School of Pharmacy, Concordia University Wisconsin, Mequon, Wisconsin.
School of Pharmacy and Health Professions, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, Maryland.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Dec 16;77(10):221. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7710221.
To assist administrators and faculty members in colleges and schools of pharmacy by gathering expert opinion to frame, direct, and support investments in student leadership development.
Twenty-six leadership instructors participated in a 3-round, online, modified Delphi process to define doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) student leadership instruction. Round 1 asked open-ended questions about leadership knowledge, skills, and attitudes to begin the generation of student leadership development guiding principles and competencies. Statements were identified as guiding principles when they were perceived as foundational to the instructional approach. Round 2 grouped responses for agreement rating and comment. Group consensus with a statement as a guiding principle was set prospectively at 80%. Round 3 allowed rating and comment on guidelines, modified from feedback in round 2, that did not meet consensus. The principles were verified by identifying common contemporary leadership development approaches in the literature.
Twelve guiding principles, related to concepts of leadership and educational philosophy, were defined and could be linked to contemporary leadership development thought. These guiding principles describe the motivation for teaching leadership, the fundamental precepts of student leadership development, and the core tenets for leadership instruction.
Expert opinion gathered using a Delphi process resulted in guiding principles that help to address many of the fundamental questions that arise when implementing or refining leadership curricula. The principles identified are supported by common contemporary leadership development thought.
通过收集专家意见,为药学专业院校的行政人员和教师提供框架、指导和支持学生领导力发展的投资。
26 名领导力教师参与了 3 轮在线修改 Delphi 流程,以确定药学博士(PharmD)学生领导力教学的定义。第 1 轮提出了关于领导力知识、技能和态度的开放性问题,以开始生成学生领导力发展指导原则和能力。当被认为是教学方法基础的陈述时,就被确定为指导原则。第 2 轮对回应进行了分组,以进行同意评级和评论。将 80%的一致性作为指导原则的共识设定为前瞻性的。第 3 轮允许对未达成共识的从第 2 轮反馈中修改的准则进行评分和评论。通过在文献中识别当代领导力发展的常见方法来验证这些原则。
确定了 12 项指导原则,涉及领导力和教育哲学的概念,可以与当代领导力发展思想联系起来。这些指导原则描述了教授领导力的动机、学生领导力发展的基本前提以及领导力教学的核心原则。
使用 Delphi 流程收集的专家意见产生了指导原则,有助于解决在实施或完善领导力课程时出现的许多基本问题。所确定的原则得到了当代领导力发展思想的支持。