Geva Ronny, Schreiber Jessica, Segal-Caspi Lihi, Markus-Shiffman Michal
Department of Psychology, The Gonda Multidisciplinary Brain Research Center, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014 Jul;55(7):802-10. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12188. Epub 2013 Dec 28.
Behavioral inhibition (BI), the tendency to withdraw or exhibit negative affect when experiencing stressful situations, is a major risk factor for the development of social anxiety. However, neonatal biologic origins of this progression are still unknown. Click here to enter text.This study aimed to extend frameworks of behavioral inhibition by exploring empirically the central role of neonatal brainstem electrophysiologic functions in the development of social disengagement and BI.
Sixty-six preterm neonates (means ±SD: gestation age = 33.1 ± 1.22 weeks, birth weight = 1775 + 346.7 g; 51% female) participated in a prospective longitudinal study. The infants were tested within the first 2 weeks of postnatal life using an auditory brainstem-evoked response test. Based on the typicality of the major ABR wave latencies, waves I, III and V, neonates were divided into two groups (compromised, CBSF- with at least one component ≥1.5 SDs from the mean for the respective gestation age; normal, NBSF, with all components within 1.5 SD around the mean), and were enrolled in a prospective longitudinal follow-up study. This report extends previous work from 4 m by testing responses to socioemotional challenges during the Separation-Reunion paradigm at 12 m.
Results show that infants with neonatal CBSF were more susceptible to be classified as BI at 12 m (age corrected for prematurity) than infants with NBSF (66% vs. 40%, respectively). The most striking symptom in the CBSF group was a disability to initiate self-regulatory activities in response to a socioemotional challenge, resulting in frequent passivity/dependency (p < .001). Statistical regression analysis revealed that face-to-face gaze engagement at 4 m moderates the risk related to neonatal CBSF for the emergence of BI at 12 m, but did not overturn the emergence of BI.
Results support the hypothesis that neonatal brainstem dysfunction canalizes behavioral inhibition. These findings highlight, for the first time, the role of the early developing brainstem in later development of BI and in abilities to initiate self-regulatory behavior.
行为抑制(BI)是指个体在经历压力情境时表现出退缩或消极情绪的倾向,是社交焦虑发展的主要风险因素。然而,这种发展过程的新生儿生物学起源仍不清楚。本研究旨在通过实证探索新生儿脑干电生理功能在社交脱离和行为抑制发展中的核心作用,扩展行为抑制的理论框架。
66名早产儿(平均±标准差:胎龄=33.1±1.22周,出生体重=1775+346.7克;51%为女性)参与了一项前瞻性纵向研究。婴儿在出生后2周内使用听觉脑干诱发电位测试进行检测。根据主要听觉脑干反应(ABR)波潜伏期(波I、III和V)的典型性,将新生儿分为两组(受损组,CBSF,至少有一个成分比相应胎龄的平均值≥1.5个标准差;正常组,NBSF,所有成分在平均值±1.5个标准差范围内),并纳入前瞻性纵向随访研究。本报告通过测试12个月时在分离-团聚范式中对社会情感挑战的反应,扩展了之前4个月时的研究工作。
结果显示,与NBSF组婴儿相比,CBSF组新生儿在12个月(校正早产年龄)时更易被归类为行为抑制(分别为66%和40%)。CBSF组最显著的症状是在面对社会情感挑战时无法启动自我调节活动,并导致频繁的被动/依赖(p<0.001)。统计回归分析显示,4个月时的面对面注视参与可调节与新生儿CBSF相关的12个月时出现行为抑制的风险,但并未推翻行为抑制的出现。
结果支持新生儿脑干功能障碍导致行为抑制的假说。这些发现首次凸显了早期发育的脑干在行为抑制后期发展以及启动自我调节行为能力方面的作用。