• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进管理学术研究中的伦理与诚信:撤稿倡议。

Promoting Ethics and Integrity in Management Academic Research: Retraction Initiative.

机构信息

Faculty of Industrial Management, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Lebuhraya Tun Razak, 26300, Gambang, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia.

Faculty of Industrial Management, Governance and Integrity Center (FGIC), Lebuhraya Tun Razak, 26300, Gambang, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia.

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Apr;25(2):357-382. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9941-z. Epub 2018 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1007/s11948-017-9941-z
PMID:29441445
Abstract

In the management academic research, academic advancement, job security, and the securing of research funds at one's university are judged mainly by one's output of publications in high impact journals. With bogus resumes filled with published journal articles, universities and other allied institutions are keen to recruit or sustain the appointment of such academics. This often places undue pressure on aspiring academics and on those already recruited to engage in research misconduct which often leads to research integrity. This structured review focuses on the ethics and integrity of management research through an analysis of retracted articles published from 2005 to 2016. The study employs a structured literature review methodology whereby retracted articles published between 2005 and 2016 in the field of management science were found using Crossref and Google Scholar. The searched articles were then streamlined by selecting articles based on their relevance and content in accordance with the inclusion criteria. Based on the analysed retracted articles, the study shows evidence of ethical misconduct among researchers of management science. Such misconduct includes data falsification, the duplication of submitted articles, plagiarism, data irregularity and incomplete citation practices. Interestingly, the analysed results indicate that the field of knowledge management includes the highest number of retracted articles, with plagiarism constituting the most significant ethical issue. Furthermore, the findings of this study show that ethical misconduct is not restricted to a particular geographic location; it occurs in numerous countries. In turn, avenues of further study on research misconduct in management research are proposed.

摘要

在管理学术研究中,学术进步、工作保障和在大学获得研究资金主要取决于在高影响力期刊上发表论文的数量。由于履历造假充斥着发表的期刊文章,大学和其他相关机构热衷于招聘或维持这些学术人员的职位。这往往给有抱负的学者和已经被录用的学者带来了从事研究不端行为的压力,而这种行为往往会导致研究诚信问题。本研究通过对 2005 年至 2016 年发表的被撤回文章进行分析,重点关注管理研究的伦理和诚信问题。该研究采用结构化文献综述方法,利用 Crossref 和 Google Scholar 检索了 2005 年至 2016 年期间发表在管理科学领域的被撤回文章。然后,根据相关性和内容选择文章,按照纳入标准对检索到的文章进行筛选。基于分析的被撤回文章,本研究表明管理科学研究人员存在伦理不当行为的证据。这种不当行为包括数据伪造、提交文章的重复、剽窃、数据异常和不完整的引用实践。有趣的是,分析结果表明,知识管理领域包含最多数量的被撤回文章,而剽窃是最严重的伦理问题。此外,本研究的发现表明,伦理不当行为不仅限于特定的地理位置,而是发生在许多国家。因此,提出了进一步研究管理研究中研究不端行为的途径。

相似文献

1
Promoting Ethics and Integrity in Management Academic Research: Retraction Initiative.促进管理学术研究中的伦理与诚信:撤稿倡议。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Apr;25(2):357-382. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9941-z. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
2
Research misconduct in health and life sciences research: A systematic review of retracted literature from Brazilian institutions.健康与生命科学研究中的科研不端行为:巴西机构撤回文献的系统综述。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 15;14(4):e0214272. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214272. eCollection 2019.
3
Reasons for and time to retraction of genetics articles published between 1970 and 2018.1970 年至 2018 年间发表的遗传学文章被撤稿的原因和时间。
J Med Genet. 2019 Nov;56(11):734-740. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106137. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
4
For how long and with what relevance do genetics articles retracted due to research misconduct remain active in the scientific literature.由于研究不端行为而撤回的遗传学文章在科学文献中活跃了多长时间,具有什么相关性。
Account Res. 2021 Jul;28(5):280-296. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2020.1835479. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
5
A proposed research misconduct policy for universities and postgraduate colleges in developing countries.一项针对发展中国家大学和研究生院校的拟议研究不当行为政策。
Niger Postgrad Med J. 2020 Jul-Sep;27(3):250-258. doi: 10.4103/npmj.npmj_51_20.
6
Data falsification and question on academic integrity.数据造假与学术诚信问题。
Account Res. 2019 Feb;26(2):108-122. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2018.1564664. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
7
How do Chinese universities address research integrity and misconduct? A review of university documents.中国高校如何应对研究诚信和不当行为?对高校文件的审查。
Dev World Bioeth. 2019 Jun;19(2):64-75. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12231. Epub 2019 May 15.
8
An analysis of retractions of dental publications.对牙科出版物撤回的分析。
J Dent. 2018 Dec;79:19-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
9
Comprehensive analysis of retracted journal articles in the field of veterinary medicine and animal health.兽医和动物健康领域撤回文章的综合分析。
BMC Vet Res. 2022 Feb 18;18(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12917-022-03167-x.
10
Retracted articles in the obstetrics literature: lessons from the past to change the future.撤回的妇产科文献:从过去吸取教训,改变未来。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2020 Nov;2(4):100201. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100201. Epub 2020 Aug 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Status of scientific research integrity knowledge in dental undergraduates from 34 universities in China.中国34所大学牙科本科生的科研诚信知识状况。
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Feb 22;26(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01183-8.
2
Plagiarism detection and prevention: a primer for researchers.抄袭检测与预防:研究人员入门指南
Reumatologia. 2021;59(3):132-137. doi: 10.5114/reum.2021.105974. Epub 2021 May 13.

本文引用的文献

1
A Systematic Literature Review of US Engineering Ethics Interventions.美国工程伦理干预措施的系统文献综述
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Apr;24(2):551-583. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9910-6. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
2
Publish or Perish mantra in the medical field: A systematic review of the reasons, consequences and remedies.医学领域的“不发表就出局”理念:对原因、后果及补救措施的系统评价
Pak J Med Sci. 2016 Nov-Dec;32(6):1562-1567. doi: 10.12669/pjms.326.10490.
3
Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity.
不当行为政策、学术文化和职业阶段,而非性别或发表压力,影响科学诚信。
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 17;10(6):e0127556. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127556. eCollection 2015.
4
Scientists Admitting to Plagiarism: A Meta-analysis of Surveys.承认抄袭的科学家:调查的元分析
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Oct;21(5):1331-52. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9600-6. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
5
Research misconduct: a grand global challenge for the 21st Century.科研不端行为:21世纪一项重大的全球挑战。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Mar;29(3):422-7. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12500.
6
Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications.不当行为导致了大多数被撤回的科学出版物。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 16;109(42):17028-33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212247109. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
7
Fostering integrity in research: definitions, current knowledge, and future directions.培养研究中的诚信:定义、现有知识及未来方向。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2006 Jan;12(1):53-74. doi: 10.1007/pl00022268.
8
New common federal definition of research misconduct in the United States.美国新的联邦层面通用的科研不端行为定义。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2000 Jan;6(1):123-30. doi: 10.1007/s11948-000-0030-2.