础。