• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

科研不端行为:21世纪一项重大的全球挑战。

Research misconduct: a grand global challenge for the 21st Century.

作者信息

Farthing Michael J G

机构信息

University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.

出版信息

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Mar;29(3):422-7. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12500.

DOI:10.1111/jgh.12500
PMID:24372677
Abstract

Research misconduct is now acknowledged to be an important global issue for both researchers and the wider community. Guidance on the responsible conduct of research is now widespread, but many are still concerned by the apparent rising tide of serious cases of research misconduct, and perhaps the more worrying widespread presence of questionable research practices. I would suggest that guidance and training, while essential, are not sufficient. Additional interventions, including enhanced monitoring of research outputs and random audit using the available technology should be considered, as should the desirability of having a register of "licensed researchers." In addition, I would support a culture change in the research community in which researchers are encouraged to admit their mistakes; this should be accompanied by a spirit of forgiveness and programmed rehabilitation for the individual concerned. For multiple "premier league" offenders who are reluctant to face their misdemeanors, it is difficult to see how they could continue in the role of a researcher, and their "registration" should be revoked. Research is increasingly undertaken by researchers who cross national boundaries. The globalization of research demands greater collaboration between organizations that are responsible for ensuring standards of research integrity; the need for international standards and guidance has never been greater.

摘要

研究不端行为如今被公认为是一个对研究人员和更广泛的社会群体而言都很重要的全球性问题。关于负责任的研究行为的指导意见如今已广泛存在,但许多人仍对严重研究不端行为明显呈上升趋势感到担忧,或许更令人担忧的是可疑研究行为的普遍存在。我认为,指导和培训虽然必不可少,但并不足够。应考虑采取额外的干预措施,包括加强对研究成果的监测以及利用现有技术进行随机审计,还应考虑设立“有资质研究人员登记册”的可取性。此外,我支持研究界的文化变革,鼓励研究人员承认自己的错误;这应伴随着宽容的精神以及为相关个人制定的恢复计划。对于那些不愿正视自己不当行为的多次违规的“顶级联赛”违规者,很难想象他们如何能继续担任研究人员的角色,他们的“登记”资格应被撤销。越来越多的研究是由跨越国界的研究人员进行的。研究的全球化要求负责确保研究诚信标准的组织之间加强合作;对国际标准和指导意见的需求从未如此迫切。

相似文献

1
Research misconduct: a grand global challenge for the 21st Century.科研不端行为:21世纪一项重大的全球挑战。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Mar;29(3):422-7. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12500.
2
The role of culture in research misconduct.文化在研究不当行为中的作用。
Account Res. 2003 Jul-Sep;10(3):189-201. doi: 10.1080/714906092.
3
The changing face of scientific misconduct.科学不端行为不断变化的面貌。
Clin Invest Med. 2004 Jun;27(3):117-9.
4
Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).研究机构与期刊在研究诚信案件方面的合作:出版伦理委员会(COPE)的指导。
Maturitas. 2012 Jun;72(2):165-9. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.03.011. Epub 2012 Apr 26.
5
Heterogeneity in European research integrity guidance: relying on values or norms?欧洲研究诚信指南中的异质性:依靠价值观还是规范?
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2014 Jul;9(3):79-90. doi: 10.1177/1556264614540594.
6
Evaluating U.S. medical schools' efforts to educate faculty researchers on research integrity and research misconduct policies and procedures.评估美国医学院校在教育教师研究员了解研究诚信和研究不端行为政策和程序方面的努力。
Account Res. 2014;21(1):9-25. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2013.822264.
7
Perspective: research misconduct: the search for a remedy.观点:研究不端行为:寻找补救措施。
Acad Med. 2012 Jul;87(7):877-82. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318257ee6a.
8
European Universities' Guidance on Research Integrity and Misconduct.欧洲大学关于研究诚信与不当行为的指南。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2017 Feb;12(1):33-44. doi: 10.1177/1556264616688980.
9
[Misconduct in clinical scientific investigations].[临床科学研究中的不当行为]
Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg. 2004;66(5-6):335-41.
10
Innovation and integrity in biomedical research.生物医学研究中的创新与诚信。
Acad Med. 1993 Sep;68(9 Suppl):S91-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge and practices of plagiarism among journal editors of Nepal.尼泊尔期刊编辑中关于抄袭的认知与行为
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2024 Aug 23;9(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s41073-024-00149-5.
2
Promoting Ethics and Integrity in Management Academic Research: Retraction Initiative.促进管理学术研究中的伦理与诚信:撤稿倡议。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Apr;25(2):357-382. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9941-z. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
3
Responsible conduct of research: enhancing local opportunities.负责任的研究行为:增加本地机会。
Afr Health Sci. 2017 Jun;17(2):584-590. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v17i2.36.