Suppr超能文献

使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织住院患者满意度调查问卷(EORTC IN-PATSAT32)评估良性附件疾病单孔手术患者的满意度及手术结果:与传统腹腔镜手术的观察性比较

Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction Using the EORTC IN-PATSAT32 Questionnaire and Surgical Outcome in Single-Port Surgery for Benign Adnexal Disease: Observational Comparison with Traditional Laparoscopy.

作者信息

Buda Alessandro, Cuzzocrea Marco, Montanelli Luca, Passoni Paolo, Bargossi Lorena, Baldo Romina, Locatelli Luca, Milani Rodolfo

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milano-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy.

出版信息

Diagn Ther Endosc. 2013;2013:578392. doi: 10.1155/2013/578392. Epub 2013 Nov 25.

Abstract

Laparoscopic surgery has been demonstrated as a valid approach in almost all gynaecologic procedures including malignant diseases. Benefits of the minimally invasive approach over traditional open surgery have been well demonstrated in terms of minimal perioperative morbidity and reduced postoperative pain and hospital stay duration, with consequent quick postoperative recovery (Medeiros et al. (2009)). Single-port surgery resurfaced in gynaecology surgery in recent years and renewed interest among other surgeons and within the industry to develop this field (Podolsky et al. (2009)). Patient satisfaction is emerging as an increasingly important measure of quality which represents a complex entity that is dependent on patient demographics, comorbidities, disease, and, to a large extent, patient expectations (Tomlinson and Ko (2006)). It can be broadly thought to refer to all relevant experiences and processes associated with health care delivery (Jackson et al. (2001)). In this study we aim to compare single-port surgery (SPS) with conventional laparoscopy in terms of patient satisfaction using the EORTC IN-PATSAT32 questionnaire. We also evaluate the main surgical outcomes of both minimally invasive approaches.

摘要

腹腔镜手术已被证明是几乎所有妇科手术(包括恶性疾病手术)中的一种有效方法。与传统开放手术相比,微创方法在围手术期发病率极低、术后疼痛减轻和住院时间缩短方面的优势已得到充分证明,从而实现了术后快速恢复(梅代罗斯等人,2009年)。近年来,单孔手术在妇科手术中重新出现,并重新引起了其他外科医生和业内人士对该领域发展的兴趣(波多尔斯基等人,2009年)。患者满意度正日益成为衡量医疗质量的重要指标,它是一个复杂的概念,取决于患者的人口统计学特征、合并症、疾病情况,并且在很大程度上还取决于患者的期望(汤姆林森和科,2006年)。它大致可以被认为是指与医疗服务提供相关的所有相关经历和过程(杰克逊等人,2001年)。在本研究中,我们旨在使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)的IN-PATSAT32问卷,从患者满意度方面比较单孔手术(SPS)和传统腹腔镜手术。我们还评估了这两种微创方法的主要手术结果。

相似文献

4
Single-port laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomy.单孔腹腔镜及机器人辅助肾部分切除术
Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1163-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.12.029. Epub 2009 Jan 7.
6
Single port entry - are there any advantages?单孔入路——有优势吗?
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Jun;27(3):441-55. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.002. Epub 2013 Jan 20.
9
Robotic single-site plus ONE port distal pancreatectomy.机器人单部位加 ONE 端口远端胰腺切除术。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4258-4259. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5476-2. Epub 2017 Mar 24.

本文引用的文献

4
8
Consensus statement of the consortium for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery.腹腔镜单孔手术联盟共识声明
Surg Endosc. 2010 Apr;24(4):762-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0688-8. Epub 2009 Dec 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验