Southern William N, Drainoni Mari-Lynn, Smith Bryce D, Koppelman Elisa, McKee M Diane, Christiansen Cindy L, Gifford Allen L, Weinbaum Cindy M, Litwin Alain H
Department of Medicine (Drs Southern and Litwin), Division of Hospital Medicine (Dr Southern), Division of General Internal Medicine (Dr Litwin), and Department of Family and Social Medicine (Dr McKee), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York; Department of Health Policy & Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts (Drs Drainoni, Christiansen, and Gifford and Ms Koppelman); Department of Medicine (Drs Drainoni and Gifford), Division of General Internal Medicine (Dr Gifford), Section of Infectious Diseases (Dr Drainoni), Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; Center for Health Quality, Outcomes and Economic Research, ENRM Veterans Administration Hospital, Bedford, Massachusetts (Drs Drainoni, Christiansen, and Gifford and Ms Koppelman); and Division of Viral Hepatitis, National Center for HIV/Viral Hepatitis/STD/TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (Drs Smith and Weinbaum).
Qual Manag Health Care. 2014 Jan-Mar;23(1):1-9. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000007.
Testing for patients at risk for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is recommended, but it is unclear whether providers adhere to testing guidelines. We aimed to measure adherence to an HCV screening protocol during a multifaceted continuous intervention.
Prospective cohort design to examine the associations between patient-level, physician-level, and visit-level characteristics and adherence to an HCV screening protocol. Study participants included all patients with a visit to 1 of the 3 study clinics and the physicians who cared for them. Adherence to the HCV screening protocol and patient-level, physician-level, and visit-level predictors of adherence were measured.
A total of 8981 patients and 154 physicians were examined. Overall protocol adherence rate was 36.1%. In multivariate analysis, patient male sex (odds ratio [OR] = 1.18), new patient (OR = 1.23), morning visit (OR = 1.32), and patients' preferred language being non-English (OR = 0.87) were significantly associated with screening adherence. There was a wide variation in overall adherence among physicians (range, 0%-92.4%). Screening adherence continuously declined from 59.1% in week 1 of the study to 13.7% in week 15 (final week). When implementing complex clinical practice guidelines, planners should address physician attitudinal barriers as well as gaps in knowledge to maximize adherence.
建议对丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染风险患者进行检测,但尚不清楚医疗服务提供者是否遵循检测指南。我们旨在衡量在多方面持续干预期间对HCV筛查方案的遵循情况。
采用前瞻性队列设计,以检查患者层面、医生层面和就诊层面特征与对HCV筛查方案的遵循情况之间的关联。研究参与者包括所有到3家研究诊所之一就诊的患者及其护理医生。测量了对HCV筛查方案的遵循情况以及遵循情况的患者层面、医生层面和就诊层面预测因素。
共检查了8981名患者和154名医生。总体方案遵循率为36.1%。在多变量分析中,患者为男性(比值比[OR]=1.18)、新患者(OR=1.23)、上午就诊(OR=1.32)以及患者首选语言为非英语(OR=0.87)与筛查遵循情况显著相关。医生之间的总体遵循情况存在很大差异(范围为0%-92.4%)。筛查遵循情况从研究第1周的59.1%持续下降至第15周(最后一周)的13.7%。在实施复杂的临床实践指南时,规划者应解决医生的态度障碍以及知识差距,以最大限度地提高遵循率。