经食管超声心动图检测卵圆孔未闭的诊断准确性:一项荟萃分析。

Diagnostic accuracy of transesophageal echocardiogram for the detection of patent foramen ovale: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Mojadidi Mohammad Khalid, Bogush Nikolay, Caceres Jose Diego, Msaouel Pavlos, Tobis Jonathan M

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center, Bronx, New York.

出版信息

Echocardiography. 2014 Jul;31(6):752-8. doi: 10.1111/echo.12462. Epub 2013 Dec 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a remnant of the fetal circulation present in 20% of the population. Right-to-left shunting (RLS) through a PFO has been linked to the pathophysiology of stroke, migraine with aura, and hypoxemia. While different imaging modalities including transcranial Doppler, intra-cardiac echo, and transthoracic echo (TTE) have often been used to detect RLS, transesophageal echo (TEE) bubble study remains the gold standard for diagnosing PFO. The aim of this study was to determine the relative accuracy of TEE in the detection of PFO.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A systematic review of Medline, using a standard approach for meta-analysis, was performed for all prospective studies assessing accuracy of TEE in the detection of PFO using confirmation by autopsy, cardiac surgery, and/or catheterization as the reference. Search results revealed 3105 studies; 4 met inclusion criteria. A total of 164 patients were included. TEE had a weighted sensitivity of 89.2% (95% CI: 81.1-94.7%) and specificity of 91.4% (95% CI: 82.3-96.8%) to detect PFO. The overall positive likelihood ratio (LR+) was 5.93 (95% CI: 1.30-27.09) and the overall negative likelihood ratio (LR-) was 0.22 (95% CI: 0.08-0.56).

CONCLUSION

While TEE bubble study is considered to be the gold standard modality for diagnosing PFO, some PFOs may still be missed or misdiagnosed. It is important to understand the limitations of TEE and perhaps use other highly sensitive screening tests, such as transcranial doppler (TCD), in conjunction with TEE before scheduling a patient for transcatheter PFO closure.

摘要

背景

卵圆孔未闭(PFO)是胎儿循环的残留物,在20%的人群中存在。通过PFO的右向左分流(RLS)与中风、有先兆偏头痛和低氧血症的病理生理学有关。虽然包括经颅多普勒、心内超声和经胸超声心动图(TTE)在内的不同成像方式常被用于检测RLS,但经食管超声心动图(TEE)气泡试验仍是诊断PFO的金标准。本研究的目的是确定TEE在检测PFO方面的相对准确性。

方法和结果

采用标准的荟萃分析方法,对Medline进行系统评价,纳入所有评估TEE检测PFO准确性的前瞻性研究,以尸检、心脏手术和/或导管检查作为参考标准。检索结果显示3105项研究;4项符合纳入标准。共纳入164例患者。TEE检测PFO的加权敏感性为89.2%(95%CI:81.1-94.7%),特异性为91.4%(95%CI:82.3-96.8%)。总体阳性似然比(LR+)为5.93(95%CI:1.30-27.09),总体阴性似然比(LR-)为0.22(95%CI:0.08-0.56)。

结论

虽然TEE气泡试验被认为是诊断PFO的金标准方式,但仍可能漏诊或误诊一些PFO。了解TEE的局限性很重要,在安排患者进行经导管PFO封堵术前,可能需要结合使用其他高灵敏度筛查试验,如经颅多普勒(TCD)和TEE。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索