Kawasaki Lisa, Mushahwar Vivian K, Ho Chester, Dukelow Sean P, Chan Leo L H, Chan K Ming
Centre for Neuroscience, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Alberta Innovates-Health Solutions Interdisciplinary Team in Smart Neural Prostheses, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Wound Repair Regen. 2014 Mar-Apr;22(2):161-73. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12134. Epub 2013 Dec 13.
The objective of this article is to provide a systematic review of the efficacy of electrical stimulation in healing pressure ulcer and to review its mechanism of action. The Cochrane Library, PubMed, CINAHL, Medline, EMBASE, and NHS EED were searched for relevant interventional studies including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. A best-evidence synthesis was performed to summarize the results of the included studies. A total of seven RCTs and two observational studies met the inclusion criteria. Moderate level of evidence of efficacy with low risk of bias was shown in all seven RCTs. Although some studies have used continuous direct current, most other investigators opted to use high-voltage pulsed current to minimize the risk of skin burn and to achieve greater current penetration. Overall, the incidence of adverse effects was very low. Two studies that assessed the economic impacts of electrical stimulation revealed substantial health care cost savings. The mechanisms through which electrical stimulation exerts a positive effect on pressure ulcer healing are reasonably well established. Clinical trials have revealed a moderate level of evidence to support its use as an ancillary treatment modality for healing pressure ulcer. Recommendations regarding the optimal electrical stimulation parameters and dosage of use are provided. Further studies to investigate potential barriers that may impede widespread use in different clinical settings are needed.
本文的目的是对电刺激在压疮愈合中的疗效进行系统评价,并综述其作用机制。我们检索了考克兰图书馆、PubMed、CINAHL、Medline、EMBASE和NHS EED等数据库,查找相关的干预性研究,包括随机对照试验(RCT)和观察性研究。我们进行了最佳证据综合分析,以总结纳入研究的结果。共有7项RCT和2项观察性研究符合纳入标准。所有7项RCT均显示出疗效证据等级为中等且偏倚风险较低。尽管一些研究使用了连续直流电,但大多数其他研究者选择使用高压脉冲电流,以将皮肤烧伤风险降至最低,并实现更大的电流穿透。总体而言,不良反应的发生率非常低。两项评估电刺激经济影响的研究表明,可大幅节省医疗保健成本。电刺激对压疮愈合产生积极作用的机制已得到合理的确立。临床试验已显示出中等程度的证据支持将其用作压疮愈合的辅助治疗方式。本文提供了关于最佳电刺激参数和使用剂量的建议。还需要进一步研究,以调查可能阻碍其在不同临床环境中广泛应用的潜在障碍。