• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单孔内镜入路腹腔镜手术在良性附件手术中的效果:一项随机对照试验的研究方案

Effect of laparoscopy by single-port endoscopic access in benign adnexal surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Schmitt Andy, Crochet Patrice, Baumstark Karine, Tourette Claire, Poizac Sabine, Pivano Audrey, Boubli Léon, Cravello Ludovic, Agostini Aubert

机构信息

Pôle de gynécologie-obstétrique et reproduction, Gynepôle, AP-HM Hôpital de la Conception, 147 bd Baille, 13005, Marseille, France.

Clinical Research Platform, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.

出版信息

Trials. 2018 Jan 15;19(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2429-y.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-017-2429-y
PMID:29335017
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5769507/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic surgery has become the preferred surgical approach due to a reduction in postoperative pain, better recovery, shorter hospitalization, and improved esthetic outcomes. Laparoscopic surgery with single-port laparoscopy (SPL) is a laparoscopic surgery technique that is based on making a single parietal incision using a single trocar specifically designed to allow introduction of several instruments. The level of evidence regarding the advantages of SPL in terms of postoperative pain has remained low despite several randomized studies. Adult patients exhibiting a surgical indication for an a priori benign ovarian pathology or for prophylactic purposes that can be performed by laparoscopy will be randomized to receive conventional laparoscopy (CL) or SPL. The aim of our study is to evaluate whether SPL offers advantages over CL in benign adnexal surgery.

METHODS

The patients will be evaluated preoperatively to confirm their eligibility. The perioperative data up to 24 h after the intervention, as well as the postoperative data at day 7 and at one month from the intervention will be collected. The primary outcome for the study will be the postoperative pain at 24 h ± 2 h after the intervention. The pain will be assessed by a numeric rating scale of 0-10. Other outcomes will also be assessed, such as pain at other times, the consumption of analgesics, the operative time, perioperative bleeding, the number of additional trocars in the two groups, the incidence of laparoconversion, the esthetic criteria of the scar at one month, the incidence of complications, and the quality of life at one month.

DISCUSSION

If our hypothesis is confirmed, this study will provide evidence that the use of SPL can decrease postoperative pain in adnexal surgery. The standard surgical treatment of this condition would thus be modified.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02739724 . Registered on 12 April 2016.

摘要

背景

由于术后疼痛减轻、恢复更好、住院时间缩短以及美观效果改善,腹腔镜手术已成为首选的手术方式。单孔腹腔镜手术(SPL)是一种腹腔镜手术技术,其基于使用专门设计的单孔穿刺器进行单个腹壁切口,该穿刺器允许引入多种器械。尽管有多项随机研究,但关于SPL在术后疼痛方面优势的证据水平仍然较低。表现出可通过腹腔镜进行的先验性良性卵巢病变手术指征或预防性手术指征的成年患者将被随机分组,分别接受传统腹腔镜手术(CL)或SPL。我们研究的目的是评估在良性附件手术中SPL是否比CL更具优势。

方法

将对患者进行术前评估以确认其符合条件。收集干预后24小时内的围手术期数据以及干预后第7天和第1个月的术后数据。该研究的主要结局将是干预后24小时±2小时的术后疼痛。疼痛将通过0至10的数字评分量表进行评估。还将评估其他结局,例如其他时间的疼痛、镇痛药的使用、手术时间、围手术期出血、两组中额外穿刺器的数量、中转开腹的发生率、1个月时瘢痕的美观标准、并发症的发生率以及1个月时的生活质量。

讨论

如果我们的假设得到证实,本研究将提供证据表明使用SPL可减少附件手术中的术后疼痛。因此,这种疾病的标准手术治疗方法将得到改进。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT02739724。于2016年4月12日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c0a/5769507/5acca6c72b14/13063_2017_2429_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c0a/5769507/a20a75167952/13063_2017_2429_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c0a/5769507/5acca6c72b14/13063_2017_2429_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c0a/5769507/a20a75167952/13063_2017_2429_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c0a/5769507/5acca6c72b14/13063_2017_2429_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of laparoscopy by single-port endoscopic access in benign adnexal surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.单孔内镜入路腹腔镜手术在良性附件手术中的效果:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Jan 15;19(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2429-y.
2
Single-Port Laparoscopy vs Conventional Laparoscopy in Benign Adnexal Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.单孔腹腔镜手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗良性附件疾病的系统评价和Meta分析
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Nov-Dec;24(7):1083-1095. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
3
Is single-port access laparoscopy less painful than conventional laparoscopy for adnexal surgery? A comparison of postoperative pain and surgical outcomes.单孔腹腔镜附件手术是否比传统腹腔镜手术疼痛更轻?术后疼痛与手术结果的比较。
Surg Innov. 2013 Feb;20(1):46-54. doi: 10.1177/1553350612439632. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
4
Single port laparoscopy (SPL): Retrospective study evaluating postoperative pain in comparison with conventional laparoscopy (CL).单孔腹腔镜检查(SPL):一项回顾性研究,对比传统腹腔镜检查(CL)评估术后疼痛情况。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2018 Oct;47(8):365-369. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2018.04.006. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
5
Is single-port laparoscopy for benign adnexal disease less painful than conventional laparoscopy? A single-center randomized controlled trial.单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜治疗附件良性疾病的疼痛比较:一项单中心随机对照研究。
Fertil Steril. 2012 Oct;98(4):973-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.016. Epub 2012 Jul 4.
6
Transumbilical versus lateral transabdominal removal of benign adnexal masses in laparoscopic surgery-A randomized trial.腹腔镜手术中经脐与经腹外侧切除良性附件肿物的随机试验
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Nov;218:49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.08.040. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
7
Hybrid Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery Using a 2-mm Mini-Laparoscopic Instrument versus Conventional Three-Port Laparoscopy for Gynecologic Adnexal Diseases: A Prospective Randomized Trial.采用 2mm 迷你腹腔镜器械的杂交腹腔镜单孔手术与传统三孔腹腔镜用于妇科附件疾病:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2019;84(5):495-502. doi: 10.1159/000499912. Epub 2019 May 21.
8
Mini-Laparoscopy for Removal (Partial) of Adnexae at the Time of Hysterectomy.子宫切除时采用迷你腹腔镜(部分)切除附件
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Feb;24(2):201-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.11.005. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
9
[Single-port versus mini-laparoscopy in benign adnexal surgery: Results of a not randomized pilot study].[单孔腹腔镜与迷你腹腔镜在良性附件手术中的应用:一项非随机前瞻性研究结果]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2016 Nov;44(11):620-628. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2016.08.005. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
10
The Effects of a Laparoscopy by Single-Port Endoscopic Access in Benign Adnexal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.单孔腹腔镜在良性附件手术中的应用效果:一项随机对照试验。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2024 May;31(5):397-405. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2024.01.017. Epub 2024 Feb 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of perioperative outcomes of single-port laparoscopy, three-port laparoscopy and conventional laparotomy in removing giant ovarian cysts larger than 15 cm.比较单孔腹腔镜、三孔腹腔镜和传统开腹手术切除大于 15cm 的巨大卵巢囊肿的围手术期结局。
BMC Surg. 2021 Apr 21;21(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01205-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Single-Port Laparoscopy vs Conventional Laparoscopy in Benign Adnexal Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.单孔腹腔镜手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗良性附件疾病的系统评价和Meta分析
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Nov-Dec;24(7):1083-1095. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
2
Prospective comparison of single port versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for ectopic pregnancy.单孔腹腔镜手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗异位妊娠的前瞻性比较
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015 Apr;41(4):590-5. doi: 10.1111/jog.12595. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
3
Impact on ovarian reserve after laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy with reduced port number: a randomized controlled trial.
减少穿刺孔数量的腹腔镜卵巢囊肿剔除术对卵巢储备功能的影响:一项随机对照试验
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 May;176:34-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.02.025. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
4
Single-port access compared with three-port laparoscopic adnexal surgery in a randomized controlled trial.单孔腹腔镜附件手术与三孔腹腔镜附件手术的随机对照试验
J Int Med Res. 2013 Jun;41(3):673-80. doi: 10.1177/0300060513484437. Epub 2013 May 7.
5
Hysterectomy and bilateral adnexectomy by laparoscopic single port access for female to male transsexualism.经腹腔镜单孔入路行子宫切除术和双侧附件切除术治疗女性变男性易性症。
J Sex Med. 2013 May;10(5):1439. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12091. Epub 2013 Feb 22.
6
Minilaparoscopic versus single-port total hysterectomy: a randomized trial.迷你腹腔镜与单孔式全子宫切除术:一项随机试验。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Mar-Apr;20(2):192-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.11.007. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
7
[Feasibility of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology with conventional laparoscopic instruments].[使用传统腹腔镜器械进行妇科单孔腹腔镜手术的可行性]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2012 Dec;40(12):729-33. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2012.09.003. Epub 2012 Nov 17.
8
Single umbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of the prospective trial of the Coelio Club.单脐孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:腹腔镜俱乐部前瞻性试验的结果。
J Visc Surg. 2012 Dec;149(6):417-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2012.10.017. Epub 2012 Nov 13.
9
Is single-port laparoscopy for benign adnexal disease less painful than conventional laparoscopy? A single-center randomized controlled trial.单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜治疗附件良性疾病的疼痛比较:一项单中心随机对照研究。
Fertil Steril. 2012 Oct;98(4):973-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.016. Epub 2012 Jul 4.
10
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for adnexal preservation: a randomized controlled study.经脐单孔腹腔镜手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗附件保留的比较:一项随机对照研究。
Int J Womens Health. 2012;4:85-91. doi: 10.2147/ijwh.s29761. Epub 2012 Mar 13.