Staeheli Martha, Aseltine Robert H, Schilling Elizabeth, Anderson Daren, Gould Bruce
Program for Recovery and Community Health, Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Division of Behavioral Sciences and Community Health and Center for Public Health and Health Policy, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA.
SAGE Open Med. 2017 Jun 8;5:2050312117712656. doi: 10.1177/2050312117712656. eCollection 2017.
Behavioral health disorders remain under recognized and under diagnosed among urban primary care patients. Screening patients for such problems is widely recommended, yet is challenging to do in a brief primary care encounter, particularly for this socially and medically complex patient population.
In 2013, intervention patients at an urban Connecticut primary clinic were screened for post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, and risky drinking (n = 146) using an electronic tablet-based screening tool. Screening data were compared to electronic health record data from control patients (n = 129) to assess differences in the prevalence of behavioral health problems, rates of follow-up care, and the rate of newly identified cases in the intervention group.
Results from logistic regressions indicated that both groups had similar rates of disorder at baseline. Patients in the intervention group were five times more likely to be identified with depression (p < 0.05). Post-traumatic stress disorder was virtually unrecognized among controls but was observed in 23% of the intervention group (p < 0.001). The vast majority of behavioral health problems identified in the intervention group were new cases. Follow-up rates were significantly higher in the intervention group relative to controls, but were low overall.
This tablet-based electronic screening tool identified significantly higher rates of behavioral health disorders than have been previously reported for this patient population. Electronic risk screening using patient-reported outcome measures offers an efficient approach to improving the identification of behavioral health problems and improving rates of follow-up care.
行为健康障碍在城市初级保健患者中仍未得到充分认识和诊断。广泛建议对患者进行此类问题的筛查,但在简短的初级保健就诊中进行筛查具有挑战性,尤其是对于这个社会和医学情况复杂的患者群体。
2013年,康涅狄格州一家城市初级诊所的干预患者使用基于电子平板电脑的筛查工具,接受了创伤后应激障碍、抑郁症和危险饮酒方面的筛查(n = 146)。将筛查数据与对照患者(n = 129)的电子健康记录数据进行比较,以评估行为健康问题的患病率、后续护理率以及干预组中新确诊病例率的差异。
逻辑回归结果表明,两组在基线时的疾病发生率相似。干预组患者被诊断为抑郁症的可能性高出五倍(p < 0.05))。对照组中几乎未发现创伤后应激障碍,但在干预组中有23%的患者被观察到患有该疾病(p < 0.001)。干预组中发现的绝大多数行为健康问题都是新病例。干预组的后续护理率相对于对照组显著更高,但总体上较低。
这种基于平板电脑的电子筛查工具所识别出的行为健康障碍发生率,显著高于此前针对该患者群体所报告的发生率。使用患者报告结局指标进行电子风险筛查,为改善行为健康问题的识别和提高后续护理率提供了一种有效方法。